Leftist corporate media is lying: a daily diary

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

So free speech doesn't apply to the president?  I know, the other presidents handled it differently, but who cares.  Free speech is free speech.

i'm sure you would have defended obama in the same respect, had he ever run off at the mouth publicly bashing a conservative woman's appearance. 

[Boiler 44,858]

 

[Dashinka 24,110]

Just now, JimandChristy said:

Yes free speech is applied to the President as well but his free speech is held to a much higher standard because he holds the most power in this country. Every word the President says matters, it is important, tact is required and Trump has none of it.

And freedom of the press is just an afterthought.  They both should be held to the HIGHEST standards.

[IAMX 3,055]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

And freedom of the press is just an afterthought.  They both should be held to the HIGHEST standards.

Sexism toward women is just holding the Trump administration accountable.. didn't you get the memo? 

[Dashinka 24,110]

1 minute ago, IAMX said:

So.. it's the Presidents fault people in the media are engaging in acts of sexism toward females in the Trump administration. 

 

Double layout with a half-twist.

 

 

[IAMX 3,055]

2 minutes ago, Boiler said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

According to other posters, Clayton must be holding the Trump administration accountable by creating a bogus story that fits the equally bogus narrative. 

Edited June 30, 2017 by IAMX

[smilesammich 10,727]

3 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Glad to hear we don't hold our media to high standards which is what this thread is all about.

 

sure hope you guys get some additional links in with examples. kinda empty. guess that's why we've been going round and round on the okeefe thing. example 2?

[Dashinka 24,110]

Just now, smilesammich said:

sure hope you guys get some additional links in with examples. kinda empty. guess that's why we've been going round and round on the okeefe thing. example 2?

The entire media narrative since November has been fake.  Just about every story from WaPo and the NYTimes with their anonymous sources are highly questionable.  Google is your friend.

[IAMX 3,055]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

The entire media narrative since November has been fake.  Just about every story from WaPo and the NYTimes with their anonymous sources are highly questionable.  Google is your friend.

I need another video to call fake. That's the only way to get proof that it isn't fake. 

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

The entire media narrative since November has been fake.  Just about every story from WaPo and the NYTimes with their anonymous sources are highly questionable.  Google is your friend.

everything is questionable, that is why google is your friend. the difference here is, you won't read anything or consider anything unless it comes from a particular source. i will read anything and attempt to verify/check sources of the info myself. if it's an anonymous source, i assure you, i'm beyond capable of keeping this tidbit in mind. 

[JimandChristy 1,689]

6 minutes ago, IAMX said:

So.. it's the Presidents fault people in the media are engaging in acts of sexism toward females in the Trump administration. 

 

Double layout with a half-twist.

 

It doesn't matter, when said female is enabling the behavior of her boss. The media can say whatever they want, no matter how bad or outrageous it is. They answer to the general public and if they don't do a good job they go out of business. They are not held to the same standard as the president.

[IAMX 3,055]

6 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

It doesn't matter, when said female is enabling the behavior of her boss. The media can say whatever they want, no matter how bad or outrageous it is. They answer to the general public and if they don't do a good job they go out of business. They are not held to the same standard as the president.

Right.. so trust the hypocritical media that criticizes Trump for theoretical misogyny while being misogynistic toward female Trump administration workers.

 

But here's where your argument fails, their criticisms against Trump and this "standard" you tout was for when Trump wasn't President.. so apparently we hold non-Presidents to apparent Presidential standards. 

 

This is a pretty funny argument you're making. 

Edited June 30, 2017 by IAMX

[smilesammich 10,727]

trump wasn't president yesterday? how did i miss that.

[JimandChristy 1,689]

You righties would defend Trump even if he was caught on camera defecating on the oval office desk. 

You'll make excuses, deflect, bring up Presidents who were in office 20 years ago, to defend his actions.

[IAMX 3,055]

1 minute ago, JimandChristy said:

You righties would defend Trump even if he was caught on camera defecating on the oval office desk. 

You'll make excuses, deflect, bring up Presidents who were in office 20 years ago, to defend his actions.

I wasn't aware that the leftist corporate media was Trump. You learn something new every day.

 

Or maybe someone hasn't been paying attention to the name of this thread.

Edited June 30, 2017 by IAMX