GOP Rep. Steve Scalise shot at congressional baseball practice in Virginia [merged threads]

[Dashinka 24,889]

2 hours ago, smilesammich said:

if it's white male extremism - call it white male extremism. this is another example of an angry white male, not getting his way, with easy access to guns. fin.

you do understand that the whole "leftists' support of terrorist thing is just a part of the alt right agenda? i'm just sitting here shaking my head, just last night i heard trump going on and on about the democrat obstructionists. all this unifying has to get us on the same page, right?

let people say and do what they want? and you wonder why i asked if you were an anarchist. 

What you said is what is the real problem.  For six years under Obama all we heard about was the GOP obstructionist, and his reasoning for using the EO a little more often than relying on Congress.  So now it is just flipped with those on either side taking the opposite position.  So what we have is a Washington establishment that seems intent on gridlock.  Heartwarming.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Another alt left hate monger whipped into frenzy by all the hate and bile pouring from the left .

[smilesammich 10,727]

15 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

What you said is what is the real problem.  For six years under Obama all we heard about was the GOP obstructionist, and his reasoning for using the EO a little more often than relying on Congress.  So now it is just flipped with those on either side taking the opposite position.  So what we have is a Washington establishment that seems intent on gridlock.  Heartwarming.

i disagree with you for plenty of reasons but primarily because all you're doing is buying into trump's latest shirking of accountability. trump is the one currently calling the democrats obstructionists when in reality, the gop (and trump for sure) aren't bringing anything of value to the table (see secret healthcare bill) but i'm not going to go into all the reasons why because this has nothing to do with the op. democrats/bernie supporters/leftists didn't shoot up the congressional baseball practice, an angry white male who wasn't getting his way did.

 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

4 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i disagree with you for plenty of reasons but primarily because all you're doing is buying into trump's latest shirking of accountability. trump is the one currently calling the democrats obstructionists when in reality, the gop (and trump for sure) aren't bringing anything of value to the table (see secret healthcare bill) but i'm not going to go into all the reasons why because this has nothing to do with the op. democrats/bernie supporters/leftists didn't shoot up the congressional baseball practice, an angry white male who wasn't getting his way did.

 

You just can't bring yourself to idenfy him as left Bernie etc.. Followed immediately by profiling his race 🤣🤣🤣

[-relo- 105]

5 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i disagree with you for plenty of reasons but primarily because all you're doing is buying into trump's latest shirking of accountability. trump is the one currently calling the democrats obstructionists when in reality, the gop (and trump for sure) aren't bringing anything of value to the table (see secret healthcare bill) but i'm not going to go into all the reasons why because this has nothing to do with the op. democrats/bernie supporters/leftists didn't shoot up the congressional baseball practice, an angry white male who wasn't getting his way did.

 

so, islamic extremist haven't been behind the recent terrorists attacks in europe. it was angry muslims not getting their way. right?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Shooter Declared Love For Rachel Maddow’s Show In Letters To Editor

Read more: http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/shooter-declared-love-rachel-maddows-show-letters-editor/#ixzz4k0slQOh0 
Follow us: @TheLibRepublic on Twitter

[smilesammich 10,727]

15 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

You just can't bring yourself to idenfy him as left Bernie etc.. Followed immediately by profiling his race 🤣🤣🤣

i'm not profiling the white race. i'm not saying all white males are terrorists at their core. i have no problem identifying the the shooter as a bernie supporter, same way if the shoot had been muslim i'd have no issue saying so. i don't think that being a bernie supporter or progressive makes you violent, nor do i think that being muslim makes you violent or being white makes you violent. but when we're trying to find solutions to terrorism, work place shootings etc..it helps not to ignore particular events just because they don't fit your narrative of who you believe primarily carries these acts of violence out..

8 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Shooter Declared Love For Rachel Maddow’s Show In Letters To Editor

Read more: http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/shooter-declared-love-rachel-maddows-show-letters-editor/#ixzz4k0slQOh0 
Follow us: @TheLibRepublic on Twitter

that's funny, i mean how can you hate hillary and tolerate rachel maddow?

[smilesammich 10,727]

23 minutes ago, -relo- said:

so, islamic extremist haven't been behind the recent terrorists attacks in europe. it was angry muslims not getting their way. right?

first..i don't live in europe. america is not europe. and yeah, i guess you could call the perps in those attacks angry muslims or islamic extremists if it makes you feel better. what difference does it make?

if europe had these same attacks but perpetrated by angry white dudes driving trucks into crowds or blowing up kids at a concert - do you think they would ignore those acts as terror simply because they hadn't been carried out by a muslim? or would they say, gee we've got a problem here - what's the pattern..?

Edited June 14, 2017 by smilesammich

[Dashinka 24,889]

58 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i disagree with you for plenty of reasons but primarily because all you're doing is buying into trump's latest shirking of accountability. trump is the one currently calling the democrats obstructionists when in reality, the gop (and trump for sure) aren't bringing anything of value to the table (see secret healthcare bill) but i'm not going to go into all the reasons why because this has nothing to do with the op. democrats/bernie supporters/leftists didn't shoot up the congressional baseball practice, an angry white male who wasn't getting his way did.

 

You need to go back and review the last six years and see what value the Dems brought to the table.  It is obvious that partisanship is ripe on both sides and the people on the other side will always blame the other side for whatever they feel is lack of progress.

[Dashinka 24,889]

36 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i'm not profiling the white race. i'm not saying all white males are terrorists at their core. i have no problem identifying the the shooter as a bernie supporter, same way if the shoot had been muslim i'd have no issue saying so. i don't think that being a bernie supporter or progressive makes you violent, nor do i think that being muslim makes you violent or being white makes you violent. but when we're trying to find solutions to terrorism, work place shootings etc..it helps not to ignore particular events just because they don't fit your narrative of who you believe primarily carries these acts of violence out..

that's funny, i mean how can you hate hillary and tolerate rachel maddow?

I seem to remember all the talking heads saying that Sarah Palin was to blame for whipping up a fury against Democrats and putting targets on their backs when Giffords and many others were shot.  It seems we have the same thing occurring now with all the negative news about Trump and by extension the GOP.  Personally I didn't think Palin was to blame then, and I don't think Sanders is to blame now, but it wouldn't be a bad thing to have all the narratives ratcheted down a bit and let the government run its course.

[smilesammich 10,727]

5 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

You need to go back and review the last six years and see what value the Dems brought to the table.  It is obvious that partisanship is ripe on both sides and the people on the other side will always blame the other side for whatever they feel is lack of progress.

no, actually i don't. ive been paying attention. there's no point to government, i catch your drift.

[-relo- 105]

47 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

first..i don't live in europe. america is not europe. and yeah, i guess you could call the perps in those attacks angry muslims or islamic extremists if it makes you feel better. what difference does it make?

if europe had these same attacks but perpetrated by angry white dudes driving trucks into crowds or blowing up kids at a concert - do you think they would ignore those acts as terror simply because they hadn't been carried out by a muslim? or would they say, gee we've got a problem here - what's the pattern..?

the pattern is: some people suck at truth & reasoning

Edited June 14, 2017 by -relo-

[smilesammich 10,727]

7 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I seem to remember all the talking heads saying that Sarah Palin was to blame for whipping up a fury against Democrats and putting targets on their backs when Giffords and many others were shot.  It seems we have the same thing occurring now with all the negative news about Trump and by extension the GOP.  Personally I didn't think Palin was to blame then, and I don't think Sanders is to blame now, but it wouldn't be a bad thing to have all the narratives ratcheted down a bit and let the government run its course.

well..theres why you and i can't see eye to eye. government should never be allowed to 'run it's course'. that's weird to me

[Dashinka 24,889]

Just now, smilesammich said:

well..theres why you and i can't see eye to eye. government should never be allowed to 'run it's course'. that's weird to me

I get it gridlock is good, and one side doing everything they can to obstruct the other side is the American way.

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, -relo- said:

the pattern is: you suck at truth & reasoning

damn why'd ya go and use that awesome burn on lil ol me?