"white pride" vs "black pride"

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, jg121783 said:

I am in good company because the FBI doesn't think they should be trusted either. Do you deny George Soros is a leftist? It's undeniable he is a Nazi.

you don't think the fbi is to be trusted, lol  george soros has nothing to do with blm and i'm pretty sure he wasn't at saturday's rally whining 'jews will not replace us"

[IAMX 3,055]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

I am in good company because the FBI doesn't think they should be trusted either. Do you deny George Soros is a leftist? It's undeniable he is a Nazi.

Not even Soros' own country trusts him, especially due to his financial support of not only localized terrorism but funding groups that incite violence at peaceful rallies (e.g. Trump rallies).

 

Hungary: You can have him USA.

[Jacque67 7,328]

11 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

you don't think the fbi is to be trusted, lol  george soros has nothing to do with blm and i'm pretty sure he wasn't at saturday's rally whining 'jews will not replace us"

You mean this Soros?

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/02/report-jared-kushner-didnt-disclose-1-billion-loans-investment-ties-goldman-sachs-george-soros/

 

javanka's buddy? The guy they hangout with in the Hamptons?

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Jacque67 said:

You mean this Soros?

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/02/report-jared-kushner-didnt-disclose-1-billion-loans-investment-ties-goldman-sachs-george-soros/

 

javanka's buddy? The guy they hangout with in the Hamptons?

the nazis are really grossed out by filthy kushner landing such a hot 'white' wife..

[Jacque67 7,328]

13 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

the nazis are really grossed out by filthy kushner landing such a hot 'white' wife..

Jared's welcome to plastic Ivanka!

[Penguin_ie 5,993]

***** One TOS breeching post and those quoting removed.  Post civilly or do not post. ************

[bcking 3,157]

1 hour ago, IAMX said:

 

Pride is feeling satisfaction for one's achievements or qualities.

 

Someone who is in a minority group can feel pride for being apart of that minority group and achieving success (or even just pride for representing that minority group).

 

I'm not really sure why a white person would feel proud for being a white person. It's not hard to be white, it isn't an achievement.

 

Talk about snowflakes, do all these white supremacists really need pats on the back and a "Good job!"? If that's all it is, then I'll gladly give them a thumbs up if it helps build up their fragile ego.

[IAMX 3,055]

Just now, bcking said:

do all these white supremacists really need pats on the back

Ask them.

[Eric-Pris 1,606]

5 hours ago, JayJayH said:

Why "black pride" makes sense and "white pride" doesn't:

 

Unless you're a recent immigrant from Africa, most black Americans cannot trace their ancestry to any specific region or culture other than West Africa, a region roughly the size of the US. The one specifically traceable and unifying history most black Americans have is distinctly and uniquely African-American, which is obviously directly tied to being black in America. Not Ghanaian, not Nigerian, not Congolese.

very convenient.

[LionessDeon 2,060]

2 minutes ago, bcking said:

Pride is feeling satisfaction for one's achievements or qualities.

 

Someone who is in a minority group can feel pride for being apart of that minority group and achieving success (or even just pride for representing that minority group).

 

I'm not really sure why a white person would feel proud for being a white person. It's not hard to be white, it isn't an achievement.

 

Talk about snowflakes, do all these white supremacists really need pats on the back and a "Good job!"? If that's all it is, then I'll gladly give them a thumbs up if it helps build up their fragile ego.

I think anyone can be proud to be who they are, white, black, asian, irish, indian....whatever.  But supremacy is different.  Supremacy means you believe your better than everyone else, should be the superior, and/or only.  That's a huge difference.

[bcking 3,157]

Just now, IAMX said:

Ask them.

There is a pretty prominent supporter of many of those "very fine people"

 

Unfortunately he doesn't respond well to questions on this topic. 

[bcking 3,157]

3 minutes ago, Eric-Pris said:

very convenient.

I'm pretty sure people who trace their heritage to slavery wouldn't consider their family history "convenient".

[IAMX 3,055]

14 minutes ago, Eric-Pris said:

very convenient.

Gotta say, if the worst the Nazis did was hit a group of protesters with a car...

 

Of course, we're talking this vs. systematic genocide. Which, to the left, is one and the same. 

 

13 minutes ago, LionessDeon said:

I think anyone can be proud to be who they are, white, black, asian, irish, indian....whatever.  But supremacy is different.  Supremacy means you believe your better than everyone else, should be the superior, and/or only.  That's a huge difference.

The left have blended the idea of pride and supremacy for the sake of convenience and tantrums.

 

11 minutes ago, bcking said:

There is a pretty prominent supporter of many of those "very fine people"

 

Unfortunately he doesn't respond well to questions on this topic. 

Does this person happen to have a Jewish daughter and son in law, to where his alleged support of these white supremacist movements, never mind the conveniently used "Nazi" and "KKK" comparisons, makes no sense whatsoever except for those throwing fits?

 

9 minutes ago, bcking said:

I'm pretty sure people who trace their heritage to slavery wouldn't consider their family history "convenient".

In human history only recently has slavery really begun to be abolished, so pretty much everyone that can trace their heritage far back enough would find the same thing. As to how this translates into the current arguments being made (and ever convenient outrage+embellishments being expressed).. beats me, it doesn't stem from logic anyways.

Edited August 16, 2017 by IAMX

[Eric-Pris 1,606]

13 minutes ago, bcking said:

I'm pretty sure people who trace their heritage to slavery wouldn't consider their family history "convenient".

I'm pretty sure your reading comprehension skills need improvement.  My post is not about the ancestry itself, but the OP statement that blacks can have black pride but whites can't have white pride, because blacks can trace their ancestry to general region of Africa whereas whites trace their ancestry to specific countries.

 

 

Edited August 16, 2017 by Eric-Pris

[LionessDeon 2,060]

1 minute ago, IAMX said:

 

The left have blended the idea of pride and supremacy for the sake of convenience and tantrums.

 

 

I think it's kind of the opposite.  I think people like trump think it's the same thing and that's why the left is getting so outraged.

I do think that lefts sometimes forget that everyone has rights whether you agree with their values or not.  And no one should be inciting violence...on either side.  This is so complicated.  So much of it is about perception, time period, and definitions.