I-129f June 2017 filers (merged)

[Kween 167]

Right 

[AZSunshine78 437]

9 hours ago, DandY said:

Would be true if USCIS worked them in order!

Who are they?! They June filers who are progressing.. Litmus test*..  would like to follow them as well, as we are June 5 filers! Patiently waiting and crossing our fingers just like everyone❤️

Edited September 15, 2017 by AZSunshine78
Correction

[Catseal 268]

35 minutes ago, AZSunshine78 said:

Who are they?! They June filers who are progressing.. Litmus test*..  would like to follow them as well, as we are June 5 filers! Patiently waiting and crossing our fingers just like everyone❤️

That would be us. But we are not progressing at all, just waiting like all in this thread.
Additionally (and unfortunately), it doesn't even look like they work the petitions in order.

Aren't there still people even as far back as December waiting for their NOA2?
 

[John & Rose 7,239]

2 minutes ago, Catseal said:

 

Aren't there still people even as far back as December waiting for their NOA2?
 

I think RFEs are the reason for that. There are March filers waiting and April filers with their NOA2s. 

[Catseal 268]

On another note - this goes out to beneficiaries with middle names - has anyone had the issue that only the first name was printed on the NOA1?

Edited September 15, 2017 by Catseal

[Hadassah123 523]

15 hours ago, Catseal said:

On another note - this goes out to beneficiaries with middle names - has anyone had the issue that only the first name was printed on the NOA1?

Don't think it's an issue, but same here. They only printed my first and last name on our NOA1. I have 1 middle name.

[Catseal 268]

 

1 minute ago, Hadassah123 said:

Don't think it's an issue, but same here. They only printed my first and last name on our NOA1. I have 1 middle name.

Ok, same here. That seems to be how it should be then, I hope.

[daleguthery 305]

On 9/15/2017 at 2:33 PM, John & Rose said:

I realize that the algorithm is based on a relatively small sample but looking at March and April, it seems like 50% are going past the timeline anticipated date.  I assume that trend will continue.  I do not take the estimate as reality.  I realize it is based upon historical data that really has no resemblance to what we are heading into now.  It reminds me of when I had my kids.  They gave estimated dates but they meant very little.  They were born when they were born and the estimates did not equate to reality.  It will happen when it happens.  I guess having the estimate does give some reassurance that things are moving, albeit very slowly!

You also have to figure that some of the registered users on here don't follow through with updating their timelines in a timely fashion, or even update them at all, and that would throw off the algorithm.

[John & Rose 7,239]

1 minute ago, daleguthery said:

You also have to figure that some of the registered users on here don't follow through with updating their timelines in a timely fashion, or even update them at all, and that would throw off the algorithm.

Indeed. That is a very good observation that I hadn't considered. It does depend on us updating our timelines. 

[Kween 167]

There is a visa journey facebook group and i asked the people that have a profile on here how accurate was the timeline for the noa2,and most of them said it was the exact same day. A few said 4 days off and 2 people said 1-3 weeks off

[DandY 134]

3 hours ago, Kween said:

There is a visa journey facebook group and i asked the people that have a profile on here how accurate was the timeline for the noa2,and most of them said it was the exact same day. A few said 4 days off and 2 people said 1-3 weeks off

I think I have had 17 noa2 date predictions here. Maybe one of them is close! But seriously, if it keeps changing right up to the time you get it, not very impressive. Ours have not settled into a date, so I don't think any date can be seen as "the date". I'm still thinking the dates here are 1 week too optimistic for us (but boy do I hope I'm wrong!) John's even more pessimistic than me, he think they are 4 weeks too optimistic!

[Kween 167]

That makes alot of sence

[Murph4865 597]

1 hour ago, Ilovemyfamily17 said:

Hi everyone...104 days today , I am so anxious I just met once and I know that everything is true  but I am afraid! any advice?

Please fill out time line it helps others and the site to be more accurate

[LabOz 915]

3 hours ago, Ilovemyfamily17 said:

Hi everyone...104 days today , I am so anxious I just met once and I know that everything is true  but I am afraid! any advice?

http://www.visajourney.com/timeline/

Here is the timeline he is referring to

Just fill it out.

 

As to your question you have met the requirement of meeting ONCE in the last 2 years.

There is no requirement to meet more than 1 time. The USCIS will not reject your case for that.

Now the US Embassy in Brazil they would like to see more proof of an actual relationship so if possible try to visit again in the next 2-4 months prior to  

her interview. Next Don't be afraid all will be fine. Rate of denial of I-129F is extremely low.

[Tim & Tiff 8]

Just hoping to move by end January 2018.

 

Do you think this is realistic?