Jump to content
The Nature  Boy

Woman says Roy Moore initiated sexual encounter when she was 14, he was 32

 Share

109 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
1 hour ago, elmcitymaven said:

Waiting for someone here to come to his defense. I am disappointed it has not yet happened, since I really only read here nowadays for such hot takes. :( 

 

1 hour ago, CaliCat said:

 

I'm sure they're mounting a good VJ style defense with lots of red herrings, strawman arguments, deflection, and the party favorite "post hoc ergo propter hoc" that we've all grown so fond of!

this is big, it will take 48 hours to spin this into a Culture war counter.   "The politically correct social justice warriors are declaring war on Christmas by their disgusting perversion of the adoration of Mary who was also a teenager"  

1 hour ago, Jacque67 said:

I've no idea why Huey Lewis was playing in the background, darlin'. You can't even go to a park these days and talk to another family!

"little bitty pretty one"

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

The Establishment Republicans could have nailed him with this during the primary, but they probably presumed that their anointed candidate would win.  Unfortunately for the Establishment, the voters of Alabama picked the candidate whom the voters wanted, which is unacceptable to the Establishment.  Anyone whom the Establishment can't control must be crushed.

 

The Washington Post had already endorsed the Democrat, so waiting till now to break the allegations -- a month before the election, when it's too late for the Alabama ballot to be changed -- fits the Post's goals, too.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
10 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

 

this is big, it will take 48 hours to spin this into a Culture war counter.   "The politically correct social justice warriors are declaring war on Christmas by their disgusting perversion of the adoration of Mary who was also a teenager"  

"little bitty pretty one"

 

10 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

 

this is big, it will take 48 hours to spin this into a Culture war counter.   "The politically correct social justice warriors are declaring war on Christmas by their disgusting perversion of the adoration of Mary who was also a teenager"  

"little bitty pretty one"

Shudder!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
9 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

The Establishment Republicans could have nailed him with this during the primary, but they probably presumed that their anointed candidate would win.  Unfortunately for the Establishment, the voters of Alabama picked the candidate whom the voters wanted, which is unacceptable to the Establishment.  Anyone whom the Establishment can't control must be crushed.

 

The Washington Post had already endorsed the Democrat, so waiting till now to break the allegations -- a month before the election, when it's too late for the Alabama ballot to be changed -- fits the Post's goals, too.

 Sorry, why did the Establishment Republicans not bring this out?  I don't get that part. 

And   So what, Did he do these things or not?

Edited by Il Mango Dulce

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

My other thread was closed so I will repost 

 

http://time.com/5017940/roy-moore-sexual-contact-underage-jesus-defense-jim-ziegler/

 

While some Republicans at the national level spoke out against Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore on Thursday in the wake of allegations that he initiated sexual contact with a 14-year-old when he was in his 30s, Republicans from his own state seemed to have a different view — with one citing Jesus’ parents to defend Moore’s alleged behavior.

“Take Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus,” Alabama state auditor Jim Ziegler told the Washington Examiner on Thursday.

Four women have told the Washington Post that Moore pursued relationships with them when they were teenagers and he was an adult. The women were between the ages of 14 and 18, while Moore was in his 30s at the time, according to the Post

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
4 hours ago, Jacque67 said:

Quoting the Bible, Alabama state auditor and Moore supporter Jim Zeigler told The Washington Examiner that there is “nothing immoral or illegal here.”

“Maybe just a little bit unusual,” he admitted. 

Zeigler compared the allegations to Biblical relationships.

“Take Joseph and Mary,” Zeigler told the Examiner. “Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus." 

Duplication is why the other referenced thread was closed.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
7 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

 1.  Sorry, why did the Establishment Republicans not bring this out?  I don't get that part. 

2.  And   So what, Did he do these things or not?

1.  On the basis of polls, Luther Strange (the Establishment candidate in the primary) was the presumptive victor, so there was no need (yet).

2.  How does one defend one's self against such?  The timing is highly questionable (a charitable characterization).

     "If the allegations are made, they must be true" ... Tawana Brawley, Duke University lacrosse team...

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
7 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

1.  On the basis of polls, Luther Strange (the Establishment candidate in the primary) was the presumptive victor, so there was no need (yet).

 

7 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

 

Strange never had the nomination locked up

7 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

2.  How does one defend one's self against such?  The timing is highly questionable (a charitable characterization).

We are still waiting for a defense.. haven't seen one.

7 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

     "If the allegations are made, they must be true" ... Tawana Brawley, Duke University lacrosse team...

 

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, elmcitymaven said:

Waiting for someone here to come to his defense. I am disappointed it has not yet happened, since I really only read here nowadays for such hot takes. :( 

Sadly you are wishing for something that is not happening.  So sorry we are disappointing you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

That was a legitimate question:  How does anyone (not just Roy Moore) defend himself against such allegations?

How can innocence -- or the validity of the allegation -- be proved, especially so soon before an election?

Answer:  it can't.  It's like trying to respond to "So, Mr. ____, when did you stop beating your wife?"

Remember how Al Sharpton pushed the Tawana Brawley allegation?  How true did that turn out to be?

Remember the allegations against the Duke University lacrosse team?  How true did those turn out to be?

 

The Washington Post, having endorsed the Democrat, has a vested interest in bringing this candidate down.

The Establishment Republicans most certainly have a vested interest in bringing this candidate down.

McConnell and McCain and their ilk are saying, "Well, if the allegations are true, then Moore should withdraw."

What is this "if the allegations are true" nonsense?

A real response would be, "Let the election proceed, and the outcome of the other matter will be dealt with when it's clarified."

 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
5 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

That was a legitimate question:  How does anyone (not just Roy Moore) defend himself against such allegations?

How can innocence -- or the validity of the allegation -- be proved, especially so soon before an election?

Answer:  it can't.  It's like trying to respond to "So, Mr. ____, when did you stop beating your wife?"

Remember how Al Sharpton pushed the Tawana Brawley allegation?  How true did that turn out to be?

Remember the allegations against the Duke University lacrosse team?  How true did those turn out to be?

 

The Washington Post, having endorsed the Democrat, has a vested interest in bringing this candidate down.

The Establishment Republicans most certainly have a vested interest in bringing this candidate down.

McConnell and McCain and their ilk are saying, "Well, if the allegations are true, then Moore should withdraw."

What is this "if the allegations are true" nonsense?

A real response would be, "Let the election proceed, and the outcome of the other matter will be dealt with when it's clarified."

 

Trial by election? 

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
8 hours ago, Jacque67 said:

Alex Jones and a stooge are defending him Mavs! It's it's it's Hollywood, they're the ones all doing it!

 

Alex Jones and guest defend Roy Moore against child sex assault charges @RealAlexJones @infowars 
26 minutes ago
Vic Berger IV

Using confused emoticon cuz we don't have an "im so creeped out" one

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

1.  On the basis of polls, Luther Strange (the Establishment candidate in the primary) was the presumptive victor, so there was no need (yet).

2.  How does one defend one's self against such?  The timing is highly questionable (a charitable characterization).

     "If the allegations are made, they must be true" ... Tawana Brawley, Duke University lacrosse team...

Is the timing that questionable though? 

 

If you look at just the election process I agree with you, regardless of whether or not it is true or not, it seems clearly planned to come out now.

 

However, if you look at it from the lens of our society in general, I wonder if the timing has more to do with the other recent public releases about high powered men and their sexual assaults? Does the post say when they spoke to the 4 women? Did they come forward just recently in the last couple of weeks?

 

It is not that surprising to me, or anyone who has cared for victims of sexual assault, to think that perhaps these women kept it quiet because he was a man in power, and felt threatened by that. The recent deluge of reports about high profile men and their subsequent ostracization (sp?) for their actions may have lent the women support and courage to speak up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
8 hours ago, elmcitymaven said:

Waiting for someone here to come to his defense. I am disappointed it has not yet happened, since I really only read here nowadays for such hot takes. :( 

What’s to defend.  If he did it, then he should be punished.  The GOP needs to drop him immediately and do the same thing the Dems did in NJ a few years back, and Moore can then fight this in court if he didn’t do it.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...