Divorce with current k1 sponsor before AOS, found new love - questions!

[NYCruiser 423]

3 hours ago, JFH said:

OP, I'm guessing you're originally from a country where same-sex partnerships are not widely accepted. I have seen this a few times here before - marry someone of the opposite sex, quickly divorce on the basis of "cheating" and begin a relationship with the same-sex partner once safely in the USA where the relationship is accepted.

 

Be prepared for a lot of scrutiny. If I've seen a few cases in my time on this forum alone, how many do you think USCIS have seen? They know every trick in the book. It's hard to believe that someone could meet and get to the stage of wanting to marry someone in less than 6 months (especially after the pain of infidelity and a broken marriage) but even harder to believe someone changed sexual orientation in that short timeframe too. Normally after a spouse cheats it takes a very long time for the other partner to be able to trust again. Let alone want to marry. 

Wait what? LOL. I missed that the 'new love' is a MAN? Ok then FRAUD pure and simple. One does not become gay in a few days. This OP trying to circumvent the legal process. What country are they from?

[NYCruiser 423]

14 hours ago, CodieM said:

You can’t help who you fall in love with and when especially when your husband was cheating. So please don’t go and assume you know and voice your unwanted opinions. I was simply asking if what I heard was correct. 

Wait..you said Husband was cheating? You CodieM are a WOMAN and your K1 was through your Cheating Husband. Now you have a GIRLFRIEND???? That is a woman right> LOL

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, NYCruiser said:

Wait..you said Husband was cheating? You CodieM are a WOMAN and your K1 was through your Cheating Husband. Now you have a GIRLFRIEND???? That is a woman right> LOL

 

5 minutes ago, NYCruiser said:

Wait what? LOL. I missed that the 'new love' is a MAN? Ok then FRAUD pure and simple. One does not become gay in a few days. This OP trying to circumvent the legal process. What country are they from?

Yeah I had to go back and look to. This does not look good at all from any viewpoint at all. 

 

I am not against same sex marriages at all but this just reeks of something nefarious. 

[Mina90 134]

This thread is a roller coaster. LOL.

[NYCruiser 423]

9 minutes ago, cyberfx1024 said:

 

Yeah I had to go back and look to. This does not look good at all from any viewpoint at all. 

 

I am not against same sex marriages at all but this just reeks of something nefarious. 

I am in a same sex relationship. My spouse is from Africa, so......enough said.

[JFH 12,190]

20 hours ago, CodieM said:

 Once the divorce is finalized I can submit a new petition with my new girlfriend

 

14 hours ago, CodieM said:

You can’t help who you fall in love with and when especially when your husband was cheating. So please don’t go and assume you know and voice your unwanted opinions. I was simply asking if what I heard was correct. 

So the original petitioner was male (husband) but OP wants to marry a girlfriend. 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, NYCruiser said:

I am in a same sex relationship. My spouse is from Africa, so......enough said.

So true. I am all for people being happy that's what counts in my book. My feelings have came around to that since my little sister came out to me and let me meet her fiance at that time and now wife. It turns out that Kix(nickname) treats her great and they are happy together and that's all that counts. So that changed my feelings on it because it became personal for me so I had to take a long hard look at myself. But in this situation this just reeks of fraud and trying to circumvent the system. 

1 minute ago, JFH said:

 

So the original petitioner was male (husband) but OP wants to marry a girlfriend. 

Yep basically. 

[trudi 1,317]

4 minutes ago, JFH said:

 

So the original petitioner was male (husband) but OP wants to marry a girlfriend. 

Ignoring the fact that AOS can only be done with the consent and support of the petitioner, there is 0% chance that USCIS is not going to notice the abrupt change of sexuality.

 

Looks a lot like a marriage of convenience from at least your part ( based purely on your posts) and convincing USCIS it isn't is going to be very, very hard.

 

[AshMarty 360]

People are getting very distracted from the OP original question. I thought the point was to give guidance and not judgment on this forum.

 

I believe she already received some good advice about having to leave the country and reapply for her K1 through her new girlfriend. Immigration will decide whether they feel this scenario is questionable or not.  

 

Edited October 11, 2017 by AshMarty

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

5 minutes ago, AshMarty said:

People are getting very distracted from the OP original question. I thought the point was to give guidance and not judgment on this forum.

 

I believe she already received some good advice about having to leave the country and reapply for her K1 through her new girlfriend. Immigration will decide whether they feel this scenario is questionable or not.  

 

I am not doing judgement at all but I am evaluating all the circumstances involved just like USCIS will as well. This looks bad on all levels at the very least and I doubt USCIS won't think that as well. 

Edited October 11, 2017 by cyberfx1024

[AshMarty 360]

1 minute ago, cyberfx1024 said:

I am not doing judgement at all but I am evaluating all the circumstances involved just like USCIS will as well. 

Not your comments in particular but people are getting very distracted and not offering constructive advice.

 

There is a difference between saying the case will likely be under scrutiny because of the scenario or just telling someone they are committing fraud and not offering the constructive route if she were to reapply. That is all.

 

[Pennycat 880]

2 hours ago, Kastrs said:

Just because they are divorced/in the process of getting a divorce does not mean the petitioner would not attend the interview, so IF the petitioner does not pull the AoS and attended the interview if there is one, then the OP could be approved for a GC and not have to leave the country

 

 

No no no! If they are in the process of getting divorced and they go to the AOS interview together pretending to be a happy couple, that is BIG time trouble right there. Like misrepresentation kind of trouble. They're getting divorced before AOS is complete. There simply isn't a path to stay unless that relationship is (legitimately) salvaged. 

 

2 hours ago, BuiQuang said:

what u heard is inccorect

 

haha again ppl who come here help, get good answers, and laugh at VJ members who help. haha we are not the one with the problem.

 

k-1 + San Bernadino k1 Muslim shooter + Trump = every k1 is getting interviewed.  this is why there is slowdown.  trump's increase scrutiny.

 

u will not pass k1 interview without ur husband.  no real marriage = no green card.  that simple.

 

 

Are 100% of K1s being interviewed now? We didn't, and we went through after San Bernardo (but before Trump... barely). 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, AshMarty said:

Not your comments in particular but people are getting very distracted and not offering constructive advice.

 

There is a difference between saying the case will likely be under scrutiny because of the scenario or just telling someone they are committing fraud and not offering the constructive route if she were to reapply. That is all.

 

People have offered constructive criticism to the OP and she has just brushed it aside. This happens alot on here on VJ is that someone comes on and posts a question like this and does not get the response he/she likes, they get mad and we never hear from them again. 

 

The advice she was given is that she has to go back to the her country of origin and her new fiance has to file a K1 for her. But she did not want to hear it at all.

[Kastrs 723]

56 minutes ago, MacUK said:

What? You want the petitioner to go to the interview and lie? To tell the interviewer that they're still happily married?

Are you trying to get people into serious trouble?

No, I never did nor will I ever advise lying

It is not a lie to still provide the AoS even if undergoing divorce nor already divorced

Please check matter of sesay, which has also been previously mentioned in this thread

[Kastrs 723]

53 minutes ago, JFH said:

I'm glad someone picked up on that. I can see the AoS not being pulled - the original petitioner may not know how or even feel that he should waste his time. But the interview is something else. 

please see matter of sesay

there is nothing wrong with going to an interview together if called and being honest about the status of your relationship