Trump travel ban suffers new court defeat

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

Yes thank god for the supreme court. speaking of cognitive gaps.. The MDL and the 9th circuit. A give that never stops giving 

did you really book mark this and come back on the hour the Scotus weighed in on the topic?  I am touched. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Just now, ccneat said:

did you really book mark this and come back on the hour the Scotus weighed in on the topic?  I am touched. 

No I had it pre written, because Helen Keller could have seen what was going to happen 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

No I had it pre written, because Helen Keller could have seen what was going to happen 

Not really, who could have foreseen that a 5 4 court could have stricken down the provision for anyone with a prior "bona fide relationship with any person or entity in the United States"  like a relative, a boss, a business.  We will have to wait until this time next year to see what the final ruling is, the court will not even hear arguments till October. 

 

AND At this point isn't the travel ban moot?   Trump asked for 90 days temporary ban and we are at 6 months.  I am sure he has is all figured out by now. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Just now, ccneat said:

Not really, who could have foreseen that a 5 4 court could have stricken down the provision for anyone with a prior "bona fide relationship with any person or entity in the United States"  like a relative, a boss, a business.  We will have to wait until this time next year to see what the final ruling is, the court will not even hear arguments till October. 

 

AND At this point isn't the travel ban moot?   Trump asked for 90 days temporary ban and we are at 6 months.  I am sure he has is all figured out by now. 

The spin is Turning  into gale force winds 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

The spin is Turning  into gale force winds 

I am just asking some questions...no answers yet.   

[IAMX 3,055]

37 minutes ago, ccneat said:

Not really, who could have foreseen that a 5 4 court could have stricken down the provision for anyone with a prior "bona fide relationship with any person or entity in the United States"  like a relative, a boss, a business.  We will have to wait until this time next year to see what the final ruling is, the court will not even hear arguments till October. 

 

AND At this point isn't the travel ban moot?   Trump asked for 90 days temporary ban and we are at 6 months.  I am sure he has is all figured out by now. 

Nope, wrong. Was 9-0, not 5-4. And the court allowed a review by the federal government (that was to take place anyways) to decide for itself whether it should extend that ban..

 

Gold medal for the mental gymnastics. 

Edited June 26, 2017 by IAMX

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

54 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

He needs to keep concentrating on the high speed rail and make sure it can actually get out of Fresno before he talks anymore. 

[CaliCat 3,957]

19 hours ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

The spin is Turning  into gale force winds 

 

1 hour ago, Ban Hammer said:

 

Gale forces? More like a tempest, in a teapot. LOL

[OriZ 3,157]

11 hours ago, Ban Hammer said:

Hey here's more typical stuff! this is a particularly fun night!