Special Counsel Mueller focuses on Trump's son

[CaliCat 3,957]

1 minute ago, cyberfx1024 said:

The press or MSM is feasting on it because there are anything Anti-Trump even if it is made up BS. They will jump on it and make it out to be some faux outrage how bad Trump is. That is the ONLY reason that CNN has any kind of ratings at all. 

 

Perhaps you're right, but if there's nothing to be found, this too, will go away. This could be Trump's Benghazi for all we know, and nothing will be proven, because there is nothing to prove. 

Edited August 18, 2017 by CaliCat

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, CaliCat said:

 

And I didn't mean to suggest you fabricated it. What I did mean was that regardless of who and how they are getting the information, the information exists. For all I know this may be another big fat dish of nothing, but I also think we should err on the side of caution. 

I am all about caution honestly and having a open and honest investigation. But I think whoever is leaking them things is flat out getting PAID off of CNN and trying to keep the money train going so to speak by feeding even more lies. I may be wrong but that is my opinion that who is doing this is doing it for financial gain from the Media. 

 

[CaliCat 3,957]

1 minute ago, cyberfx1024 said:

I am all about caution honestly and having a open and honest investigation. But I think whoever is leaking them things is flat out getting PAID off of CNN and trying to keep the money train going so to speak by feeding even more lies. I may be wrong but that is my opinion that who is doing this is doing it for financial gain from the Media. 

 

 

We'll know once Muller is done with it. Ultimately, it's his job to see this through, press or no press. 

[JimandChristy 1,689]

 

Sometimes revenge is a dish best served cold

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

6 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

 

Sometimes revenge is a dish best served cold

Why? We have no evidence supporting any kind of crime at this point in time and I don't believe that we ever will either. But with Hillary we had a boatload of evidence that she willfully violated her security clearance and used a unsecure to send/receive/store Top Secret SCI emails on it. Which BTW was and still is against the law. You might not know the laws considering classifications and the punishments of violating them but I do. I have had a Secret Clearance in the past, and I am going for my Top Secret as we speak. If I did even a 10th of what she did I would be in jail right now, and that is a fact.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

If you want to spout of some BS about something you have no idea about. Then how about asking someone who actually knows about it and could give you a tip or two non-partisan just facts. I get tired of people and the MSM talking about things they have no idea about and acting like they are experts, when in reality it makes you look like a fool by those of us who know.

[IAMX 3,055]

1 hour ago, cyberfx1024 said:

Why? We have no evidence supporting any kind of crime at this point in time and I don't believe that we ever will either. But with Hillary we had a boatload of evidence that she willfully violated her security clearance and used a unsecure to send/receive/store Top Secret SCI emails on it. Which BTW was and still is against the law. You might not know the laws considering classifications and the punishments of violating them but I do. I have had a Secret Clearance in the past, and I am going for my Top Secret as we speak. If I did even a 10th of what she did I would be in jail right now, and that is a fact.

Emotional people, emotional times.

 

 

Didn't see the "revenge" part.. it's like being back in high school. Oh noes he made a slogan against muh friend Hillary, better get revenge!

Edited August 18, 2017 by IAMX

[JimandChristy 1,689]

22 minutes ago, IAMX said:

Emotional people, emotional times.

 

 

Didn't see the "revenge" part.. it's like being back in high school. Oh noes he made a slogan against muh friend Hillary, better get revenge!

I mention revenge because at the Republican convention the whole lock her up chant was pathetic. So pathetic that they took the White House and aren't even trying to lock up Clinton.

[Jacque67 7,328]

Diaper Donnie, 39, tweets this 7 or so hours ago....

 

The most interesting measure of a fried (sic) is the difference between their personal texts to you and their FB posts.

 

hahaha! Deep!

[jg121783 3,921]

13 hours ago, CaliCat said:

 

Isn't that the purpose of investigations? To make sure that in a country of laws, no one should stand above them? 

Usually for an investigation to take place you have to have at least one piece of probable cause evidence. In this case none exists. If this was an investigation into anyone but Trump or his associates it would have been called off a long time ago for lack of evidence. But this is Trump so it will continue on until 2020 and beyond.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

17 hours ago, cyberfx1024 said:

 

So why after almost a year already are there not some kind of charges coming? We heard a couple weeks ago about some kind of grand jury coming, we still have yet to see that happen or if it did happen any kind of charges. I think it's just a load of BS right now. It's like the MSM keep trying to do some kind of "Outrage of the week" in order to divide us so that whomever can just come over here and conquer us. You do forget a majority of the Left Wing groups are funded in whole or in part by George Soros and his minions, in which he hasn't liked the USA since we beat the Nazis in WW2.

The Grand Jury is a secretive process. Those who have been subpoenaed can talk about their testimony,  but why would they?

Manafort and Flynn were two individuals who were core to the campaign that will be brought to justice over their willful and intentional breach foreign  agent and other laws. Manafort was the campaign chair,Flynn held the most sensitive national security post despite the warnings of the previous President. 

 

 

The outcome of the special investigation does not need to respurpose criminal charges to have fulfilled it purpose. Ethics charges, special reccomendations of censure or impeachment, recommmanipulas for improved procedures are all things that can be produced. A special investigator with a grand jury is actually far more reliable than congressional investigations that will always look political. 

 

  If it makes our country more secure and insulated from the types of well documented attempts to manipulate the American voter and insure that our voice is the only one that counts. Lets let Mueller do his job.

[jg121783 3,921]

2 hours ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

The Grand Jury is a secretive process. Those who have been subpoenaed can talk about their testimony,  but why would they?

Manafort and Flynn were two individuals who were core to the campaign that will be brought to justice over their willful and intentional breach foreign  agent and other laws. Manafort was the campaign chair,Flynn held the most sensitive national security post despite the warnings of the previous President. 

 

 

The outcome of the special investigation does not need to respurpose criminal charges to have fulfilled it purpose. Ethics charges, special reccomendations of censure or impeachment, recommmanipulas for improved procedures are all things that can be produced. A special investigator with a grand jury is actually far more reliable than congressional investigations that will always look political. 

 

  If it makes our country more secure and insulated from the types of well documented attempts to manipulate the American voter and insure that our voice is the only one that counts. Lets let Mueller do his job.

How does a witch hunt make our country more secure? Where are these well documented attempts to manipulate the American voter? Mueller's job is to investigate alleged Russian meddling. Not to put out a drag net and pursue Trump and his associates for a crooked toe nail.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

26 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

How does a witch hunt make our country more secure? Where are these well documented attempts to manipulate the American voter? Mueller's job is to investigate alleged Russian meddling. Not to put out a drag net and pursue Trump and his associates for a crooked toe nail.

The Republicans and The Right have a lock on witch hunts, spending millions and decades on the still free and clear Clintons. Kind of silly to put a time limit on investigating Herr Komrade Trump in the face of the Clinton "investigations."

[JimandChristy 1,689]

Clinton investigations fair game but Donnie investigations witch hunt.

[IAMX 3,055]

2 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

The Republicans and The Right have a lock on witch hunts

 

2 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

 

Herr Komrade Trump