July 2017 I-129F Filers

[Gayle&Angelo 27]

On 2018-01-27 at 3:26 PM, Tea_pgtips said:

Yes! We met on instagram! No I didn’t include it on the I-129f... in fact al I said is that we met online and just stated when we met in person. That’s all they care about for the package. I think you do need the terms of service for the interview though!

Is Instagram considered as IMB? We mentioned it on the form that we met through instagram. Is that gonna be a problem??   anyone know more info bout this? 

[JSCGPV 1,903]

19 minutes ago, Gayle&Angelo said:

Is Instagram considered as IMB? We mentioned it on the form that we met through instagram. Is that gonna be a problem??   anyone know more info bout this? 

No. At worst case scenario they would ask for a Terms of Service to prove it's not, but by now I'm sure by 2018 they know what Instagram is. I sure wouldn't sweat it.

 

Definition of an International Marriage Broker. “International marriage broker” is defined as an entity (whether or not U.S.-based) that charges fees for providing matchmaking services or social referrals between U.S. citizens/permanent residents and foreign nationals.

[Gayle&Angelo 27]

2 minutes ago, JSCGPV said:

No. At worst case scenario they would ask for a Terms of Service to prove it's not, but by now I'm sure by 2018 they know what Instagram is. I sure wouldn't sweat it.

 

Definition of an International Marriage Broker. “International marriage broker” is defined as an entity (whether or not U.S.-based) that charges fees for providing matchmaking services or social referrals between U.S. citizens/permanent residents and foreign nationals.

I appreciate your kind help. I got a little nervous. Hopefully all is fine without the TOS and will get noa2 soon. Praying for everyone from 🇬🇧 

[JSCGPV 1,903]

3 minutes ago, Gayle&Angelo said:

I appreciate your kind help. I got a little nervous. Hopefully all is fine without the TOS and will get noa2 soon. Praying for everyone from 🇬🇧 

Your welcome and I Can't say for sure, but I would be really, really, be surprised if you get RFE for that. Even if you did it would be an easy fix.

Edited January 29, 2018 by JSCGPV

[Kat&Joel 484]

Ooooookay July Filers (and anyone prior still waiting).  Leeettt's get ready to ruuuuuuumble!!!!! We are gonna get some more action tomorrow with online and snail mail approvals AND some sweet sweet NVC aaaaaactiiionnnn. Give us those young case #'s!!!  Woooo!!! I wanna see some major action tomorrow.

[Wink.Wink 1]

Just signed in!

 

Hoping to get NOA2 this week! 😊

[Kristi&Luigi 157]

10 hours ago, Kat&Joel said:

On a lighter note. Do you reckon my fiance and I can get married in Vegas? We will be living in Utah but I want an Elvis wedding.

 

10 hours ago, JSCGPV said:

Ha Ha that's what I thought about doing, too. Doesn't matter where as long as it's a legal U.S. wedding within 90 days of P.O.E.

Aw  maybe ill see you all there hehe 

[Sailormooon 268]

6 hours ago, Gayle&Angelo said:

Is Instagram considered as IMB? We mentioned it on the form that we met through instagram. Is that gonna be a problem??   anyone know more info bout this? 

No instagram isn’t a marriage broker!

[Kristi&Luigi 157]

I see a noa1 July 25 on immi timelines  must have been a silent noa2? 

[Naes 12,205]

16 minutes ago, Kristi&Luigi said:

I see a noa1 July 25 on immi timelines  must have been a silent noa2? 

Just as an info;

in vj people put their notice date instead of the received date. Online updates are based on received dates. So some of those dates are not accurate according to website.

 

also some people put Texas service center thinking their case went there and got transfer to California (which is incorrect) and this is why there is a Texas service center showing similar dates on vj timeline  averages.... etc etc... but yeah whichever dates we see they are doing the overall so that's good  

[P&R2017 409]

Time flies really quickly. ... It's almost February... 

maybe because they are working on July files? I don't know...but I have the felling that January was here for a second and it's almost gone...

Before we know it's summer....okey not in Indiana, but anyway...😎

[Kristi&Luigi 157]

33 minutes ago, Naes said:

Just as an info;

in vj people put their notice date instead of the received date. Online updates are based on received dates. So some of those dates are not accurate according to website.

 

also some people put Texas service center thinking their case went there and got transfer to California (which is incorrect) and this is why there is a Texas service center showing similar dates on vj timeline  averages.... etc etc... but yeah whichever dates we see they are doing the overall so that's good  

But how come there is a tsc on uscis.gov timeliness  I never understood this 

Edited January 29, 2018 by Kristi&Luigi

[Naes 12,205]

4 minutes ago, Kristi&Luigi said:

But how come there is a tsc on uscis.gov timeliness  I never understood this 

It sometimes get transfers. But 99.9% of cases goes to california at least it first goes to california. if a case number has "wac" at the start that stand for California (old name western adjudication center if I'm correct)

[------ 281]

Anyone pretty far in to their Affidavit of Support?  (Which I've been doing "NA" for as discussed...meh.)

 

Question 38: "I [DO OR DO NOT] intend to make specific contributions to the support of the [beneficiary]."

 

I don't know, do I?  It lists as examples if I will be providing money or room and board.  Technically, while Tiger is unable to legally work for a few months after his arrival, I will in fact be providing him with a place to stay and covering our expenses.  But that's because he's going to be my husband, duh, not because he's like my boarder or something.  So would I answer that I "do not intend" to do this?  Anybody know how this question gets answered?  

[Naes 12,205]

4 minutes ago, Van & Tiger said:

Anyone pretty far in to their Affidavit of Support?  (Which I've been doing "NA" for as discussed...meh.)

 

Question 38: "I [DO OR DO NOT] intend to make specific contributions to the support of the [beneficiary]."

 

I don't know, do I?  It lists as examples if I will be providing money or room and board.  Technically, while Tiger is unable to legally work for a few months after his arrival, I will in fact be providing him with a place to stay and covering our expenses.  But that's because he's going to be my husband, duh, not because he's like my boarder or something.  So would I answer that I "do not intend" to do this?  Anybody know how this question gets answered?  

Chose do intent, then at the additional info specify the part and write "N/A - Filing for K-1 Visa"

Edited January 29, 2018 by Naes