Obama speaks out on Harvey Weinstein allegations

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

36 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

 

In April 1997, Jill Harth Houraney filed a $125,000,000 lawsuit against Trump for sexual harassment in 1993, claiming he "'groped' her under her dress and told her he wanted to make her his 'sex slave'". Harth voluntarily withdrew the suit when her husband settled a parallel case.

OK, her husband filed a suit in a parallel case and he settled, so she dropped the charges, she herself did not settle neither was your claim of "shot down" correct.

"Know better"  and  "know more about"  is a far cry from "grabbing genitals of whoever he wants because he is famous and wealthy" according to his own words.
It is more than braggadacio, it is disgusting.

Then we have the rape allegations, once the case was dropped due to technicalities with an address and later she didn't show up because of threats to her life.
I am not saying he raped her, I am saying he had several women step forward to claim sexual misconduct. He is not squeaky clean AS HE HIMSELF IS HEARD CLEARLY
ON THE VIDEO CLIP and for which you are making excuses.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/



 

When I said “shot down”, I was referring to “Katie Johnson”, later “Jane Doe” for the alleged underage rape accusation.  Different case altogether (same lawyer though).  Case never went to trial twice.

 

If it were ever proven that Trump raped someone, I would cheer his incarceration as much as you.  But let’s be honest, people like Bill Clinton and Trump can get away with a LOT more than we the people.  It’s sad, but it’s true.  

 

I wasn’t making excuses for the audio clip.  He said it, no doubt about it.  But to me, it means little.  Wouldn’t be up in arms about it had it been Obama saying it. Or Rodney Dangerfield.  Or Rihanna.  Or you.  Talk is cheap.  My wife has said that she would “do him” in reference to certain hot celebs.  Doesn’t mean I need to get upset and divorce her.  I know she wouldn’t really do anything wrong, it’s just fun to talk schmack sometimes.  Unfortunately for Trump, someone paid a lot of money to dig up that nugget to smear his campaign.  Wouldn’t happen to either you or me.

 

When I said “know better”, I was using VJ words for remarks similar to what Trump made.  Maybe more less.  Maybe less.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

Talk is cheap and cheap talk is cheaper than cheap.
I would never say 'I would do him' to anyone nor does my spouse say that. 100% truth !
Nor would I say I always grab anyone's genitals because I am rich and famous and I get away with it. That's just sick.
We weigh our words before we speak, it's not fun to us to talk that way but whatever

floats your boat.
"Know better" and "grab her p" is not even translatable from one to the other, not even in VJ lingo. It is just a watered down statement that says I didn't kill him,
I just tickled him with a gun and he liked it. OR.....I can shoot and kill anyone on the street and they would still like me. It's insane. It's really insane for a so called prez.
He is so arrogant, vulgar and full of hot air that if you hang a basket under his chin he would sail to the highest skies.

In the link I posted it states the lawsuit was filed twice and states the  reason why it was not further pursued each time. (Katie Johnson).

 

In a nut shell the intent of my posts were to point out the hypocrisy and that they are all wrong for their behavior. If you find it acceptable language
then we certainly disagree as I liken his behavior to that of a sexual predator. You want a conviction I gather before you call it wrong but there is such
a thing as walking the edge constantly and getting away with it until one day you lose the game. Morals have been lost long ago by Trump, he doesn't care

because he is rich and famous and can do what he wants according to the words out of his mouth. His attitude will catch up with him and I believe we will
see him getting increasingly blinded by power and display further predatory behavior against women.

 

[eieio 1,594]

4 hours ago, Ebunoluwa said:

Talk is cheap and cheap talk is cheaper than cheap.
I would never say 'I would do him' to anyone nor does my spouse say that. 100% truth !
Nor would I say I always grab anyone's genitals because I am rich and famous and I get away with it. That's just sick.
We weigh our words before we speak, it's not fun to us to talk that way but whatever

floats your boat.
"Know better" and "grab her p" is not even translatable from one to the other, not even in VJ lingo. It is just a watered down statement that says I didn't kill him,
I just tickled him with a gun and he liked it. OR.....I can shoot and kill anyone on the street and they would still like me. It's insane. It's really insane for a so called prez.
He is so arrogant, vulgar and full of hot air that if you hang a basket under his chin he would sail to the highest skies.

In the link I posted it states the lawsuit was filed twice and states the  reason why it was not further pursued each time. (Katie Johnson).

 

In a nut shell the intent of my posts were to point out the hypocrisy and that they are all wrong for their behavior. If you find it acceptable language
then we certainly disagree as I liken his behavior to that of a sexual predator. You want a conviction I gather before you call it wrong but there is such
a thing as walking the edge constantly and getting away with it until one day you lose the game. Morals have been lost long ago by Trump, he doesn't care

because he is rich and famous and can do what he wants according to the words out of his mouth. His attitude will catch up with him and I believe we will
see him getting increasingly blinded by power and display further predatory behavior against women.

 

I just thought I would point out that the vast majority of your previous predictions were completely wrong. This one is no different than your previous ones.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

1 hour ago, eieio said:

I just thought I would point out that the vast majority of your previous predictions were completely wrong. This one is no different than your previous ones.

What previous predictions ? Mind linking me up ?

[NYCruiser 423]

On 10/12/2017 at 1:44 PM, CaliCat said:

 

Couldn't say. All we know is Trump is as much a sexual predator as Weinstein. 

Then where WAS (is) the outrage against Weinstein? They coddled him, took his donations etc...INCLUDING Obama and Clinton

[jg121783 3,915]

On 10/12/2017 at 12:44 PM, CaliCat said:

 

Couldn't say. All we know is Trump is as much a sexual predator as Weinstein. 

So Trump talking about (I will admit the conversation was in bad taste) grabbing women that throw themselves on him with their consent somehow makes him a predator equal to Weinstein? I don't think so. Weinstein did what he did without consent. There is zero evidence to suggest Trump did anything to any woman that wasn't consensual. This a false equivalency the left is desperately trying to make.

[CaliCat 3,957]

Yes, Trump admitting to sexual harassment and assault in considered far beyond bad taste, in this country. Trump is no different than Weinstein, and every bit as much a predator.

 

The equivalence you refer to is not something that is trying to be made, it's one that exists on its own merit, whether you like it or not. 

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

23 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

So Trump talking about (I will admit the conversation was in bad taste) grabbing women that throw themselves on him with their consent somehow makes him a predator equal to Weinstein? I don't think so. Weinstein did what he did without consent. There is zero evidence to suggest Trump did anything to any woman that wasn't consensual. This a false equivalency the left is desperately trying to make.

No. He did this to women who wanted no part of it and were repulsed by it. He then stopped when told no. He was still wrong for treating women as objects
to grab. Weinstein took it further and did not stop when told no. Both are wrong, don't sugar coat it for Trump and say women threw themselves at him, in his mind
he is God's gift to women who worship him, not in reality.

[CaliCat 3,957]

Just now, Ebunoluwa said:

No. He did this to women who wanted no part of it and were repulsed by it. He then stopped when told no. He was still wrong for treating women as objects
to grab. Weinstein took it further and did not stop when told no. Both are wrong, don't sugar coat it for Trump and say women threw themselves at him, in his mind
he is God's gift to women who worship him, not in reality.

 

That is partially true. Melania threw herself at him for a green card. 

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

40 minutes ago, NYCruiser said:

Then where WAS (is) the outrage against Weinstein? They coddled him, took his donations etc...INCLUDING Obama and Clinton

Fake news. They did.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-speaks-out-on-harvey-weinstein-allegations/

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

1 minute ago, CaliCat said:

 

That is partially true. Melania threw herself at him for a green card. 

You got me there.
But yes, there are always a few women like that chasing wealth and power but to say every time he groped a woman it was consensual is not true.

[CaliCat 3,957]

Just now, Ebunoluwa said:

You got me there.
But yes, there are always a few women like that chasing wealth and power but to say every time he groped a woman it was consensual is not true.

 

And Melania also made sure the had a child born in the US, just in case... 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

16 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

No. He did this to women who wanted no part of it and were repulsed by it. He then stopped when told no. He was still wrong for treating women as objects
to grab. Weinstein took it further and did not stop when told no. Both are wrong, don't sugar coat it for Trump and say women threw themselves at him, in his mind
he is God's gift to women who worship him, not in reality.

This is all you need to know about this race fans "" He then stopped when told no"

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

4 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

This is all you need to know about this race fans "" He then stopped when told no"

That makes it ok to back someone into a wall and grab their genitals ? If that happened to me he would have a black eye and a knee between his legs.
Him stopping doesn't make it right, you shouldn't have to fight a guy off. Still a sexual predator.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, Ebunoluwa said:

No. He did this to women who wanted no part of it and were repulsed by it. He then stopped when told no. He was still wrong for treating women as objects
to grab. Weinstein took it further and did not stop when told no. Both are wrong, don't sugar coat it for Trump and say women threw themselves at him, in his mind
he is God's gift to women who worship him, not in reality.

 No and no.  This is the OPPOSITE of sexual harassment.  Continuing after being told no... That's when the crime happens.