Jump to content

70 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
5 minutes ago, sy1983 said:

 

This is why I never said to apply for a visitors visa. She is a national under VWP. She is able to stay for 90 days and leave the country and re enter the United States again.  If this is such a terrible idea, why is it that NO ONE can answer me. What is the appropriate amount of time that she is allow to re-enter the US again ? 

I think the US has way more problems right now then to care if a law binding visitor makes a visit ONE time a little too close than her previous entry.  

Ive also have friends from Taiwan and S. Korea that have there parents visit a few times a year. 

Do you really think helping out a family member at home is really consider work? 

It isn't child labor if a child works at a home owned establishment. Kinda the same thing .... 

no worries guys. I'm done .. you guys come up with whatever you want.  

I say multiple entry in a year is no big deal. If you are a law binding person under VWP. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personal experience from someone from canada: they want more time in your country than the USA, yes people get turned away for saying they'll look after family.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
20 minutes ago, sy1983 said:

 

This is why I never said to apply for a visitors visa. She is a national under VWP. She is able to stay for 90 days and leave the country and re enter the United States again.  If this is such a terrible idea, why is it that NO ONE can answer me. What is the appropriate amount of time that she is allow to re-enter the US again ? 

I think the US has way more problems right now then to care if a law binding visitor makes a visit ONE time a little too close than her previous entry.  

Ive also have friends from Taiwan and S. Korea that have there parents visit a few times a year. 

Do you really think helping out a family member at home is really consider work? 

It isn't child labor if a child works at a home owned establishment. Kinda the same thing .... 

no worries guys. I'm done .. you guys come up with whatever you want.  

I say multiple entry in a year is no big deal. If you are a law binding person under VWP. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no set appropriate amount of time that she is allowed to reenter the US again.  It's a case-by-case basis.

 

How do you know she is a law abiding visitor?  How do you know anyone is a law abiding visitor?

 

It doesn't matter what you think or what we think.  It's about what the US Government thinks.  You don't seem to understand that your opinion and ours does not matter and only the opinion of the US Government as to whether it's work or not matters.  You think your opinion about what is consider work or not should matter when the US Embassy interviews people for visitor visas.

 

 

Posted
57 minutes ago, geowrian said:

Do I? Maybe. But what I think or you think doesn't matter. What matters is if USCIS thinks it's considered work. They have made that determination many times in the past.

 

No, these are not at all the same thing. You're confusing criminal law, tax code, and labor regulations with immigration law. These are legally very different circumstances.

Exactly! 

I even posted a news article in this thread where a person was denied entry because the border officer decided taking care of a child is considered work. It didn't matter what the visiting foreigner thought. It didn't matter what her relatives in the US thought. It didn't matter what we or @sy1983 thought. It only mattered what the border agent thought at the time and she was sent back home.  

Don't know why this poster is saying we can "keep making things up" when there is proof.

“When starting an immigration journey, the best advice is to understand that sacrifices have to be made... whether it is time, money, or separation; or a combination of all.” - Unlockable

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, sy1983 said:

 

This is why I never said to apply for a visitors visa. She is a national under VWP. She is able to stay for 90 days and leave the country and re enter the United States again.  If this is such a terrible idea, why is it that NO ONE can answer me. What is the appropriate amount of time that she is allow to re-enter the US again ? 

I think the US has way more problems right now then to care if a law binding visitor makes a visit ONE time a little too close than her previous entry.  

Ive also have friends from Taiwan and S. Korea that have there parents visit a few times a year. 

Do you really think helping out a family member at home is really consider work? 

It isn't child labor if a child works at a home owned establishment. Kinda the same thing .... 

no worries guys. I'm done .. you guys come up with whatever you want.  

I say multiple entry in a year is no big deal. If you are a law binding person under VWP. 

I did do a 80 odd day VWP once, back to back, well you are asking for trouble, have some people managed it, absolutely. A friend of mine effectively lived in the US for 10 years on a B, as they say do you feel lucky.

 

I also made multiple entries in one year but all for a normal tourism periods.

 

I worked for a multinational and remember a note coming around about US business trips and not to overdo it.

 

Looking after children is hard work, not sure why you think otherwise.

Edited by Boiler

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
2 hours ago, sy1983 said:

 

This is why I never said to apply for a visitors visa. She is a national under VWP. She is able to stay for 90 days and leave the country and re enter the United States again.  If this is such a terrible idea, why is it that NO ONE can answer me. What is the appropriate amount of time that she is allow to re-enter the US again ?  People have answered you multiple times but you fail to read their posts apparently.

 

I think the US has way more problems right now then to care if a law binding visitor makes a visit ONE time a little too close than her previous entry. Who says she is a law abiding citizen? By the way...we don't care what you "think" and neither does the US Government.

 

Ive also have friends from Taiwan and S. Korea that have there parents visit a few times a year. The key word is VISIT!  Most humans can't afford to take two six month "vacations" a year!  It's pretty obvious when someone wants to come to the USA for a 6 month "vacation" then leave and come back in a few weeks for yet another 6 month "vacation".

 

Do you really think helping out a family member at home is really consider work? Yes, absolutely!  Child care is big business in the US.  Many UNITED STATES CITIZENS (AMERICANS) rely on this for their income by doing in-home day care.  Many of these child care providers and licensed and even pay social security and taxes on their income which of course a non-us citizen could not possibly pay because they are not allowed to work.   In Hawaii the cost of child care is 600 to 1100 dollars per month per child for a full-time babysitter.  A foreigner coming into the country takes that child or children out of the day care system, thus denying an AMERICAN income.

 

It isn't child labor if a child works at a home owned establishment. Kinda the same thing .... No, totally different.  You are talking about child labor laws now.

 

no worries guys. I'm done .. you guys come up with whatever you want.  Thank GOD for that because you refuse to see the truth.

 

I say multiple entry in a year is no big deal. If you are a law binding person under VWP.  Again, no one cares what you think.  And that's that!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

I did not get a PM, feel a bit left out :(

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
5 minutes ago, Regina89 said:

Waoh! This is going way too far. 

Thank you all for your time and advices. It was very helpful for me. 

I do understand that it doesn't matter what I think or what we think.  It's about what the US Government thinks and what their opinion will be since in fact, other than helping my sister, I don't have any other reason to stay that long in the US. If doing so is considered work by the US Embassy then.... 

 

Please don't insult each other because of this topic. I came here because I needed feedback from your experiences and I'm glad you answered me. 

I agree.  There is no need for you to apologize about this.  You asked a question and I hope you got the answers you needed.  I got a lot more than I bargained for.  Good luck to you all.  God Bless 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

An inappropriate post has been removed.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted

OP's sister is in a far better situation than a typical mom-to-be with an absent spouse no matter the reason for his absence. As long as Sis plans ahead and makes contact with the individuals I listed before, she should do fine.  In the event she needs assistance with immigration services, there will be people at her husband's unit to guide her to the proper resource.  The USCIS has special services for the military and their family members. OP should be a normal tourist and enjoy her visit with family; everything else will work out for Sis.

 

Country: France
Timeline
Posted
57 minutes ago, CEE53147 said:

OP's sister is in a far better situation than a typical mom-to-be with an absent spouse no matter the reason for his absence. As long as Sis plans ahead and makes contact with the individuals I listed before, she should do fine.  In the event she needs assistance with immigration services, there will be people at her husband's unit to guide her to the proper resource.  The USCIS has special services for the military and their family members. OP should be a normal tourist and enjoy her visit with family; everything else will work out for Sis.

 

What does OP mean? 

 

Who are the individuals you're talking about? 

 

I think if there were any other suitable solution that the military can provide, she wouldn't ask me to come since I'm making a huge sacrifice putting my life "on stop" in order to help her. 

 

Maybe there are things she doesn't know. Can you explain please? 

Country: France
Timeline
Posted
On 31/05/2017 at 2:21 AM, Mollie09 said:

Not a choice of words, the difference is between a mother visiting a daughter and work that could be done by a hired nanny.

The problem is that I don't think she can afford a nanny.

If I don't get there, she'll just have a really hard time and a lot in mind to figure out how to handle things.

Imagine there's a problem at night and she might go to the hospital, she'll have to wake her children up, put them in the car and drive herself.

Who wouldn't want to help her sister in such situation if they can ? 

She's all alone there with no family. We all live in France and she's the  only one who decided to live in the US. 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

Can she stay with you and have her family to hand?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...