Trump interview with Dickerson ~Face the Nation

[Dashinka 24,848]

17 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

I have to disagree, Trump offers way more fodder than anyone, the daily drama carousel keeps turning. I was hoping it would let up. Nope.

I think it is a matter of perspective.  With all of Hillary's live fire dodging, and her campaign's special relationship with the DNC to Bernie's expense, and her foreign affairs through the CGI not to mention her nice private email server, and the leaked campaign emails, there was a ton of fodder from her camp.  That the press covered it differently than Trump was fairly evident.

[IAMX 3,055]

22 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I think it is a matter of perspective.  With all of Hillary's live fire dodging, and her campaign's special relationship with the DNC to Bernie's expense, and her foreign affairs through the CGI not to mention her nice private email server, and the leaked campaign emails, there was a ton of fodder from her camp.  That the press covered it differently than Trump was fairly evident.

I have no idea how you maintain a somewhat-neutral standpoint on that.

 

It sure as hell is as obvious as day the media was anointed official Bernie and Trump opposition, and official Hillary fellating cheerleaders. The left actually sort-of clued in on this during the primaries, and even a number of them protesting Hillary's nomination. Then it died down and, like Bernie, they just came on with a case of self-induced amnesia and forgot all about it to join in on the DNC eff-the-voters campaign.

Edited May 2, 2017 by IAMX

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

3 hours ago, IAMX said:

Proof?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)

 

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/09/nsa-timeline-surveillance

 

http://www.mercurynews.com/2008/07/10/bush-signs-new-rules-on-government-wiretapping/

 

I do not have a lot of respect for someone who makes claims and is unable to prove it.
You were asked to show proof to substantiate your claim Obama was the most corrupt president.
You were asked to show proof that Obama started the NSA wiretapping.
You weaseled out both times.
Time for you to do some research before you use your key board.
Would you like some ketchup with the egg on your face ?

I would think you would at least google the hint I gave you about the NOVA documentary on wiretapping.

[IAMX 3,055]

2 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

You were asked to show proof that Obama started the NSA wiretapping.

Waiting on proof that I ever claimed this. Wipe off the egg and go find it.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

11 minutes ago, IAMX said:

Waiting on proof that I ever claimed this. Wipe off the egg and go find it.

Page 3. You said I was wrong that Bush started the wiretapping and asked for proof.

 

[IAMX 3,055]

1 minute ago, Ebunoluwa said:

Page 3. You said I was wrong that Bush started the wiretapping and asked for proof.

 

Feel free to quote your post then quote my post. Let's teach you a lesson of reading comprehension.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

Just now, IAMX said:

Feel free to quote your post then quote my post. Let's teach you a lesson of reading comprehension.

I think you are either trolling the forum, are 12 or have been drinking.
I do not play your word games. You can't hold a discussion. Period.

 

[IAMX 3,055]

 

7 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

I think you are either trolling the forum, are 12 or have been drinking.
I do not play your word games. You can't hold a discussion. Period.

 

 

Hey buddy, it's you who can't read worth a damn.

 

 

You're the one who created the "Obama started the wiretapping" nonsense. You want me to refute claims you're making about my posts when clearly your reading is terrible and you want me to back up claims you pulled right out of Obama's butt.

 

On top of the fact that you created an argument out of nothing and put words in my mouth to try and argue, here's a post from a month ago of me saying exactly the opposite of what you claim..

 

 

On 4/11/2017 at 7:14 PM, IAMX said:

The existing harmonious environment you describe, as of today, are the corporate world and government colluding. Here's an example from Obama in how he "integrates":

 

- Endlessly criticizes Bush as a State and US Senator over warrantless wiretaps

- Campaigns in 2008 saying he will change it 

- It's down to him and Hillary, his campaign advisers and the polls both know he is gonna beat Hillary down at the convention, his odds of being President are significantly in his favor

- Obama goes to DNC, who ironically include AT&T, one of the companies implicated in lawsuits for happily obliging the NSA, who also happen to be the Denver DNC sponsors.. Obama goes to private parties with them, changes his stances on the wiretaps

- Gets elected

- Immediately defends the Bush wiretaps in court

- Signs FISA amendment giving AT&T retroactive immunity tossing out lawsuits against them

 

So this kind of integration is the one you want? That's the only integration I saw until Trump.

So much for that "Would you like some ketchup with the egg on your face ?" comment. 

 

Clearly I'm arguing with someone who can't even read and wants me to debate imaginary arguments they come up with. Have fun with that.

 

And please, next time, learn how to debate people who are way above your intellect before you start strutting around like a clown. You don't need me involved to argue with imaginary stuff.

Edited May 3, 2017 by IAMX

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

8 minutes ago, IAMX said:

 

 

Hey buddy, it's you who can't read worth a damn.

 

 

You're the one who created the "Obama started the wiretapping" nonsense. You want me to refute claims you're making about my posts when clearly your reading is terrible and you want me to back up claims you pulled right out of Obama's butt.

 

On top of the fact that you created an argument out of nothing and put words in my mouth to try and argue, here's a post from a month ago of me saying exactly the opposite of what you claim..

 

 

So much for that "Would you like some ketchup with the egg on your face ?" comment. 

 

Clearly I'm arguing with someone who can't even read and wants me to debate imaginary arguments they come up with. Have fun with that.

 

And please, next time, learn how to debate people who are way above your intellect before you start strutting around like a clown. You don't need me involved to argue with imaginary stuff.

 

 

You would make Trump proud with your style of meaning one thing and saying another.
You baited me with your proof, proof, proof posts and I obliged. How childish. Adults clarify misunderstandings. You play games.
You could have clarified that you understood that when I said Bush initiated it, but instead you

pulled a Trump mumbo jumbo for the dramatic effect.
If you think you are above my intellect and that makes you feel all tingly and bigley then go for that assumption.
I am not in a pissing contest with you about who has more intellect.

As for a list on Obama being the most corrupt you did not deliver.
The most corrupt will remain Trump and his 75 law suits, his corrupt "university", his failure to pay

workers for finished jobs then and his shady business dealings with countries.

If you think Trump will change the wiretapping then you are mistaken.

 

[IAMX 3,055]

15 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

You baited me with your proof, proof, proof posts and I obliged. How childish. Adults clarify misunderstandings. You play games.

I accept your apology.  But really, I couldn't be any more clear in the quote and post of mine I just showed a screenshot of.. the slipping on that poop and lying face down in it, that's all you. Own it.

 

Edited May 3, 2017 by IAMX

[CaliCat 3,957]

31 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

You would make Trump proud with your style of meaning one thing and saying another.
You baited me with your proof, proof, proof posts and I obliged. How childish. Adults clarify misunderstandings. You play games.
You could have clarified that you understood that when I said Bush initiated it, but instead you

pulled a Trump mumbo jumbo for the dramatic effect.
If you think you are above my intellect and that makes you feel all tingly and bigley then go for that assumption.
I am not in a pissing contest with you about who has more intellect.

As for a list on Obama being the most corrupt you did not deliver.
The most corrupt will remain Trump and his 75 law suits, his corrupt "university", his failure to pay

workers for finished jobs then and his shady business dealings with countries.

If you think Trump will change the wiretapping then you are mistaken.

 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

43 minutes ago, IAMX said:

I accept your apology.  But really, I couldn't be any more clear in the quote and post of mine I just showed a screenshot of.. the slipping on that poop and lying face down in it, that's all you. Own it.

 

Well you did claim that Obama was the epitome of corruption and continue to have nothing to back that claim up.  You clearly have confused your dislike for the Man or his brand of politics with pablum from the cess pool of "alternative news" with "alternative facts" you are so enamored with.  

 

  On 5/1/2017 at 4:02 PM, IAMX said:

Not to mention all the idiots colluding with the Clinton campaign.. which included a few conservative media outlets.

 

Makes @Ebunoluwadoting on the media as responsible "mirror" all the funnier. Obama was the epitome of corruption, along with Hillary, and the media gave them such a pass on their corruption, if not outright helping them push forth propaganda, it's disgusting anyone can think this is responsible ethics. I don't mean their pundit shows, I don't care how left or right those get, I just mean their news. And it shows how much they're distrusted by how many people are turning to alternative news. 

 

The left are evidently too dumb to get this even when corruption of their own party's primaries showed how crooked the media is, and how the "party" works with the media to put forth propaganda. No one in their right mind would trust that party after what happened to Sanders, nor the media. Yet, here we are, where the left are whining about Trump's personality traits and spewing Russia conspiracy theories over verified corruption.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

51 minutes ago, IAMX said:

I accept your apology.  But really, I couldn't be any more clear in the quote and post of mine I just showed a screenshot of.. the slipping on that poop and lying face down in it, that's all you. Own it.

 

 

That wasn't an apology, it was an analysis of your posting style to make it your mission to deteriorate

any thread you disagree with to the point of baiting. You lack genuine interest in a good debate and awareness of clarification when misunderstandings arise.

It is juvenile to relish in it. Marinade in that sauce until throughly absorbed.

[TBoneTX 46,261]

Folks, knock off the bickering now, please.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

19 hours ago, CaliCat said:

 

You stole that from me , and i stole it from i forgot who