I-129f June 2017 filers (merged)

[Joyax30 26]

2 hours ago, Swissmiss82 said:

how do you know 3 are expedite?  and the rest isn't?

Opppsss I just stalk in the uscis website. Hehehe 😄

[Joyax30 26]

2 hours ago, Catseal said:

Sure you all monitor the May thread too, but I wrote it wrongfully there, so here goes again: 

 

Fairly sure all those approved June cases are expedited. Is it actually possible to see them marked as expedite @Joyax30?

 

Also, as mentioned already in the May Thread a few days ago, it would be interesting how many April petitions they have done at which point / are still doing right now, to actually see if they are mostly only working May petitions at this point, and if not not, how many from April are left in need of processing before they get to May only and eventually us June filers.

I hope they start early June soon  Good luck to everyone!

Yes, You can read in their case history if expedite or not. I actually log in the uscis website and enter the case #. 😉 Anyways, keep the positivity. We will get our noa2 soon. 😊

[Karl miles 21]

Has anybody else had an apostille stamp put on their fiance's documents? I would like to know if this is really necessary or not?

[Kween 167]

6 hours ago, Naes said:

The link for the raw data of June!

 

You will realize the total number of cases got a little less with this one, cause I caught some may filed but status changed in June cases  -mostly rejected cases in between. So here is the final total.

 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-q5XFcF4yMedjVmWEt2U012RFk

 

This is my first try with google drive, please let me know if it doesn't work

 

Found it im in the 3,300's

[Larissa & Johnson 40]

I would like to know what happens if someone with bad intentions knows my case number? 

 

 

[John & Rose 7,239]

3 minutes ago, loveneverfails17 said:

I would like to know what happens if someone with bad intentions knows my case number? 

I do not believe they can do anything to alter it but that is an interesting question.  I wonder if they can try to withdraw it without proof of who they are.  I cant believe it would be that easy but it is worth asking about.

[Larissa & Johnson 40]

Just now, John & Rose said:

I do not believe they can do anything to alter it but that is an interesting question.  I wonder if they can try to withdraw it without proof of who they are.  I cant believe it would be that easy but it is worth asking about.

Thank you 

😇

[John & Rose 7,239]

1 minute ago, loveneverfails17 said:

Thank you 

😇

You are welcome.  That brings up such an interesting question.  I originally didn't see any reason not to have my WAC# out there but if anyone can use that to change the petition it is a little scary.  My gut says that it isn't that easy but I wonder what proof they need to make changes.

[DandY 134]

3 hours ago, George & John said:

<snip> I don't know how USCIS processes their cases, and I imagine someone has already addressed this issue in more detail and with more accuracy, but that's what I've assumed (thus far) is responsible for the ostensibly haphazard approval order. Is anybody in possession of more info?

 

Also, it was pretty easy on our system to accidentally review a case received much more recently - for example, if the received date had been inputted or formatted incorrectly, or just by handler or system error. Whilst some/most of these approved June cases were probably expedited, if we're talking about >4000 numbers, it would be quite possible that a tiny minority of recent applications were reviewed by mistake (or began to be reviewed before the staff member realised their error - but at that point, continued anyway for expediency).

 

Anyway, drawing from my limited experience, that's how I've been making sense of it so far. This theory works even if there is a high element of automation in their processing (which, looking at their numbers, there surely must be!). Any other explanations been floating about?

All we have are descriptions of the process from former adjudicators, but it is describes as you surmise. I work in a field where we automated paper driven processes like this one primarily for financial institutions and government agencies, and your description accurately describes the common pattern heavily manual paper-driven processes. This would also explain much of the date variation in processing, since there really is no FIFO queue.

 

While this pattern of processing within a single processing center (WAC) describes why we see out of sequence processing within a 2 or 3 week window, it does not explain why we see out of sequence in a much larger window (like 6-8 weeks that see see sometimes). This remains a complete mystery to me and I have no hypothesis as to why this occurs.

[George & John 52]

43 minutes ago, DandY said:

All we have are descriptions of the process from former adjudicators, but it is describes as you surmise. I work in a field where we automated paper driven processes like this one primarily for financial institutions and government agencies, and your description accurately describes the common pattern heavily manual paper-driven processes. This would also explain much of the date variation in processing, since there really is no FIFO queue.

 

While this pattern of processing within a single processing center (WAC) describes why we see out of sequence processing within a 2 or 3 week window, it does not explain why we see out of sequence in a much larger window (like 6-8 weeks that see see sometimes). This remains a complete mystery to me and I have no hypothesis as to why this occurs.

Makes sense. Erroneous processing of more recent applications would account for the odd anomaly, but certainly not a consistent pattern. There is the possibility of manager or specialist referral for cases of unusual complexity and/or concern. Another consideration is some applicants having contacts within USCIS who facilitate advantageous treatment. However depressing that may sound, it pales in comparison to the UK visa system, in which you can buy your way to a spousal visa within days!

[daleguthery 305]

3 hours ago, Kween said:

Found it im in the 3,300's

I'm in the end of the 600's

[Allthephils 536]

Day 135..............................................

[Kween 167]

20 minutes ago, daleguthery said:

I'm in the end of the 600's

Omg

[Soya & Dama 30]

I just want to know if some of you started to receive noa2 from June filers or not yet?

[John & Rose 7,239]

6 minutes ago, Damaris Martis said:

I just want to know if some of you started to receive noa2 from June filers or not yet?

Only expedited petitions. We still have a month or two to go before we will see any real NOA2 numbers.