Maxine Waters admits there is no 'actual evidence' of collusion

[eieio 1,594]

6 minutes ago, ready4ONE said:

There isn't a single person in this thread denying that there is anything to investigate in regards to the Trump campaign and Russia that has ever given even the slightest grudging agreement that anything Dear Leader has said or done was ever worthy of critism. How can there be reasonable discussion critiquing The Donald if his followers can admit nothing short of perfection?

There is nothing to investigate. Never was, never will be. 

 

 

[jg121783 3,915]

5 hours ago, ccneat said:

You have inserted untrue statements in a smattering of partially true statements. The investigation is not being run by democrats and no one thinks the election will or should be turned back. So your premise of who is driving the investigation and why it is happening is false. No cause for investigation? You have had one retired general resign because he broke the law and lied about it and  our state secrets and national security were potentially compromised. Does it end there? No Manafort, maybe Stone and others close to the president have received compensation from Russian operatives. And now, for reasons unknown, the president is acting like he wants to obstruct the investigation and probably has. 

There is a lot to sort out. The president needs to ensure that Congress and the special counsel have everything they need to get through this speedily. People lying and hiding just embarrasses this country more.

Can you prove any of what is in bold? Didn't think so. Just more wild accusations in response to requests for actual evidence.

4 hours ago, CaliCat said:

 

The issue at hand is whether there was/is collusion between the Trump campaign/administration and foreign governments. The whining you hear are the supporters of the so-called president screaming and hollering trying to convince themselves there is nothing there. Maybe the whining you're so tired of is coming from the echo chamber?

 

 

So the people asking for evidence are the whiners? Don't think so. The people making wild accusations and throwing temper tantrums about the election results are the whiners.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

18 minutes ago, eieio said:

There is nothing to investigate. Never was, never will be. 

 

 

You got to be wrong. Someone just said not a single person on chest thinks that 

[CaliCat 3,957]

13 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

So the people asking for evidence are the whiners? Don't think so. The people making wild accusations and throwing temper tantrums about the election results are the whiners.

 

[eieio 1,594]

20 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

You got to be wrong. Someone just said not a single person on chest thinks that 

Well....I just went back and wrote a memo to myself.  Now I have indisputable proof what I thought.

[IAMX 3,055]

46 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Can you prove any of what is in bold? Didn't think so. Just more wild accusations in response to requests for actual evidence.

So the people asking for evidence are the whiners? Don't think so. The people making wild accusations and throwing temper tantrums about the election results are the whiners.

Only true patriots act on presumption, especially when it comes to provoking World War 3.

 

No need for proof, a distraction meme is sufficient. 

Edited May 21, 2017 by IAMX

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

1 hour ago, eieio said:

There is nothing to investigate. Never was, never will be. 

 

 

Then take it up with Republicans in Congress and the deputy AG

[eieio 1,594]

11 minutes ago, ccneat said:

Then take it up with Republicans in Congress and the deputy AG

Time will prove me correct. 

[ready4ONE 5,400]

3 hours ago, eieio said:

There is nothing to investigate. Never was, never will be. 

 

 

My point is made. 

[TBoneTX 45,273]

Congressman Al Green (of the Houston area) called for the President's impeachment, got death threats called into his office, and played the threats in uncensored fashion at a town-hall meeting.

 

I didn't see (or must have missed) Rep. Green's initial call for impeachment, to hear how reasoned (or unreasoned) it was.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

7 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Congressman Al Green (of the Houston area) called for the President's impeachment, got death threats called into his office, and played the threats in uncensored fashion at a town-hall meeting.

 

I didn't see (or must have missed) Rep. Green's initial call for impeachment, to hear how reasoned (or unreasoned) it was.

We will always have politicians and commentators wave banners for drama in these situations.  What we don't have is a unified view that we need to get to the bottom of these issues by dispelling the rumours , establishing the facts and bringing any breaches of our law or ethics. 

 

We now have four congressional  investigations and Robert Muller in place , we all need to get behind these efforts and wait for the outcome

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

[Dashinka 24,492]

7 minutes ago, ccneat said:

We will always have politicians and commentators wave banners for drama in these situations.  What we don't have is a unified view that we need to get to the bottom of these issues by dispelling the rumours , establishing the facts and bringing any breaches of our law or ethics. 

 

We now have four congressional  investigations and Robert Muller in place , we all need to get behind these efforts and wait for the outcome

How can we have a unified view when the deck is stacked and there is so much grandstanding on one side with help from the biased media that also appears to have an agenda.  It seems to me that all this bloviating is only serving to taint the investigation and you have to wonder why they are doing this?  Have they seen classified evidence that doesn't lead anywhere?  Are they seeing evidence that points to wrongdoing by the previous administration and they want to mitigate that?  Let the FBI andnow the special investigator do their job and hopefully wrap this up ASAP, they have been at it for over six months, so I would think it would be close, and before anyone says anything Comey was not leading the investigation, it is actual working folks in the agency doing the work which based on what we have been hearing has not stopped.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

2 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

How can we have a unified view when the deck is stacked and there is so much grandstanding on one side with help from the biased media that also appears to have an agenda.  It seems to me that all this bloviating is only serving to taint the investigation and you have to wonder why they are doing this?  Have they seen classified evidence that doesn't lead anywhere?  Are they seeing evidence that points to wrongdoing by the previous administration and they want to mitigate that?  Let the FBI andnow the special investigator do their job and hopefully wrap this up ASAP, they have been at it for over six months, so I would think it would be close, and before anyone says anything Comey was not leading the investigation, it is actual working folks in the agency doing the work which based on what we have been hearing has not stopped.

Why should the investigation stop?  

[Dashinka 24,492]

1 minute ago, ccneat said:

Why should the investigation stop?  

I thought everyone has been saying President Trump obstructed justice based on a memo James Comey wrote to himself in his weak imitation of J.E. Hoover.

 

As we know, the investigations, plural, have not stopped.