Trump tweets he 'took a pass' at being named TIME's person of the year

[Ban Hammer 13,105]

22 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

I think that NBF should be named Person of the Year, "for frequent and continuous creative use of the English language."

i'm sure that trophy will fit in well with all of the "man of the year" trophies from various women.

[TBoneTX 44,658]

All from the November 1976 Playboy.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

2 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

i'm sure that trophy will fit in well with all of the "man of the year" trophies from various women.

dont be a hater just cause I am a jet flying, rolex wearing kiss stealing son of a gun 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

[Póg mo 1,749]

On 11/26/2017 at 9:36 AM, jayjayj said:

I'm shocked but not surprised how easy it is for President Trump to troll the left.  He is a Twitter savant.  One tweet that goes against the group think talking points and they all lose their collective mind.  The hilarious part is that they still haven't figured out that he knows exactly what he is doing with each tweet. 

Yes very presidential. Remember when Republicans used to attack Bill Clinton for undermining the office of the Presidency. 

[JimandChristy 1,689]

11 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

Yes very presidential. Remember when Republicans used to attack Bill Clinton for undermining the office of the Presidency. 

He is very much a troll or he's actually mentally ill. Look at videos of him talking back in the 1990s or even in the 2000s hes articulate, calm and composed. Now look at him, he's a loose cannon, impulsive and doesn't think before he acts.

[bcking 3,157]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

Well there is the whole "The police acted stupidly comment" which had the impact of immediately denigrating the actions of the police officer on duty and of course Obama did not have all the facts and had to back up and hold the Beer Summit.  As to Zimmerman, it may have been indirect, but it was still an attack without knowing the facts.  As to Ferguson, we all know how the president took sides and immediately dispatched his AG to go and venerate the perpetrator of a crime.  Obama's method tended to be more indirect, but it doesn't change the fact that it is the same thing in many of the viewing publics opinion's.

 

Style differences only matters to some and in my opinion is a horrible method to use for electing a president.  If Trump is actually able to accomplish something that improves the economy (using the GDP growth as the measure) greater than 3%, then I could not care less about his style because as many politicians will tell you, it is all about the economy.

Style is important for President because, at its core, the President is a representative. He is a symbol. He isn't a legislator. He is meant to bring people together, to be a leader of everyone. He isn't meant to be divisive. 

 

I admit I don't necessarily remember what Obama said for each of the 3 examples you gave. Rereading his comments surrounding Trayvon and Zimmerman I see absolutely zero comparison to the stuff Trump spews out. He expressed sadness, he said an investigation needs to be done, and commenting on relating to the victim's family. Nothing wrong with any of that.

 

Granted this article is old, but I'd challenge you or anyone to find this many examples in 8 years of any prior President, Republican or Democrat. 

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Trump+personal+insults+since+becoming+president&oq=Trump+personal+insults+since+becoming+president&aqs=chrome..69i57j35i39j0l4.3951j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

[Dunngary 37]

7 hours ago, JimandChristy said:

He is very much a troll or he's actually mentally ill. Look at videos of him talking back in the 1990s or even in the 2000s hes articulate, calm and composed. Now look at him, he's a loose cannon, impulsive and doesn't think before he acts.

 

He's sick. His behavior shows it.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

11 hours ago, Póg mo said:

Yes very presidential. Remember when Republicans used to attack Bill Clinton for undermining the office of the Presidency. 

Kinda sucks when someone uses your own techniques to fight back against you, eh?

[Dashinka 24,108]

17 hours ago, Póg mo said:

Yes very presidential. Remember when Republicans used to attack Bill Clinton for undermining the office of the Presidency. 

And yet he was allowed to continue to do it and now times have changed.  At least he isn't going out on apology tours.

[Dashinka 24,108]

16 hours ago, bcking said:

Style is important for President because, at its core, the President is a representative. He is a symbol. He isn't a legislator. He is meant to bring people together, to be a leader of everyone. He isn't meant to be divisive. 

 

I admit I don't necessarily remember what Obama said for each of the 3 examples you gave. Rereading his comments surrounding Trayvon and Zimmerman I see absolutely zero comparison to the stuff Trump spews out. He expressed sadness, he said an investigation needs to be done, and commenting on relating to the victim's family. Nothing wrong with any of that.

 

Granted this article is old, but I'd challenge you or anyone to find this many examples in 8 years of any prior President, Republican or Democrat. 

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Trump+personal+insults+since+becoming+president&oq=Trump+personal+insults+since+becoming+president&aqs=chrome..69i57j35i39j0l4.3951j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

I don't disagree, but I think there is too much emphasis put on Trump's political style.  If you compare it to the last president, sure Obama was apologetic for the perceived transgressions of the US and several times drew some mythical lines in the sand for various things that he never backed up.  This is how a US president loses respect on the world stage.  So far Trump has backed up his words, and as offensive as some find his style, there are a lot of people (particularly world leaders) that are fine with it.

[Dunngary 37]

You mistake disdain for respect. 

Edited November 28, 2017 by Dunngary

[Póg mo 1,749]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

And yet he was allowed to continue to do it and now times have changed. 

 

Not for the better, that is for sure.

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

 

At least he isn't going out on apology tours.

No, he is too busy excusing modern day Nazis. 

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

And yet he was allowed to continue to do it and now times have changed. 

 

Not for the better, that is for sure.

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

 

At least he isn't going out on apology tours.

No, he is too busy excusing modern day Nazis. 

[Póg mo 1,749]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

And yet he was allowed to continue to do it and now times have changed. 

 

Not for the better, that is for sure.

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

 

At least he isn't going out on apology tours.

No, he is too busy excusing modern day Nazis. 

[Dashinka 24,108]

12 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

Not for the better, that is for sure.

No, he is too busy excusing modern day Nazis. 

Not for the better, that is for sure.

No, he is too busy excusing modern day Nazis. 

Ah, now Trump is a Nazi.  Interesting deflection.