Jump to content
FayJay

The work thing...

 Share

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

My POE was also Calgary and they do not give you any stamp or work authorization at all.

Feb 17/06 - I-129F Petition sent

Mar 1/06 - I-129F NOA1

May 12/06 - I-129F NOA2

June 7/06 - Packet 3 rec'd

Sept 6/06 - Packet 3 sent

Sept 15/06 - Rec'd letter with interview date

Sept 28/06 - Interview in Vancouver,BC and Visa in hand!

March 13/07 - US Entry

March 15/07 - WEDDING DAY

March 21/07 - AOS application & Interview through DORA Day 1

April 13/07 - Rec'd letter with Bio Appt. date Day 24

April 27/07 - Biometrics Appointment "touched" Day 38

April 30/07 - "Touched" Day 40

June 8/07 - Day 79...still waiting, haven't been touched or heard anything.

June 13/07 - Day 84..... I'm not having much faith in this DORA process..... closing in on the 90 day time frame real fast.....

June 19/07 - Day 90 ......nothing (Hubby calls Senator's Office)

June 20/07 - Day 91 - Got the "70 Day Letter" in the mail today :-(

June 22/07 - Mailed out EAD and AP by Priority Post Day 93

June 24/07 - EAD rec'd at Chicago Lockbox

June 29/07 - Day 100 - Infopass appt in OKC..... AOS stuck in name check

July 3/07 - Day 104 - Rec'd NOA for EAD

July 6/07 - Day 107 - Rec'd letter for EAD Bio Appt. for July 18th

July 18/07 -Biometrics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Okay , so I have read over the I-9 Handbook for Employers. What I was able to gather was not that the requirement for proof of employment authorization needed to be a replacement.......it simply states " applied for". If the k-1 by it's very nature is employment authorized, then how would a law be broken by working using a receipt for the EAD? Can't a K-1 apply for EAD without being married based on the visa alone?

Another thing is , the handbook says to the employer that they may employ a person who is legally authorized to work by accepting a receipt for proof and having the employeee certify they are authorized. How is an employer to know the EA's are allowed under different codes?

On page 4 of the handbook ( page 6 of the PDF) section 3 instructions for the employer,Reverifying Employment Authorization for Current Employees, paragraph 2 it states;

"To maintain continuous employment eligibility, an employee with temporary work authorization should apply for new work authorization at least 90 days before the current expiration date. If the Service fails to adjudicate the application for employment authorization within 90 days, then the employee will be authorized for employment on Form I-688B for a period not to exceed 240 days"

http://www.osha.gov/pls/epub/wageindex.dow...I9_Handbook.pdf

someone please make sense of that for me

Does the work authorization for the K-1 expire in 90 days or does it expire once the k-1 holder marries?

Maybe Im not getting it. Maybe Im interpretting it the way I want it to read........although this will never benefit us. Couldn't a k-1 holder, enter on the k-1 w/out the stamp , apply for an EAD and gain employment by using the receipt....at the end of that EAD vaildity apply for another EAD and continue working using that receipt?

google.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Wow that gave me a headache... But seems like you make a valid point. I'll read more into it and see if I can get anything else from it.

You know, I never thought to ask my HR Director if he knows anything about hiring someone going through this process. It might be worth a try.

Edited by piosenka

K1 Visa Journey

Met through an MMORPG: April 2005

Met in person: 9/23/2005

He proposed in front of Buckingham fountain: 8/20/2006

Sent I-129: 12/21/06

NOA1: 12/29/06

Touched: 3/27/06 (Happy belated bday to meee :P)

Received Email that they sent NOA2 yesterday!: 3/28/07

NOA2 in ze mail: 4/2/07

Called NVC to see if they have received the case and they haven't :( 4/13/07 and 4/19/07

NVC sent packet to MTL today! 4/24/07 (took 4 weeks from notice date)

MTL sent packet to my lawyer 5/2/07

Lawyer received Packet 3 finally! 5/17/07

Sent Packet 3 5/22/07

Now on the waiting list for an interview! 5/29/2007

Fiance gets his medical done: 7/16/07

Scheduled for Interview!: 10/24/07

Visa arrives!: 10/26/07

Fiance will be entering US: 1/18/08

Married: 2/4/08

Religious Ceremony: 4/5/08

AOS/EAD

Filling Date for AOS/EAD: 4/19/08

NOA: 5/01/08

Biometrics: 5/21/08

CSC Transfer Date 5/29/08

EAD Approved/Card Ordered 6/30/2008

EAD Card Arrived 7/11/2008

Green Card Production 7/23/2008

Removal of Conditions

Filing Date for RoC: 7/13/2010

Check Cashed: 7/15/2010

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Mexico
Timeline
Okay , so I have read over the I-9 Handbook for Employers. What I was able to gather was not that the requirement for proof of employment authorization needed to be a replacement.......it simply states " applied for". If the k-1 by it's very nature is employment authorized, then how would a law be broken by working using a receipt for the EAD? Can't a K-1 apply for EAD without being married based on the visa alone?

Another thing is , the handbook says to the employer that they may employ a person who is legally authorized to work by accepting a receipt for proof and having the employeee certify they are authorized. How is an employer to know the EA's are allowed under different codes?

On page 4 of the handbook ( page 6 of the PDF) section 3 instructions for the employer,Reverifying Employment Authorization for Current Employees, paragraph 2 it states;

"To maintain continuous employment eligibility, an employee with temporary work authorization should apply for new work authorization at least 90 days before the current expiration date. If the Service fails to adjudicate the application for employment authorization within 90 days, then the employee will be authorized for employment on Form I-688B for a period not to exceed 240 days"

http://www.osha.gov/pls/epub/wageindex.dow...I9_Handbook.pdf

someone please make sense of that for me

Does the work authorization for the K-1 expire in 90 days or does it expire once the k-1 holder marries?

Maybe Im not getting it. Maybe Im interpretting it the way I want it to read........although this will never benefit us. Couldn't a k-1 holder, enter on the k-1 w/out the stamp , apply for an EAD and gain employment by using the receipt....at the end of that EAD vaildity apply for another EAD and continue working using that receipt?

Try looking at it this way - K1 holders are authorized to work which means they have the right to work - with proper authorization which is an Employment Authorization Document (temporary or permanent). B2 holders, for example, are not work authorized and cannot obtain an EAD.

To obtain a work authorization document other than a temp stamp at the POE, you have to apply for it once you are married.

Whether or not you can gain employment by using the receipt is up to the employer. A K1 holder cannot technically get into trouble for working without an EAD because marriage to a USC "forgives" this. It is the employer who will face fines and penalties if they cannot provide proof that their employees are not only are authorized to work but also have an official work authorization document. (An SSN is actually not a requirement although most employers require this as the acceptable form of identification). Hope this clarifies rather than confuses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...