Duterte puts Chelsa in her place

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

Then don't wade into the mess without expecting to be called out as being a hypocrite.

she is not a rapist. that's the only way her comments are hypocritical. 

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

Yes, Chelsea is just a victim.  I get it.  I also agree, she certainly isn't worth acknowledging by a world leader.

who said anything about victim? just you, i believe. 

[CaliCat 3,957]

2 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

who said anything about victim? just you, i believe. 

 

She's a victim of this thread. 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, CaliCat said:

 

She's a victim of this thread. 

i'm thinking the reason nb didn't post the actual article is because duerte's response is not at all family friendly. but yeah let's defend the guy who's willing to take one for the team if any of his soldiers get giggity with unwilling suspects. he sure did put that ugly hillary spawn in her place, no misogyny here - MAGA!

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

5 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

She's a victim of this thread. 

arent we all?

[CaliCat 3,957]

14 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i'm thinking the reason nb didn't post the actual article is because duerte's response is not at all family friendly. but yeah let's defend the guy who's willing to take one for the team if any of his soldiers get giggity with unwilling suspects. he sure did put that ugly hillary spawn in her place, no misogyny here - MAGA!

 

Yes, the dictator used language he's used to, to justify his comment on troops raping women.  Fortunately, we have one poster here who recommended him as a great dictator, so all is well. He's a good guy!

 

The article is quoted below:

 

 

'What was your reaction when your father was (fill in the blanks) Monica Lewinsky?' Philippines president Duterte hits back at Chelsea Clinton after she criticised his 'joke' about troops raping women

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4558362/Philippines-president-Duterte-hits-Chelsea-Clinton.html#ixzz4ilwjG1nD 
 

Edited June 1, 2017 by CaliCat

[IAMX 3,055]

22 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Then don't wade into the mess without expecting to be called out as being a hypocrite.

I agree, soon as she opened her mouth, she then is open to attack. Doesn't matter if she's the daughter of Hillary Clinton. If Ivanka Trump opened her mouth about Duterte, it would be the same thing. 

 

But lets face it, the criticism of Ivanka from the left is nothing similar to this. Ivanka, along with Barron Trump and Trumps other children, have been attacked by the left for doing nothing other than existing and having the last name of Trump. Ivanka, most of all, is by far the biggest leftist of the Trump family. That's how badly the left are triggered by anything-Trump.

 

This is the left's attempt of false equivalence to try and make equal the attacks on Chelsea vs. Ivanka.

Edited June 1, 2017 by IAMX

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

I think Chelsea is an adult now, and presumably educated, so I am sure she has more knowledge of the allegations of her father now.  I could care less about Duterte, but if I were her, it would not be a topic I would want to wade into.

Exactly 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

21 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i'm thinking the reason nb didn't post the actual article is because duerte's response is not at all family friendly. but yeah let's defend the guy who's willing to take one for the team if any of his soldiers get giggity with unwilling suspects. he sure did put that ugly hillary spawn in her place, no misogyny here - MAGA!

Bingo on why I did not post. You got to be veteran like us to know the ropes 🤣

[Dashinka 24,514]

20 minutes ago, IAMX said:

I agree, soon as she opened her mouth, she then is open to attack. Doesn't matter if she's the daughter of Hillary Clinton. If Ivanka Trump opened her mouth about Duterte, it would be the same thing. 

 

But lets face it, the criticism of Ivanka from the left is nothing similar to this. Ivanka, along with Barron Trump and Trumps other children, have been attacked by the left for doing nothing other than existing and having the last name of Trump. Ivanka, most of all, is by far the biggest leftist of the Trump family. That's how badly the left are triggered by anything-Trump.

 

This is the left's attempt of false equivalence to try and make equal the attacks on Chelsea vs. Ivanka.

Wait, I have heard that logic before.  Let me think, yes, the vile Sean Hannity and the criticism he received over the whole Seth Rich accusations.   Chelsea is a public figure, and when she makes public statements that appear hypocritical, she has to expect some criticism.  I will agree that Duterte really shouldn't have acknowledged her though.

[yuna628 9,676]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

I think Chelsea is an adult now, and presumably educated, so I am sure she has more knowledge of the allegations of her father now.  I could care less about Duterte, but if I were her, it would not be a topic I would want to wade into.

She is an adult with the right to free speech. If a pseudo dictator is annoyed about that fact, that's not her problem. As for more knowledge of the allegations, that's just it - they were allegations and not proven. By that logic everyone that has allegations against them (including Trump himself) are guilty of every single thing they are accused of, is that correct?

[smilesammich 10,727]

39 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

Yes, the dictator used language he's used to, to justify his comment on troops raping women.  Fortunately, we have one poster here who recommended him as a great dictator, so all is well. He's a good guy!

 

The article is quoted below:

 

 

'What was your reaction when your father was (fill in the blanks) Monica Lewinsky?' Philippines president Duterte hits back at Chelsea Clinton after she criticised his 'joke' about troops raping women

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4558362/Philippines-president-Duterte-hits-Chelsea-Clinton.html#ixzz4ilwjG1nD 
 

yup. this is where the knowing the difference between consensual sex and rape comes in handy, but i guess it makes no difference if it's all about shutting up an uppity female..

[IAMX 3,055]

22 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Wait, I have heard that logic before.  Let me think, yes, the vile Sean Hannity and the criticism he received over the whole Seth Rich accusations.   Chelsea is a public figure, and when she makes public statements that appear hypocritical, she has to expect some criticism.  I will agree that Duterte really shouldn't have acknowledged her though.

Well I mean, he is perpetuating a conspiracy theory.. 

 

The left attack Hannity regardless, he attacks them.. I don't think there's any innocent people there. However, Chelsea is far from innocent when she enters the foray to make incendiary comments toward a foreign leader. So there's nothing inappropriate whatsoever about Duterte responding in kind. Ivanka, on the other hand, has done nothing like this whatsoever, so it's funny watching the left justify attacking her.

[Ban Hammer 13,349]

2 hours ago, smilesammich said:

typical mansplaination too, zero logic or reason, hint o misogyny and total lack of awareness.

that sounds sexist.

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

that sounds sexist.

shall i provide you a safe space?