Jump to content
SAT

The Hunger Rants

 Share

2,903 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

A good source for Houston-area disaster coverage is:  www.abc13.com

If it's live like on the real television, it's like a horror movie that you want to stop watching but can't, unwillingly see man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Denmark
Timeline

I'm confused why the people in area where water is now up to the eaves/second floors were not evacuated prior to the storm.

3/2/18  E-filed N-400 under 5 year rule

3/26/18 Biometrics

7/2019-12/2019 (Yes, 16- 21 months) Estimated time to interview MSP office.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
24 minutes ago, N-o-l-a said:

I'm confused why the people in area where water is now up to the eaves/second floors were not evacuated prior to the storm.

As both the Harris County Judge and Mayor of Houston emphasized over & over, there was no telling which areas would flood or how severely, no man.  Accordingly, it made no sense to order evacuations, none man.  (The coastal cities susceptible to storm surge were another matter entirely.)  In addition, no one wanted a repeat of the disastrous Hurricane Rita evacuation, when Many,000 people were stranded on gridlocked outbound routes and more died during that event than from Rita itself, sad man.

 

Indeed, a great Many areas now flooding have never flooded before, no man.

 

But this is what happens consequent to the Earliest City Fathers' having built the place atop a swamp, :bonk: man.

 

After about an hour's respite, raining again here at the casa, how wet we are man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Denmark
Timeline
1 minute ago, TBoneTX said:

As both the Harris County Judge and Mayor of Houston emphasized over & over, there was no telling which areas would flood or how severely, no man.  Accordingly, it made no sense to order evacuations, none man.  (The coastal cities susceptible to storm surge were another matter entirely.)  In addition, no one wanted a repeat of the disastrous Hurricane Rita evacuation, when Many,000 people were stranded on gridlocked outbound routes and more died during that event than from Rita itself, sad man.

 

Indeed, a great Many areas now flooding have never flooded before, no man.

 

But this is what happens consequent to the Earliest City Fathers' having built the place atop a swamp, :bonk: man.

 

After about an hour's respite, raining again here at the casa, how wet we are man.

 

Interesting.  I see that the highway underpasses are very low lying as well - they obviously weren't designed with this issue in mind.  We habitually flood, so our highways and roads are actually built up higher than the surrounding land and abutted by huge ditches that control the water.  I think they used some federal money after the '97 floods to do it.

3/2/18  E-filed N-400 under 5 year rule

3/26/18 Biometrics

7/2019-12/2019 (Yes, 16- 21 months) Estimated time to interview MSP office.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SAT said:

 

You went home already?

 Yes...why?

8 minutes ago, N-o-l-a said:

 

Interesting.  I see that the highway underpasses are very low lying as well - they obviously weren't designed with this issue in mind.  We habitually flood, so our highways and roads are actually built up higher than the surrounding land and abutted by huge ditches that control the water.  I think they used some federal money after the '97 floods to do it.

Calgary never used to flood so their underpasses go quite low and now that the weather patterns have changed, they routinely flood and are impassable.  Like right in the city. 

You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose.  - Dr. Seuss

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
10 minutes ago, N-o-l-a said:

Interesting.  I see that the highway underpasses are very low lying as well - they obviously weren't designed with this issue in mind.  We habitually flood, so our highways and roads are actually built up higher than the surrounding land and abutted by huge ditches that control the water.  I think they used some federal money after the 'Many floods to do it.

Some of the overpasses might have been built after the underpasses were, as ways to avoid habitually flooding areas, dry man.

Some work was done to improve drainage after recent events, efforts man.

However, probably almost anywhere would be flooding under this relentless assault, sigh man.

In addition, several dams & lakes upstream need to be released into waterways that flow toward the Gulf, exacerbation man.

Are you watching via the www.abc13.com link, Nola-B. ma'am?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Among all the now-homeless evacuees who are in grim shock are others to pity, see man:

Drunks who'll run out of booze and smokers who'll run out of cigarettes, DTs and irritability man.

 

After about an hour's respite, again raining like an illegitimate male child, how wet we are man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to follow your link, but I get an 'oops message'. I am watching on tv.

I can explain it to you. But I can't understand it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Denmark
Timeline
17 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Some of the overpasses might have been built after the underpasses were, as ways to avoid habitually flooding areas, dry man.

Some work was done to improve drainage after recent events, efforts man.

However, probably almost anywhere would be flooding under this relentless assault, sigh man.

In addition, several dams & lakes upstream need to be released into waterways that flow toward the Gulf, exacerbation man.

Are you watching via the www.abc13.com link, Nola-B. ma'am?

 

I was watching, like the reporter attempting to talk to people in the shelter and them ignoring her, lol.

 

Mmm, that is likely that they would flood.  Every place has issues, we had days where the interstate is closed because you can't see in front of you for the blowing snow.

3/2/18  E-filed N-400 under 5 year rule

3/26/18 Biometrics

7/2019-12/2019 (Yes, 16- 21 months) Estimated time to interview MSP office.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Malaysia
Timeline
2 hours ago, N-o-l-a said:

I'm confused why the people in area where water is now up to the eaves/second floors were not evacuated prior to the storm.

 

Some people are reluctant to evacuate. 

The day before Sandy hit here, people in Coney Island, Rockaways, long Island, etc. didn't wanna leave either. Even when they were told to. 

A couple of my guys lost their homes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
1 hour ago, cdneh said:

I tried to follow your link, but I get an 'oops message'. I am watching on tv.

You should've gotten a "howdy" message, Eh ma'am.

1 hour ago, N-o-l-a said:

1.  I was watching, like the reporter attempting to talk to people in the shelter and them ignoring her, lol.

2.  we had days where the interstate is closed because you can't see in front of you for the blowing snow.

1.  We might ignore the reporters with some of their dumb questions, too, si man.

2.  We remember that and don't miss any of it, si and no man.

34 minutes ago, SAT said:

1.  Some people are reluctant to evacuate. 

2.  The day before Sandy hit here, people in Coney Island, Rockaways, long Island, etc. didn't wanna leave either. Even when they were told to. 

Many.  A couple of my guys lost their homes.

1.  A rescuer here said that on his first motorboat pass-by, some refused, but when he returned, they relented, change minds man,

2.  They're not used to evacuating up there, no man.

Many.  We can't imagine the insurance losses here, no man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Some really warm-hearting stories here, seen man.

Shelters, with people being brought to them, safe havens man.

Regular citizens (chiefly rednecks) in their own boats, cheerfully rescuing out-flooded families, selfless man.

And cautious prediction of slighly less intense rain tonight than last night, waterlogged already man.

However, another 2 feet of rain possible when himmicane doubles back in a day or two, sigh man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...