Paul Manafort: FBI 'raided home of former Trump chairman'

[CaliCat 3,957]

2 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I know, the crime Trump committed was beating Hillary.  We need to remove him, and restore her to her rightful place on the throne.

 

 

 

LOL....

[Dashinka 24,437]

11 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

 

LOL....

Great example of those in the MDL.  Regardless, I will ask the same question, what is the underlying crime Mueller is investigating?

[CaliCat 3,957]

2 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Great example of those in the MDL.  Regardless, I will ask the same question, what is the underlying crime Mueller is investigating?

 

It is indeed. Eight months into the Circus and people are still talking about how Trump beat Hillary. He didn't. The electoral college did. Trump himself didn't beat her. Quite the opposite. He lost the popular vote. The electoral college beat Hillary, not Trump. 

[IAMX 3,055]

4 hours ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

You in a greased logic loop. Good luck brother 

 

4 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

I know, the crime Trump committed was beating Hillary.  We need to remove him, and restore her to her rightful place on the throne.

 

 

#NotMyPresident #Resist #ImStillWithHer

 

[JimandChristy 1,689]

1 hour ago, CaliCat said:

 

It is indeed. Eight months into the Circus and people are still talking about how Trump beat Hillary. He didn't. The electoral college did. Trump himself didn't beat her. Quite the opposite. He lost the popular vote. The electoral college beat Hillary, not Trump. 

On the eve of the election 538 had Clinton winning the election by 3.5 percentage points. Clinton actually won by 2.1 percentage points within the margin of error.

 

So were the polls wrong, yes when it came to the electoral college, Trump victory by that count looks convincing but in reality he squeaked by in the Midwest states.

 

65000 votes in three states put him over the edge out of 130 million votes cast. 

Edited August 15, 2017 by JimandChristy

[IAMX 3,055]

26 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

On the eve of the election 538 had Clinton winning the election by 3.5 percentage points. Clinton actually won by 2.1 percentage points within the margin of error.

For the irrelevant national popular vote, yes. Congrats for being with in the margin of error where it doesn't matter.

 

Quote

 

So were the polls wrong, yes when it came to the electoral college, Trump victory by that count looks convincing but in reality he squeaked by in the Midwest states.

 

T 306 - C 232 (reality)

T 216 - C 322 (projected)

 

That's a 30% margin of error where it actually matters. 

 

Regarding 538..

 

T 235 - C 302

 

25% margin of error where it counts.

 

 

 

 

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=2016-senate-forecast

 

 

And that's even ignoring them and virtually everyone else predicting Dems would win the Senate.

 

Only within a margin of error if you keep your margins hilariously wide.

 

The idea that polls mean anything is only from those desperately looking for any straw to grasp. 

Edited August 15, 2017 by IAMX

[JimandChristy 1,689]

57 minutes ago, IAMX said:

For the irrelevant national popular vote, yes. Congrats for being with in the margin of error where it doesn't matter.

 

 

T 306 - C 232 (reality)

T 216 - C 322 (projected)

 

That's a 30% margin of error where it actually matters. 

 

Regarding 538..

 

T 235 - C 302

 

25% margin of error where it counts.

 

 

 

 

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=2016-senate-forecast

 

 

And that's even ignoring them and virtually everyone else predicting Dems would win the Senate.

 

Only within a margin of error if you keep your margins hilariously wide.

 

The idea that polls mean anything is only from those desperately looking for any straw to grasp. 

65000 votes out of 130,000,000 is 0.05% it's one of the narrowest victories in election history.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

43 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

65000 votes out of 130,000,000 is 0.05% it's one of the narrowest victories in election history.

Maybe that's why the butt hurt is so bad. Still a victory none the less

[JimandChristy 1,689]

25 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Maybe that's why the butt hurt is so bad. Still a victory none the less

Yes a victory which at the moment is leading to an epic fail.

 

No major legislation passed, approval rating at 34% despite a good economy. Choked on denouncing White Supremacists. Has fired his FBI Director, his communications director, his press secretary, his Chief of Staff, threatened to fire his Attorney General, his Health and Human Services Secretary. 

Gave a bizarre speech at the CIA, gave a bizarre speech at the Boy Scouts, playground antics with the Leader of North Korea, embracing America's adversary, embracing dictators, attacks democracy by trying to undermine the judicial system, attack McConnell, attack Heller on Health Care, attack the media and the First Amendment and so much more and we're only six months in.

 

The only success he's had is getting Neil Gorsuch to the supreme Court. Which anyone could get done with a list of conservative judges in front of him and having a majority in the Senate.

Edited August 15, 2017 by JimandChristy

[CaliCat 3,957]

31 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Maybe that's why the butt hurt is so bad. Still a victory none the less

 

It is a victory, if you're a trust fund baby, and consider a win anything that someone hands over to you. In some places, a victory is the result of something you earned, which really is not the case with Trump and the election. He didn't win the election. He was handed a win, and I guess that is the main reason he and his supporters are still desperately seeking validation. 

 

The runner up was handed the crown. What a win!

Edited August 15, 2017 by CaliCat

[Jacque67 7,328]

http://www.thedailybeast.com/paul-manafort-sought-dollar850-million-deal-with-putin-ally-and-alleged-gangster

 

connecting the dots ...

[Dashinka 24,437]

On ‎8‎/‎14‎/‎2017 at 8:02 PM, JimandChristy said:

On the eve of the election 538 had Clinton winning the election by 3.5 percentage points. Clinton actually won by 2.1 percentage points within the margin of error.

 

So were the polls wrong, yes when it came to the electoral college, Trump victory by that count looks convincing but in reality he squeaked by in the Midwest states.

 

65000 votes in three states put him over the edge out of 130 million votes cast. 

The Russians rigged the electoral college.  Still haven't received an answer to the question, what crime is being investigated?

 

On ‎8‎/‎14‎/‎2017 at 6:16 PM, CaliCat said:

 

It is indeed. Eight months into the Circus and people are still talking about how Trump beat Hillary. He didn't. The electoral college did. Trump himself didn't beat her. Quite the opposite. He lost the popular vote. The electoral college beat Hillary, not Trump. 

Who cares, that is over, but I see you still haven't answered my question.  What crime is being investigated?