I-751 May 2017 Filers

[gc@gc 184]

1 hour ago, Jameson78 said:

They won't give you a straight answer until it's been 16.5 months since you filed it, FYI. The reason is that they're lazy government employees who don't care about you and, unlike private sector employees, have no accountability. It's not because you're on a terror watchlist or they think you are committing marriage fraud or anything. Unfortunately, it'll get done when it gets done.

 

i dont think it is fair to make such statement about government employees like that

[gc@gc 184]

4 minutes ago, designbg said:

For those of us who filed with CSC and have not received a status update since the biometrics were taken, we may still be subjected to RFE. And now that USCIS is giving their officers discretion to deny applications without proper notification or RFE, this becomes very subjective.

 

When I initially filled for my GC back in 2015, they lost my birth certificate (original copy by the way) and issued an RFE for a copy of my birth certificate, without even acknowledging that they lost it. If that practice existed back then, my case would have been disapproved for a problem they themselves created by losing my birth certificate.

 

 

why did you submitted your original copy of birth certificate? 

 

[Jameson78 32]

16 minutes ago, gc@gc said:

 

i dont think it is fair to make such statement about government employees like that

Lol, have you ever met any? On several occasions, I've genuinely thought that they have learning difficulties. Maybe they did and maybe they didn't, but it's obviously a job creation program for people who have degrees but cannot compete in the private sector.

[gc@gc 184]

1 minute ago, Jameson78 said:

Lol, have you ever met any? On several occasions, I've genuinely thought that they have learning difficulties. Maybe they did and maybe they didn't, but it's obviously a job creation program for people who have degrees but cannot compete in the private sector.

 

oh well,  i worked in private sector and also government agencies

[designbg 27]

1 hour ago, gc@gc said:

 

 

why did you submitted your original copy of birth certificate? 

 

Because my birth certificate had to be translated, and they requested I provide the original along with the translation...that once my case is adjudicated I could request my original documents back.

[gc@gc 184]

22 minutes ago, designbg said:

Because my birth certificate had to be translated, and they requested I provide the original along with the translation...that once my case is adjudicated I could request my original documents back.

 

hmm, it is interesting, my knowledge is that one can simply make copy of the original certificate, attaching the translation, 

[Hiroshi 6]

When do you think we will hear something from CSC? Any update will be good 427 days and counting. I saw that someone got approved from March CSC. Just wondering if anyone has heard anything back? 

[frontgear 194]

Don't mean to drag politics into this discussion but I think the government is giving people who came here ILLEGALLY higher priority than most of us who are still waiting at CSC or a few who filed at VSC with little or no attention.

Edited July 18, 2018 by frontgear

[Novemberfiler 7]

20 hours ago, David... said:

Don’t worry thts for “when u sent ur application” tht time USCIS may reject without RFE if the application isn’t complete, wrong application or if it is not up to their standard.

Oh david, you,he and everybody else should be worried. The policy is as clear as day, starting september 11, 2018 all applications will be affected, those that were filed before that date included, only exeption is daca filers before that date. It had nothing to do with initial review, that policy has always been implemented. When they recieve your case they look at it, if something is missing it gets rejected and sent back, no rfe or itd is sent. This policy is clearly talking about adjudicating an application. So yes what it means is that there will be tons of denials without any prior intent to deny or rfe notices being sent, think about how many people get rfe mainly and maybe few itd, now all of them will be denied starting september 11, 2018. The scary part is that its open to io interpretation as to how complete or incomplete is a case, just like the new question being added on n400 form, regarding committing or aiding in committing a crime or thinking about it, when asked about what would be considered a crime the uscis representative replied, driving 5miles over the speed limit could count. You shoud worry my friend and try not to speed

Edited July 18, 2018 by Novemberfiler

[Jameson78 32]

2 minutes ago, Novemberfiler said:

Oh david, you,he and everybody else should be worried. The policy is as clear as day, starting september 11, 2018 all applications will be affected, those that were filed before that date included, only exeption is daca filers before that date. It had nothing to do with initial review, that policy has always been implemented. When they recieve your case they look at it, if something is missing it gets rejected and sent back, no rfe or itd is sent. This policy is clearly talking about adjudicating an application. So yes what it means is that there will be tons of denials without any prior intent to deny or rfe notices being sent, think about how many people get rfe mainly and maybe few itd, now all of them will be denied starting september 11, 2018. The scary part is that its open to io interpretation as to how compete is the case, just like the new question being added on n400 form, regarding committing or aiding in committing a crime or thinking about it, when asked about what would be considered a crime the uscis representative replied, driving 5miles over the speed the limit could count. You shoud worry my friend and try not to speed

If you read it, it is to prevent obviously fraudulent or meritless applications. They aren't going to give you a straight denial because you didn't send enough bank statements or the full tax transcripts instead of the main pages, if the rest of the application looks reasonable. Don't troll people, sure it can be funny, especially when teasing third worlders, but it shows bad faith.

[Novemberfiler 7]

2 minutes ago, Jameson78 said:

If you read it, it is to prevent obviously fraudulent or meritless applications. They aren't going to give you a straight denial because you didn't send enough bank statements or the full tax transcripts instead of the main pages, if the rest of the application looks reasonable. Don't troll people, sure it can be funny, especially when teasing third worlders, but it shows bad faith.

Am not trolling anyone,  just reading the text and giving my opinion. You are the troll who is living on a different planet. Who cares about the words, it's the deeds that matter, don't you see what's happening?. All am doing is trying to make sure that who ever reads David's and your baseless posts take the new policy seriously

[Jameson78 32]

4 minutes ago, Novemberfiler said:

Am not trolling anyone,  just reading the text and giving my opinion. You are the troll who is living on a different planet. Who cares about the words, it's the deeds that matter, don't you see what's happening?. All am doing is trying to make sure that who ever reads David's and your baseless posts take the new policy seriously

Read it again. It is very obviously aimed at people who submit placeholder applications, or applications which contain very little of the evidence or facts required to support positive adjudication of the application. You'll get a straight denial if you file an I-751 with no documents, or with a shell bank account with no activity and nothing else, and no explanatory note. if you send a complete application, but with (say) incomplete tax transcripts, no executed lease, or documents not covering the entire time you've been in the U.S. before filing it, then you'll get an RFE. It's not hard to grasp.

Edited July 18, 2018 by Jameson78

[Novemberfiler 7]

4 minutes ago, Jameson78 said:

Read it again. It is very obviously aimed at people who submit placeholder applications, or applications which contain very little of the evidence or facts required to support positive adjudication of the application. You'll get a straight denial if you file an I-751 with no documents, or with a shell bank account with no activity and nothing else, and no explanatory note. if you send a complete application, but with (say) incomplete tax transcripts, no executed lease, or documents not covering the entire time you've been in the U.S. before filing it, then you'll get an RFE. It's not hard to grasp.

I read it a couple of times. I agree with that a 100%.that they will not deny you for sending only the main pages of tax returns or only few bank statements.but who gets the bulk of the rfe anyway, its mostly filers with little evidence. My reply to David was mainly because he said that policy means when reviewing your form after recieving it not during adjudication, and that's not true. I hope i am wrong but i still believe anyone who's filing any immigration application should be more careful now days, you know as much as i do that there's a ton of new memorandums and policy updates being implemented every day, as well as the political atmosphere regarding immigration is changing . You can't possibly still be naive to think its only directed against illegal immigrants which have nothing to do with any of these immigration benifits applications anyway, or for the .001% who try to game the system. Even though the words might be translated to that meaning. 

[Novemberfiler 7]

22 minutes ago, Jameson78 said:

Read it again. It is very obviously aimed at people who submit placeholder applications, or applications which contain very little of the evidence or facts required to support positive adjudication of the application. You'll get a straight denial if you file an I-751 with no documents, or with a shell bank account with no activity and nothing else, and no explanatory note. if you send a complete application, but with (say) incomplete tax transcripts, no executed lease, or documents not covering the entire time you've been in the U.S. before filing it, then you'll get an RFE. It's not hard to grasp.

Those who file with no supprting documents and no evidence get their files sent back. This policy is not directed against them.

[gc@gc 184]

2 hours ago, frontgear said:

Don't mean to drag politics into this discussion but I think the government is giving people who came here ILLEGALLY higher priority than most of us who are still waiting at CSC or a few who filed at VSC with little or no attention.

 

daca came to the states when they were very young and with their parents,  they didnt really have to ability to make such decision then and their parents made for them, i wouldnt call them illegal. i would believe those children have suffered enough all those years.

 

government is just trying to be compassionate to take care of this group of people, it would be great helpful to their growing: physically and mentally.

 

i can hardly image if one would like to live in a country lack of human and compassionate. 

 

we should alway remember why we come to the states for.