US declines to endorse Paris Climate agreement [merged threads]

[IAMX 3,055]

2 hours ago, OriZ said:

Yes because none of them have any kids, grandkids, grand grandkids or anything like that.

Those middle aged people that poster is attacking I'm sure are thankful they won't be around to hear the next vogue term for global warming trying to market and align social justice with science (and modify science to fit the narrative).

Edited June 1, 2017 by IAMX

[Jacque67 7,328]

So China and Russia have agreed to sign, and Donnie is gonna make the big announcement in the Rose Garden!!!

 

unfortunately at 7 am he was still obsessing about unmasking!! Get a grip! 

[Teddy B 17,251]

3 minutes ago, Jacque67 said:

So China and Russia have agreed to sign, and Donnie is gonna make the big announcement in the Rose Garden!!!

 

unfortunately at 7 am he was still obsessing about unmasking!! Get a grip! 

Donnie says to all of the countries that have signed the agreement: "I beg your pardon, I never promised you a rose garden"

 

 

[Bugs 455]

3 hours ago, OriZ said:

Yes because none of them have any kids, grandkids, grand grandkids or anything like that.

 

Don't you think it would be irresponsible parenting to pursue something that may pose a great risk to your kids because the science isn't clear to you on it? It would be like continuing to feed a kid something you know he may be allergic to because it's not 100% certain that his previous allergic reaction was specifically attributed to that specific food, even though initial signs pointed to that.  Sure, further research may be warranted in your mind, but it would still be more responsible to abstain from that food until you are 100% certain of its cause.

 

I would think anyways.

[Bugs 455]

2 hours ago, IAMX said:

Those middle aged people that poster is attacking I'm sure are thankful they won't be around to hear the next vogue term for global warming trying to market and align social justice with science (and modify science to fit the narrative).

 

So what science was modified specifically?

 

Is CO2 actually not a greenhouse gas?

Or is the statistical data that shows we artificially pump 29 gigatons of it into the air each year incorrect?  

Or is the simple arithmetic that shows it brings the net CO2 production/absorption on Earth to a surplus somehow erroneous?

Or were the charts that show a direct correspondence of this net CO2 increase the Industrial Age altered?

Or were the cyclic patterns that show the Earth was set to cycle to a cooling age before this spike altered?

 

Which of these things did 97% of all the climate scientists across all nations in the world suddenly decide to completely trash the scientific method that they each were heavily trained to always abide by and collude upon?

 

 

 

Edited June 1, 2017 by Leon & Mylen

[Teddy B 17,251]

27 minutes ago, Leon & Mylen said:

 

Don't you think it would be irresponsible parenting to pursue something that may pose a great risk to your kids because the science isn't clear to you on it? It would be like continuing to feed a kid something you know he may be allergic to because it's not 100% certain that his previous allergic reaction was specifically attributed to that specific food, even though initial signs pointed to that.  Sure, further research may be warranted in your mind, but it would still be more responsible to abstain from that food until you are 100% certain of its cause.

 

I would think anyways.

I'm still holding out hope that lead paint and asbestos will make a comeback. Buy low and sell high!!

[CaliCat 3,957]

17 minutes ago, Leon & Mylen said:

 

So what science was modified specifically?

 

Is CO2 actually not a greenhouse gas?

Or is the statistical data that shows we artificially pump 29 gigatons of it into the air each year incorrect?  

Or is the simple arithmetic that shows it brings the net CO2 production/absorption on Earth to a surplus somehow erroneous?

Or were the charts that show a direct correspondence of this net CO2 increase the Industrial Age altered?

Or were the cyclic patterns that show the Earth was set to cycle to a cooling age before this spike altered?

 

Which of these things did 97% of all the climate scientists across all nations in the world suddenly decide to completely trash the scientific method that they each were heavily trained to always abide by and collude upon?

 

 

 

 

Seriously? Who are you going to trust? Scientists or some stranger in the internet who actually knows what's going on ?

[CaliCat 3,957]

1 minute ago, Teddy B said:

I'm still holding out hope that lead paint and asbestos will make a comeback. Buy low and sell high!!

 

 

Asbestos will be the base for Ivan-kah's next line of clothing. It'll be named Trumpcare Wear. It will resolve the issue with poor sick people in America.

[Teddy B 17,251]

5 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

Seriously? Who are you going to trust? Scientists or some stranger in the internet who actually knows what's going on ?

Strangers on the intranets know stuff.

[CaliCat 3,957]

1 minute ago, Teddy B said:

Strangers on the intranets know stuff.

 

In this site, in particular, and especially about simple matters as planetary weather. And all these years NASA has been spending money sending probes across the solar system, when all the answers they need can be found right here!

[Jacque67 7,328]

Plus 100 to the above posts!!!

[CaliCat 3,957]

2 hours ago, Jacque67 said:

So China and Russia have agreed to sign, and Donnie is gonna make the big announcement in the Rose Garden!!!

 

unfortunately at 7 am he was still obsessing about unmasking!! Get a grip! 

 

If Putin stays in, chances are he will instruct our so-called president not to rock that boat. We'll find out when Trump makes his announcement. 

[JimandChristy 1,689]

If Trump doesn't honor the Paris agreement it'll go to show once again how out of touch Republicans are with the rest of the world. It's all about money and making profit, screw the climate, let's have more natural disasters, hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding, drought, screw the planet. 

97% of the scientists around the world agree man is contributing to climate change but **** no the Republicans in Washington are the experts when it comes to climate science.

[Bugs 455]

34 minutes ago, Teddy B said:

I'm still holding out hope that lead paint and asbestos will make a comeback. Buy low and sell high!!

 

And, with the current EPA cutbacks, better do it quick.

[IAMX 3,055]

2 hours ago, Leon & Mylen said:

Which of these things did 97%

False and made up consensus based on political criteria and oft stupid assertions like "climate change is real". Try again.