Trump: No Politician in history has been treated WORSE

[Dashinka 24,848]

4 hours ago, CaliCat said:

 

So, you're OK with the Russians interfering in our elections because they helped your candidate? Would you be that commie-friendly if it turned out Putin had interfered to secure Hillary's victory?

You have to define interfering.  If you mean did someone hack the DNC and actually put out more truthful stories about Hillary than the current media did?  Then yes, I am fine with that.  If you mean did they hack voting machines and change the count?  Then no.  However, there is no evidence of the second item occurring as Jill Stein proved by her pointless recounts.  

[Dashinka 24,848]

5 hours ago, Teddy B said:

I agree, there aren't any true journalists anymore. No one cares about how factual the story is, they only care about being the first to get the story out.

And get as many hits, or views, or sold papers as possible to satisfy the advertisers.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

3 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Trump could save 100 children from a burning building but fail to save a cat that was in the same building and the headlines would read. "Trump allows cat to die in burning building". The article probably wouldn't even mention the 100 kids he saved.

What ever happened to "stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody" and not "lose any voters." ?

[CaliCat 3,957]

17 minutes ago, ccneat said:

What ever happened to "stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody" and not "lose any voters." ?

 

[IAMX 3,055]

2 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

You have to define interfering.  If you mean did someone hack the DNC and actually put out more truthful stories about Hillary than the current media did?  Then yes, I am fine with that.  If you mean did they hack voting machines and change the count?  Then no.  However, there is no evidence of the second item occurring as Jill Stein proved by her pointless recounts.  

They can't define anything.

 

Firstly, proof needs to be there that this was not only Russian.. but from the Russian government. Russians alone doesn't mean this was under Putin's orders anymore than random Americans means this was Trump or Obama's orders.

 

Secondly, Wikileaks has already shown that the data from the DNC is not Russian. 

 

Apparently the left wish to believe anonymous sources in the media (that clearly are very wrong far, far more often than they're right) instead of the leaks that show staffers at the DNC are idiots who don't know how not to click a phishing email and input sensitive data. 

 

If we recall when people were jumping on Tillerson during the confirmation hearings, when there was a blitz to oppose every single Trump cabinet member, apparently people in globalist companies aren't ever allowed to do business with Russia, or else (insert narrative here). Then of course with Sessions apparently he meets with other diplomats, as was part of his job as a Senator, and suddenly he's in bed with the Russians. It's a nice way of thinking, except that Democrat cabinet members regularly do business with countries like Russia, and regularly talk to Russian diplomats, as proven with I believe it was Claire McCaskill.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

2 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

You have to define interfering.  If you mean did someone hack the DNC and actually put out more truthful stories about Hillary than the current media did?  Then yes, I am fine with that.  If you mean did they hack voting machines and change the count?  Then no.  However, there is no evidence of the second item occurring as Jill Stein proved by her pointless recounts.  

On what principal would you be fine with criminal trespass with the intent to influence the outcome of a Federal Election?

Turn this around and have the Russians breach RNC files and the files of the Trump campaign.  You would cheerlead that effort as ok?  Why?  

 

Does  the End consequence align with your world view so by any means possible let your side prevail ( you did champion not corrupting the election, good on ya) regardless of the law ( and folks have done hard Federal prison time for lesser hacks on a lark)  

 

 The outcome of the breaching didn't even reveal anything of consequence but it gave great fodder for folks looking to pin devil worship and pedophilia on your political opponent.   

 

 

Edited May 19, 2017 by ccneat

[Jacque67 7,328]

2 minutes ago, ccneat said:

On what principal would you be fine with criminal trespass with the intent to influence the outcome of a Federal Election

Turn this around and have the Russians breach RNC files and the files of the Trump campaign.  You would cheerlead that effort as ok?  Why?  

 

Does  the End consequence align with your world view so by any means possible let your side prevail ( you did champion not corrupting the election, good on ya) regardless of the law ( and folks have done hard Federal prison time for lesser hacks on a lark)  

 

 The outcome of the breaching didn't even reveal anything of consequence but it gave great fodder for folks looking to pin devil worship and pedophilia on your political opponent.   

 

 

Wiki leaks =GRU propaganda machine. Assange sold out bigly. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

29 minutes ago, ccneat said:

On what principal would you be fine with criminal trespass with the intent to influence the outcome of a Federal Election?

Turn this around and have the Russians breach RNC files and the files of the Trump campaign.  You would cheerlead that effort as ok?  Why?  

 

Does  the End consequence align with your world view so by any means possible let your side prevail ( you did champion not corrupting the election, good on ya) regardless of the law ( and folks have done hard Federal prison time for lesser hacks on a lark)  

 

 The outcome of the breaching didn't even reveal anything of consequence but it gave great fodder for folks looking to pin devil worship and pedophilia on your political opponent.   

 

 

Criminal trespass with intent to influence a federal election.  Ladies and gentlemen Elvis has left the building 

 

Ps there is solid proof that one election was influenced  and only one. Oddly enough the MDL is really not bothered by it 

Edited May 19, 2017 by Nature Boy Flair

[IAMX 3,055]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Criminal trespass with intent to influence a federal election.  Ladies and gentlemen Elvis has left the building 

 

Ps there is solid proof that one election was influenced  and only one. Oddly enough the MDL is really not bothered by it 

We've got a new sheriff in town. He's armed with Wikipedia and a mountain of a narrative. Beware villains. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 minute ago, IAMX said:

We've got a new sheriff in town. He's armed with Wikipedia and a mountain of a narrative. Beware villains. 

Hey the DNC and Hillary  got caught red handed stealing an election. Hey !  Look quick over there it's a Russian.  The sheepople run to the light. 🤣

[IAMX 3,055]

2 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Hey the DNC and Hillary  got caught red handed stealing an election. Hey !  Look quick over there it's a Russian.  The sheepople run to the light. 🤣

You deny my fullproof theory? Why do you hate America so much? Why do you hate science so much?

Edited May 19, 2017 by IAMX

[CaliCat 3,957]

33 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Criminal trespass with intent to influence a federal election.  Ladies and gentlemen Elvis has left the building 

 

Ps there is solid proof that one election was influenced  and only one. Oddly enough the MDL is really not bothered by it 

 

 

Well, an investigation is underway. Until then, 

 

 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

3 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

 

Well, an investigation is underway. Until then, 

 

 

Only in America could you get caught red handed stealing an election and get the media to pump out so much propaganda,  that the gullible blame the guy who won an election fair and square..

 

It's scary actually,   all this derangement  and not one single sheep is talking about the real election that was stolen. 

[CaliCat 3,957]

Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

Only in America could you get caught red handed stealing an election and get the media to pump out so much propaganda,  that the gullible blame the guy who won an election fair and square..

 

It's scary actually,   all this derangement  and not one single sheep is talking about the real election that was stolen. 

 

Kim Jong Un must be green with envy. Even he doesn't get this type of blind devotion and commitment. Drink on.

 

 

[IAMX 3,055]

10 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Only in America could you get caught red handed stealing an election and get the media to pump out so much propaganda,  that the gullible blame the guy who won an election fair and square..

 

It's scary actually,   all this derangement  and not one single sheep is talking about the real election that was stolen. 

The funny thing about the image you quoted is CNN calling them ramparts. tfw propaganda organizations can't even get it right when all they've done for the last year is cover Russia endlessly.