Jump to content

76 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 10/18/2017 at 4:24 PM, IDWAF said:

It means that CA and NY has a very large population of voters.  If our presidency were to be determined by the popular vote, CA and NY alone would either carry the race, or come close to it.  That means that the people in the other 48 states wishes would be overruled by the (insert your own explicative here) folks in NY and CA.

 

 

Coffee:

https://www.coffeeforless.com/kopi-luwak-coffee-beans-1lb-bag.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw95vPBRDVARIsAKvPd3Lzvmz7_OZOxt44Ox9aKPzKmezA1wD0W9xXA7HmMz4hdd0B0oTLDeQaAqQ5EALw_wcB

Expand  

That is good coffee, but so crazy expensive.  As an alternative, try Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee.  It is just as good and not nearly as expensive as the cat poop coffee.  

Edited by jayjayj

 

 

Click Spoiler for signature timeline.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
  On 10/18/2017 at 4:25 PM, smilesammich said:

not sure what you're arguing but fact remains - she won the popular vote. i know that hurts trump's fee fees.

from the op? indeed.

Expand  

She won the popular vote because of one single state that is all. This is why we have the Electoral College and I am glad it's in place. 

Edited by cyberfx1024
Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 4:25 PM, smilesammich said:

not sure what you're arguing but fact remains - she won the popular vote. i know that hurts trump's fee fees.

from the op? indeed.

Expand  

Most likely, she didn't win the popular vote.  She won the popular vote when you include millions of illegal votes.  I'm sure we will find out sometime in the next 7 years.  The swamp takes a long time to drain.  

 

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-is-right-millions-of-illegals-probably-did-vote-in-2016/

 

It wasn't just California -

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/7/voter-fraud-alert-over-5000-new-hampshire-presiden/

 

 

 

 

Click Spoiler for signature timeline.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Folks, this thread has gone way off the topic, and the OP has requested returning to it.  Thanks.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 4:32 PM, TBoneTX said:

Folks, this thread has gone way off the topic, and the OP has requested returning to it.  Thanks.

Expand  

Roger

 

 

Click Spoiler for signature timeline.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 3:44 PM, Jacque67 said:

Yeah, my thread is about trump's subpoena . He has until October 31st.

Expand  

and points 11 & 12 seem pretty narrow/ specific.

Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 4:34 PM, IDWAF said:

I agree. Let’s get back to talking about those sexual allegations from years ago that never happened, otherwise they would have been pursued way before Trump ran for president.

 

 

What’s the statute of limitations of an allegation?

Expand  

The statute of limitations for a cause of action for defamation in New York is one year from the date of publication of the allegedly defamatory statement to a person other than the plaintiff. [N.Y. C.P.L.R. 215(3).] Trump made the allegedly defamatory statements about Zervos in October 2016, and she filed the lawsuit in January 2017. Therefore, Zervos' claims are not time-barred.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 7:09 PM, elmcitymaven said:

The statute of limitations for a cause of action for defamation in New York is one year from the date of publication of the allegedly defamatory statement to a person other than the plaintiff. [N.Y. C.P.L.R. 215(3).] Trump made the allegedly defamatory statements about Zervos in October 2016, and she filed the lawsuit in January 2017. Therefore, Zervos' claims are not time-barred.

Expand  

Buzzkill lol 😁

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 7:09 PM, elmcitymaven said:

The statute of limitations for a cause of action for defamation in New York is one year from the date of publication of the allegedly defamatory statement to a person other than the plaintiff. [N.Y. C.P.L.R. 215(3).] Trump made the allegedly defamatory statements about Zervos in October 2016, and she filed the lawsuit in January 2017. Therefore, Zervos' claims are not time-barred.

Expand  

maves is not a real person but an automated bot (not the Russian kind) that provides legal advice when a legal questions on CEHEST arise. Truely remarkable.

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 9:26 PM, Il Mango Dulce said:

maves is not a real person but an automated bot (not the Russian kind) that provides legal advice when a legal questions on CEHEST arise. Truely remarkable.

Expand  

So if I understand you right you are accusing her account of being a sock puppet ?

 

Joking :jest:

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 9:38 PM, Nature Boy Flair said:

So if I understand you right you are accusing her account of being a sock puppet ?

 

Joking :jest:

Expand  

Just that her skill is superhuman, I have no other explanation 

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
  On 10/18/2017 at 9:53 PM, Nature Boy Flair said:

Her only superhuman skill is sucking the wind out of us VJ jailhouse constitutional expert lawyers:jest:

Expand  

Too bad, they are a critical part of the Trump Defense team. 

ftiq8me9uwr01.jpg

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...