Why can’t the Clintons just go away?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

http://nypost.com/2017/04/22/why-cant-the-clintons-just-go-away/

[IAMX 3,055]

I liked these parts:

 

Quote

Every mistake made in her 2008 run was compounded in 2016: the paranoia, the staff infighting, the underestimation of the intra-party wild card, the self-righteousness, the failure to connect with average voters, the belief that because it was her turn the presidency would be hers. It’s “Groundhog Day” with global consequences.

Quote

 

Similarly, Hillary didn’t get why Bernie Sanders was resonating. Her worst defenses kicked in, fertilized by her top aides. “From the Clinton campaign’s perspective,” the authors write, Bernie “was getting an even easier ride from the media than Obama had in 2008.”

 

Hillary’s Twitter feed indicates that she’s learned nothing. She posts about social issues and identity politics through the prism of her loss. She remains woefully out of touch and she still doesn’t get what her husband did way back in 1992: It’s the economy, stupid.

 

Unless deprived of oxygen, Hillary and her cohort will press on, further retarding party progress. Stars such as Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand are fighting for column inches, airtime and party dominance as the Clintons stubbornly remain.

 

Two weeks ago, reports surfaced that Huma Abedin, long viewed by Hillary’s top aides as a major liability, is shopping a $2 million tell-all. Given that the book has Hillary’s blessing, and that Abedin’s husband, Anthony Weiner, remains under federal investigation for child pornography — and that she’s still married to Anthony Weiner — who really thinks she’s going to spill anything? It smacks of Abedin’s environment: another grubby Clinton-style cash grab, promising something she’ll never deliver.

 

Edited April 22, 2017 by IAMX

[ready4ONE 5,400]

The effort to keep talking down the Clintons' to deflect from the multiple failures of Donald Trump is fascinating.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

10 minutes ago, ready4ONE said:

The effort to keep talking down the Clintons' to deflect from the multiple failures of Donald Trump is fascinating.

speaking of fixations 

[ready4ONE 5,400]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

speaking of fixations 

Care to get yours off your chest?

[jg121783 3,921]

The Clintons are like a bad case of herpes. No one likes them but they will never go away.

[Dashinka 24,864]

1 hour ago, jg121783 said:

The Clintons are like a bad case of herpes. No one likes them but they will never go away.

Yes, they have to do whatever they can to maintain their lifestyle.  I wonder how many days Bill Clinton spends in the penthouse at the library in Arkansas?

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Seriously I am tired of talking about them and their whole family. Now the media keeps trying to shove Chelsea in everyone's face so that she can run for whatever. All the while not mentioning anything about her husbands failed hedgefund.

[IAMX 3,055]

1 hour ago, cyberfx1024 said:

Seriously I am tired of talking about them and their whole family. Now the media keeps trying to shove Chelsea in everyone's face so that she can run for whatever. All the while not mentioning anything about her husbands failed hedgefund.

Any complaints yet from the left about nepotism? 

[Dashinka 24,864]

21 hours ago, IAMX said:

Any complaints yet from the left about nepotism? 

Are you kidding?  They are always looking for the next Kennedy dynasty.  I think the Clintons and the Cuomos are the current front runners.

[Inikamoze 86]

3 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Are you kidding?  They are always looking for the next Kennedy dynasty.  I think the Clintons and the Cuomos are the current front runners.

Agree

Hence the Republicans felt they were falling behind and thus are getting behind Drumpf. All of them in it for the $$$'s.

[IAMX 3,055]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

Are you kidding?  They are always looking for the next Kennedy dynasty.  I think the Clintons and the Cuomos are the current front runners.

Makes sense, given I just read somewhere in this page about people daring "talk down" to the Clintons. LOL.

 

That poor helpless rich corrupt family. Don't you just wanna give them some of other peoples tax money?

 

[Inikamoze 86]

9 minutes ago, IAMX said:

Makes sense, given I just read somewhere in this page about people daring "talk down" to the Clintons. LOL.

 

That poor helpless rich corrupt family. Don't you just wanna give them some of other peoples tax money?

 

A line that read without knowledge of the thread that could easily be attributed to Trump don't you think.

[CaliCat 3,957]

15 minutes ago, Inikamoze said:

A line that read without knowledge of the thread that could easily be attributed to Trump don't you think.

 

Minus the poor. The Trumps are rich grifters.

[jg121783 3,921]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Are you kidding?  They are always looking for the next Kennedy dynasty.  I think the Clintons and the Cuomos are the current front runners.

The Kennedy family had it's share of corruption but JFK and RFK actually tried to do the right thing and look where it got them. If the democrats of today were aligned with the views of JFK and RFK I could actually get  behind them on many issues. The Clintons and the Democratic party today are nothing like the Kennedys. As far as the Clintons go it is all corruption with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.