"Trump administration introduces green card hurdle"

[csk2b1 44]

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/25/trump-administration-green-card-hurdle-242050

[IAMX 3,055]

Excellent, more vetting to make sure fewer nutcase terrorists and their sympathizers enter the country.

 

Downside is, less potential Democrat voters.

[Boiler 45,402]

Interesting, I did not realise so many got a pass.

[IAMX 3,055]

1 minute ago, Boiler said:

Interesting, I did not realise so many got a pass.

A lot of prior administration stupidity to undo.

[LionessDeon 2,060]

1 minute ago, IAMX said:

A lot of prior administration stupidity to undo.

Can I ask you a question?

why can't you just agree with the new requirement and leave out the rude negativity?  Are you purposely doing it to bait people or is that just your personality?  I often see your comments and they all seem to follow this same trend of yours.  I just wondered. 

 

In relation to the OP. Seems like a very good idea. A cost increase I'm sure but necessary for homeland security. 

[IAMX 3,055]

3 minutes ago, LionessDeon said:

Can I ask you a question?

why can't you just agree with the new requirement and leave out the rude negativity?  Are you purposely doing it to bait people or is that just your personality?  I often see your comments and they all seem to follow this same trend of yours.  I just wondered. 

Question, why don't you make these sort of comments in all the Trump bashing/whining threads? Or in all these hardly-political topics that turn into people crying about Trump and spreading their negativity?

Edited August 26, 2017 by IAMX

[LionessDeon 2,060]

4 minutes ago, IAMX said:

Question, why don't you make these sort of comments in all the Trump bashing/whining threads? Or in all these hardly-political topics that turn into people crying about Trump and spreading their negativity?

Which sorts of comments?  Asking you about you or what I said about the OP? 

 

About you - like I said I read your comments and the others. It just seems you always throw in a condescending jab at liberals, democrats, the left, etc and then the thread spirals into a ####### for tat.  Very similar to this thread so I guess that's why I decided to ask now since it's been on my mind. In this particular thread you are the only one making jabs at democrats and the stupidity of Obama. You have every right to free speech.  I'm just wondering why you feel the need to take it there constantly? You can agree/disagree without the insulting comments. It doesn't matter what others do. Whining about trump has nothing to do with you making insulting comments to others. I liked Obama very much. When people whine and make ridiculous statements about him I don't feel the need to make insulting comments about republicans, the right, conservatives, etc. I was just wondering why.  You don't have to answer.  

 

 

[IAMX 3,055]

2 minutes ago, LionessDeon said:

Which sorts of comments?  Asking you about you or what I said about the OP? 

 

About you - like I said I read your comments and the others. It just seems you always throw in a condescending jab at liberals, democrats, the left, etc and then the thread spirals into a ####### for tat.  Very similar to this thread so I guess that's why I decided to ask now since it's been on my mind. In this particular thread you are the only one making jabs at democrats and the stupidity of Obama. You have every right to free speech.  I'm just wondering why you feel the need to take it there constantly? You can agree/disagree without the insulting comments. It doesn't matter what others do. Whining about trump has nothing to do with you making insulting comments to others. I liked Obama very much. When people whine and make ridiculous statements about him I don't feel the need to make insulting comments about republicans, the right, conservatives, etc. I was just wondering why.  You don't have to answer.  

 

 

 

 

 

[LionessDeon 2,060]

Oh yea block each other is a definite option.  I was just trying to understand where you were coming from. You may valuable information or viewpoints.  I like to listen to everyone's opinions. Unfortunately, I tend not to see them over the insults. 

 

[Jacque67 7,328]

1 minute ago, LionessDeon said:

Oh yea block each other is a definite option.  I was just trying to understand where you were coming from. You may valuable information or viewpoints.  I like to listen to everyone's opinions. Unfortunately, I tend not to see them over the insults. 

 

Hmm.

[IAMX 3,055]

3 minutes ago, LionessDeon said:

Oh yea block each other is a definite option.  I was just trying to understand where you were coming from. You may valuable information or viewpoints.  I like to listen to everyone's opinions. Unfortunately, I tend not to see them over the insults. 

 

You also have the option of PM. 

[LionessDeon 2,060]

49 minutes ago, IAMX said:

You also have the option of PM. 

True.  Didnt mean to call you out publicly. Sorry about that. 

[ready4ONE 5,400]

It appears that this is simply the implementation of a policy already on the books, but waived due to the fact it created inefficiency and longer wait times for marginal benefit. Looks like Donald Trump is simply ignoring hard earned experience and satisfying his innate fear of "others."

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Don't see the issue with this rule.  The majority of us here had to do the same thing, right?

[spookyturtle 9,465]

20 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

Don't see the issue with this rule.  The majority of us here had to do the same thing, right?

Agreed. Why should there be a problem with an interview?