As Democrats denounce Weinstein, Clintons and Obama stay mum

[jg121783 3,921]

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/09/politics/clinton-obama-weinstein/index.html

 

Since they aren't immediately disavowing him by the standards of the left they both support sexual predators and rapists.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

6 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/09/politics/clinton-obama-weinstein/index.html

 

Since they aren't immediately disavowing him by the standards of the left they both support sexual predators and rapists.

Seeing how he has donated a million dollars to all campaigns since 2000, it seems funny that anyone would even figure he was a factor in politics.  But hey why let the chance to demonize those you disagree with as immoral pervs stand in the way of facts?

[smilesammich 10,727]

4 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

Seeing how he has donated a million dollars to all campaigns since 2000, it seems funny that anyone would even figure he was a factor in politics.  But hey why let the chance to demonize those you disagree with as immoral pervs stand in the way of facts?

say.. how often do you grab a slice from comet ping pong? 

[jg121783 3,921]

24 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

Seeing how he has donated a million dollars to all campaigns since 2000, it seems funny that anyone would even figure he was a factor in politics.  But hey why let the chance to demonize those you disagree with as immoral pervs stand in the way of facts?

How is this any different from a few fringe Nazis supporting republicans then those republicans being accused of being Nazis for not immediately disavowing and democrats claiming they affected the outcome of the elections? I fail to see the difference. Oh the difference is democrats are above reproach for some unknown reason.

[smilesammich 10,727]

5 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

How is this any different from a few fringe Nazis supporting republicans then those republicans being accused of being Nazis for not immediately disavowing and democrats claiming they affected the outcome of the elections? I fail to see the difference. Oh the difference is democrats are above reproach for some unknown reason.

i haven't seen anyone accuse republicans of being nazis.

[jg121783 3,921]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i haven't seen anyone accuse republicans of being nazis.

 

Yeah now that the hypocracy has been pointed out all of a sudden it never happened. I recall people posting on numerous occasions on these forums about that very subject. I guess some on the left have a selective memory.

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, jg121783 said:

 

Yeah now that the hypocracy has been pointed out all of a sudden it never happened. I recall people posting on numerous occasions on these forums about that very subject. I guess some on the left have a selective memory.

i don't think republicans are all alt right. that's like saying all democrats are socialists and that's absurd. but by all means, post links if you can dig them up.

[jg121783 3,921]

4 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i don't think republicans are all alt right. that's like saying all democrats are socialists and that's absurd. but by all means, post links if you can dig them up.

Well one easy example of a Republican being called a Nazi for not immediately disavowing the fringe Nazis  (even though he disavowed repeatedly) is Trump. If that is the standard Trump and other republicans were held to how is it unfair to hold democrats to the same standard regarding a sexual predator and rapist who supports them (and who they refuse to disavow)?

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

9 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

 

Yeah now that the hypocracy has been pointed out all of a sudden it never happened. I recall people posting on numerous occasions on these forums about that very subject. I guess some on the left have a selective memory.

Show me, I am still wound up by someone accusing me of accusing others of being Nazis on this site so I will look forward your proof. Of course, if it is like all other times you will not be able to come through.

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, jg121783 said:

Well one easy example of a Republican being called a Nazi for not immediately disavowing the fringe Nazis  (even though he disavowed repeatedly) is Trump. If that is the standard Trump and other republicans were held to how is it unfair to hold democrats to the same standard regarding a sexual predator and rapist who supports them (and who they refuse to disavow)?

so one faux republican is now all republicans? the standard for calling someone a nazi, as i know it, is identifying a person who wants the genocide of of those they deem beneath them and/or chants 'jews will not replace us' by tiki torch light. trump, as i recall, called these specimens 'fine people'.  i wouldn't call trump a nazi, but maybe a nazi sympathizer.

still..i haven't seen anyone say republicans are nazis.

[jg121783 3,921]

1 minute ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

Show me, I am still wound up by someone accusing me of accusing others of being Nazis on this site so I will look forward your proof. Of course, if it is like all other times you will not be able to come through.

So Trump was never called a Nazi or white supremacist for allegedly not disavowing these fringe groups (even though he disavowed multiple times)?

[jg121783 3,921]

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

so one faux republican is now all republicans? the standard for calling someone a nazi, as i know it, is identifying a person who wants the genocide of of those they deem beneath them and/or chants 'jews will not replace us' by tiki torch light. trump, as i recall, called these specimens 'fine people'.  i wouldn't call trump a nazi, but maybe a nazi sympathizer.

still..i haven't seen anyone say republicans are nazis.

Well I recall differently. I recall him saying there were bad people on both sides (and there were).

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Well I recall differently. I recall him saying there were bad people on both sides (and there were).

your recall needs to be recalled

3 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

So Trump was never called a Nazi or white supremacist for allegedly not disavowing these fringe groups (even though he disavowed multiple times)?

So why are you asking me when you stated it to be a fact?  

[jg121783 3,921]

Enough mental gymnastics here. I'll just call it for what it is. The left can label people on the right as Nazis, white supremacists, ect. for not disavowing each one of these groups by name (even when they do disavow). But how dare you criticize people on the left for not disavowing (and even in some cases publicly supporting) a sexual predator. That's the truth of the matter and if you can't accept that that is your own problem.

[smilesammich 10,727]

9 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Enough mental gymnastics here. I'll just call it for what it is. The left can label people on the right as Nazis, white supremacists, ect. for not disavowing each one of these groups by name (even when they do disavow). But how dare you criticize people on the left for not disavowing (and even in some cases publicly supporting) a sexual predator. That's the truth of the matter and if you can't accept that that is your own problem.

well gee. why didn't you just lay the law down with your op, no one would have bothered commenting.