Does not meet Physical presence to pass Citizenship (split)

[babyevenia 0]

3 minutes ago, RO_AH said:

If you want help or advice please take the advice and help being offered. Otherwise I see no reason for your post. You have almost the same status as your friend so you are basing your thoughts on what someone else is saying? Did you stop to think maybe your friend does not completely understand, or maybe you are not understanding your friend correctly?

 

You have been asked many times by posters here if you even ever filed for CRBA. It's rather obvious now that you have not. So you, by your own thoughts, based on a friends perception of what is happening in her case have already decided that you can't get a CRBA. What you described for "your friend" has nothing to do with a CRBA.as no such proof is required. my thoughts to you is stop taking advice from your friend and instead get advice here where you have knowledgeable people who have actually gone through the process.

 

I stand by my last comment. You need a CR-1 and your baby needs a CRBA & US Passport. If the CO doubts your story when applying for CRBA they will have you get a DNA test. As long as the baby is yours and your asawa (the USC) you will pass that and be fine. 

 

I strongly suggest that you read the following document from the US Embassy in Manila regarding requirements for a CRBA.

https://ph.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/82/2017/01/CITIZENSHIP-CRBA-Checklist-2017-January.pdf

Hello. I am a filipina and my husband is a usc through naturalization. The physical presence based on the CO is insuffiecient since it must be 5 years or more that my husband stayed there. We couldn't find any more proofs because we lost his phil. Passport when he got there the first time. 

[babyevenia 0]

We had been interviewes by the consular officer of us embassy manila,they said the physical presence of my husband should meet the 5 year requirements for him to transmit his citizenship to our child. He got his citizenship thru adoption

Edited November 18, 2017 by Ontarkie
Removed quoted part and there was confusion with the posters.

[Ontarkie 14,190]

~~Post split off from another members thread. Do not post your question in other members thread I had to remove a members post because he thought he was replying to the OP of the other thread and got your post mixed into it.~~