Trump's future immigration policies- speculation MEGATHREAD

[Dutchster 1,107]

11 minutes ago, N-o-l-a said:

 

Well, then, he won the majority of the electoral vote because people supported him.  Immigration is a big issue for a lot of people in this country and according to this the majority support this type of ban.  http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/01/29/poll-nearly-half-america-voters-support-trumps-immigration-order

I'm not going to debate the validity of a Quinnipiac poll, which I think should hold, but you might want to start thinking that the majority of Americans might think things that they are too scared to publicly voice because they might get charged by a SJW.

That I do agree. I live very very Southern and I honestly figured I might interfere with some who would tell me to go back to my own country, stop taking America's jobs etc but up until now they have been very supportive. Could be what you mentioned last.

 

[KierenHby 899]

Well, 46% of the voting people supported him. But 300+ electors also supported him. The Constitution won. As it should!!

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

4 hours ago, FloridaMinsk said:

 

I am not going to get into a pissing match over how you are incorrectly using basic terminology.   

 

Trump won because he wanted strong borders.   And he was the only candidate taking a hard stance. 

 

He lost the popular vote because he spent half the money on his campaign that hillary did and never went to California.   She won California by 4 million votes.  Her margin on pop vote was 3.   Which democrats win all the time.... because of California.  

 

If if you are going slam trump then at least be intellectually honest.    

 

I care about my country having laws, a sensible and to our advantage immigration policy.   I want to take in smaller numbers to ensure full assimilation.  

 

The issue isnt family immigration.   It's work and student visas.   University's want international students so they can charge Higher tuition.    It's a boondoggle.  

 

I am not incorrectly using basic terminology.
I do agree though that a pissing contest is not necessary so please follow your advice and discuss instead.
You want smaller numbers and full assimilation, as I said as long as your immigrant makes it in, then slam the door shut and decide who
and from where can immigrate.
International students have changed this country for the better. I care about my country as well and the values it was founded on which are now
ripped away by a Breitbart blogger turned security adviser with absolutely no experience in foreign relations.
Why is a white nationalist suddenly a security adviser, making policy that both McCain and Graham today spoke out against
and said it is dangerous for us and feeds into the narrative of the very enemies we want to eliminate.
Yet, the relevant agencies were left in the dark. This fact alone is insane.

I know more about immigration than this drunken uncle and his side kick will ever know.
Bannon , editor of a blog that is a platform for racism and misogynists. Just look at the headlines he spewed over the past few years.
This guy is not fit to advice anyone. Thank him for the policy we are discussing, not even a policy, just unconstitutional "decrees".
If you think this is your guy then you are misinformed.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/breitbart-headlines_us_5829ba13e4b060adb56f1bdb


 

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

4 hours ago, FloridaMinsk said:

 

If Belarus was added then I will deal with it. I know that I won't be here crying about anything or calling trump a monster.  

 

I wouldn't be worried considering I know she isn't involved in terrorism or anything shady.  

 

Right. I bet. Don't you think that  those who were detained know their family members, spouses/fiances aren't terrorists either ?

[FloridaMinsk 88]

10 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

 

I am not incorrectly using basic terminology.
I do agree though that a pissing contest is not necessary so please follow your advice and discuss instead.
You want smaller numbers and full assimilation, as I said as long as your immigrant makes it in, then slam the door shut and decide who
and from where can immigrate.
International students have changed this country for the better. I care about my country as well and the values it was founded on which are now
ripped away by a Breitbart blogger turned security adviser with absolutely no experience in foreign relations.
Why is a white nationalist suddenly a security adviser, making policy that both McCain and Graham today spoke out against
and said it is dangerous for us and feeds into the narrative of the very enemies we want to eliminate.
Yet, the relevant agencies were left in the dark. This fact alone is insane.

I know more about immigration than this drunken uncle and his side kick will ever know.
Bannon , editor of a blog that is a platform for racism and misogynists. Just look at the headlines he spewed over the past few years.
This guy is not fit to advice anyone. Thank him for the policy we are discussing, not even a policy, just unconstitutional "decrees".
If you think this is your guy then you are misinformed.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/breitbart-headlines_us_5829ba13e4b060adb56f1bdb


 

Mate you posted a huff po link.    What's next a think progress?   Lol

[FloridaMinsk 88]

4 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

 

Right. I bet. Don't you think that  those who were detained know their family members, spouses/fiances aren't terrorists either ?

 

Which is why there should be zero concern on getting anyone's fiancé/wife/husband into the country:   It's not a perma ban.    

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

4 hours ago, FloridaMinsk said:

 

Yes and my point being that those opposing are doing so to avoid being hit with negative leftist attacks.  Since they use the media to hurt companies who don't fall in line.   

 

So do they actually believe it or do they just say so while having a gun to their head? 

Did you really just say that the companies spoke out against the ban because if they do not then they will have repercussions from the media ?
You can't be serious

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

2 hours ago, cyclone27 said:

Pres Trump won because he won the majority of the popular votes in each individual state.  This is the US system it's not a direct national popular vote so it's quite irrelevant and pointless to keep if-ing. 

Lets call them electoral votes. Trump is the biggest iffer of them all, he is tweetishly obsessed with crowd size too.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

9 minutes ago, FloridaMinsk said:

Mate you posted a huff po link.    What's next a think progress?   Lol

So let's see, Huff Post, CNN, NYT, CNN, CBS, NBS.........what's left ? Oh Fox entertainment and Breitbart.
Feel free to go directly to Breitbart's past headlines.

 

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

10 minutes ago, FloridaMinsk said:

 

Which is why there should be zero concern on getting anyone's fiancé/wife/husband into the country:   It's not a perma ban.    

Why have a ban at all then, what is the objective to achieve with a 90 day ban ? Keep the bad guys out for 90 days ? Then let them in ?
What is the point ?
It is a short thank-you note to his voter base so he can say he did what he promised and that is it.
It will not go past the magical 90 days because it is not legal to hold.

[LionessDeon 2,060]

14 minutes ago, FloridaMinsk said:

 

Which is why there should be zero concern on getting anyone's fiancé/wife/husband into the country:   It's not a perma ban.    

Zero concern? Visas were cancelled/suspended. It very well could be extended past the 90 days to whenever. That's definitely going to effect people. And if Belarus was one of those countries it would affect you. You wouldn't have concern? Then dare I say you must not care much about being with your fiancé. One more time...people here are discussing, conversating, sharing thoughts. No one is crying. Not one person has included tears in their post. 

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

Now here we hear a year ago Gov Pence himself, of course he lost his balls somewhere along the line but nevertheless
it is a clear precise statement.
 

 

[FloridaMinsk 88]

1 hour ago, Ebunoluwa said:

Did you really just say that the companies spoke out against the ban because if they do not then they will have repercussions from the media ?
You can't be serious

There have been several attacks by leftists and the media on companies over stances on social issues.    Look at hobby lobby.   Not long ago there was a CEO fired because he donated his private money to a political cause.    

 

Your ignorant if you don't think this happens.   

[FloridaMinsk 88]

46 minutes ago, LionessDeon said:

Zero concern? Visas were cancelled/suspended. It very well could be extended past the 90 days to whenever. That's definitely going to effect people. And if Belarus was one of those countries it would affect you. You wouldn't have concern? Then dare I say you must not care much about being with your fiancé. One more time...people here are discussing, conversating, sharing thoughts. No one is crying. Not one person has included tears in their post. 

 

I would just go to Belarus to be with her until everything was sorted out.   

 

Oh I didn't realize you were crying unless you tagged the emoji haha 

[FloridaMinsk 88]

3 hours ago, N-o-l-a said:

 

Well, then, he won the majority of the electoral vote because people supported him.  Immigration is a big issue for a lot of people in this country and according to this the majority support this type of ban.  http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/01/29/poll-nearly-half-america-voters-support-trumps-immigration-order

I'm not going to debate the validity of a Quinnipiac poll, which I think should hold, but you might want to start thinking that the majority of Americans might think things that they are too scared to publicly voice because they might get charged by a SJW.

 

Exactly.