How top NBC executives quashed the bombshell Harvey Weinstein story

[CaliCat 3,957]

4 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

see the problem is, you keep bringing up trump when all roads lead to clinton. the wife, not the husband. he's just a liability.

 

True. Facts and reality are so passe... LOL. 

[Póg mo 1,749]

I don't recall this level outrage from "right" leaning members when Fox news was firing so many of its stars for inappropriate sexual conduct. It is almost as if outrage is reserved solely for the Clintons. Trump can talk grabbing woman by the whohaa, and you lot don't say anything. Strange that is it not? 

[Boiler 46,118]

12 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

I don't recall this level outrage from "right" leaning members when Fox news was firing so many of its stars for inappropriate sexual conduct. It is almost as if outrage is reserved solely for the Clintons. Trump can talk grabbing woman by the whohaa, and you lot don't say anything. Strange that is it not? 

We do not really have many "right" leaning members, some may be a bit right of middle of the road, I assume by members you are not meaning something else? Obviously I do not know in which direction Harvey and Bill's member leaned, nor do I. VJ is a family friendly site.

 

Do not follow Fox so difficult for me to comment, but from what I heard looking at it from the left of center the head honcho was a nasty creep.

 

Big thing with this issue is that they did it and came from the holier than thou category. Always thought Trump was a sleaze so making sleazy comments is hardly surprising.

[CaliCat 3,957]

24 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

I don't recall this level outrage from "right" leaning members when Fox news was firing so many of its stars for inappropriate sexual conduct. It is almost as if outrage is reserved solely for the Clintons. Trump can talk grabbing woman by the whohaa, and you lot don't say anything. Strange that is it not? 

 

Rather strange, but predictable. Look at the Tim Murphy scandal, who suggested his lover had an abortion, all the while defending the sanctity of life and all that bs that comes with the GOP these days. Then you have the so-called president, admitting on camera to harassing women sexually. 

I mean, it it were not true, it would make for a B movie for television. 

[Ban Hammer 13,552]

[Póg mo 1,749]

23 minutes ago, Boiler said:

We do not really have many "right" leaning members,

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

10 hours ago, smilesammich said:

ya'll are crazy. 

 

"when you're a star - they let you do anything" 

 

 

 

 

It’s y’all, not ya’ll.  Technically, it’s “all y’all”, since you are referring to more than one.  Y’all is singular.

 

And hear, hear.  (As opposed to here, here).

Edited October 14, 2017 by IDWAF

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

4 hours ago, Póg mo said:

I don't recall this level outrage from "right" leaning members when Fox news was firing so many of its stars for inappropriate sexual conduct. It is almost as if outrage is reserved solely for the Clintons. Trump can talk grabbing woman by the whohaa, and you lot don't say anything. Strange that is it not? 

The key word in your post is " Talk"

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

3 hours ago, Póg mo said:

I am pretty much alone in the middle of the road , since lost in blue left 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

4 hours ago, Póg mo said:

I don't recall this level outrage from "right" leaning members when Fox news was firing so many of its stars for inappropriate sexual conduct. It is almost as if outrage is reserved solely for the Clintons. Trump can talk grabbing woman by the whohaa, and you lot don't say anything. Strange that is it not? 

Can one now be tried, convicted, and sentenced based on his or her talk (sexual in nature, not related to national security)?  Or must he/she actually be guilty of committing a crime?  Asking for a friend...

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

5 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

It’s y’all, not ya’ll.  Technically, it’s “all y’all”, since you are referring to more than one.  Y’all is singular.

 

And hear, hear.  (As opposed to here, here).

U too is of te chain 

[Ban Hammer 13,552]

this pretty much sums it all up

https://medium.com/@a_sharp_writer/harvey-weinstein-and-the-death-of-liberal-america-2901c268b4e9

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

11 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

this pretty much sums it all up

https://medium.com/@a_sharp_writer/harvey-weinstein-and-the-death-of-liberal-america-2901c268b4e9

Plus 1 million and 1.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

19 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

this pretty much sums it all up

https://medium.com/@a_sharp_writer/harvey-weinstein-and-the-death-of-liberal-america-2901c268b4e9

Nailed it 

[Boiler 46,118]

1 hour ago, IDWAF said:

Can one now be tried, convicted, and sentenced based on his or her talk (sexual in nature, not related to national security)?  Or must he/she actually be guilty of committing a crime?  Asking for a friend...

Obviously depends on your friends political persuasion.