I129F April 2017 filers

[lon552 437]

1 minute ago, tcovington said:

Don't understand the purpose though. I thought that was the point of the recent pay stubs. 

The main reason for the letter is to identify whether you're a temp or permanent hire and what your expected salary is. 

[tcovington 175]

2 minutes ago, lon552 said:

The main reason for the letter is to identify whether you're a temp or permanent hire and what your expected salary is. 

So then my sf-50 will suffice for this as it states all of this?

[An&In 80]

2 minutes ago, tcovington said:

Don't understand the purpose though. I thought that was the point of the recent pay stubs. 

To show history and consistency of you income. They want to make sure the petitioner can financially support the beneficiary without the support of the government like food stamps ect

[Chris2870 721]

2 minutes ago, tcovington said:

Don't understand the purpose though. I thought that was the point of the recent pay stubs. 

The point is too prove sustainability. If a person was too work for 3 months during the summer but did nothing else the rest of the year, they couldn't be confident that your Fiancé wouldn't become a public charge. Example

[asaeljethro 162]

4 minutes ago, tcovington said:

Don't understand the purpose though. I thought that was the point of the recent pay stubs. 

This is what it states according to the I-134F instruction form to go along as supporting evidences to the Affidavit of Support

 

B. Statement(s) from your employer on business stationery showing:
(1) Date and nature of employment;
(2) Salary paid; and
(3) Whether the position is temporary or permanent.

 

Having job offer letter from your company compliments your pay stubs.

[tcovington 175]

So then notice of personnel action is satisfactory?

[bjd 120]

Congrats Estibaliz!  Just looked back and saw you finally got your NOA2.  Well deserved for helping keep the rest of us sane!

Edited August 14, 2017 by bjd

[lon552 437]

6 minutes ago, tcovington said:

So then notice of personnel action is satisfactory?

I would think so because it is very comprehensive but I didn't find any references in a search.

[BahamaIslander242 244]

CONGRATULATIONS @Estibaliz!!! Well done with that announcement btw. lol

[tcovington 175]

25 minutes ago, lon552 said:

I would think so because it is very comprehensive but I didn't find any references in a search.

Thank you!

[Estibaliz 3,037]

1 hour ago, fatima& abdi said:

estibaliz omg girl i almost missed the news such a tricky . soo happy for u .and i  told u soo   congrats sweety and enjoy it 

Thank you! Yeah, we were right about the good feeling for this week, lol

 

2 hours ago, Chris2870 said:

Congratulations and we're happy for you @Estibaliz Hope you stay active in this thread..you're a great help when it comes to updates, trackers, etc..something that not all of us can figure out or the version of our apps don't show..hope we get ours too real soon..we've already catched up to our timeline so hoping it moves smoothly..you're now a step closer to being with your man, I'm so happy for you😊 Godbless❤️ Faye🌷

Thank you, Faye, you are a sweetie  I'm having a few busy days this week, but you are not going to get rid of me that easily. I'll be around to try and help as much as I can.

 

2 hours ago, sunj said:

@Estibaliz OMG yay well done, i'm so so happy for you and Gary, great job! Another step closer, can't wait to follow the rest of your journey!

 

Actually it was USCIS doing the job

Well, I guess our petition was nice and easy to work on it

[Estibaliz 3,037]

Thank you, @An&In, @etteniMTtocs, @Jeff and Alina, @asaeljethro, @bjd, @BahamaIslander242 and everyone of you that say congrats to us... I don't know if I'm forgetting someone and I'm sorry if that's the case.

You made this day more special... but now for the rest of the journey, as well as all your approvals if you still don't have it! 

[JessnTrev 84]

4 hours ago, Estibaliz said:

We, however, were approved before the estimated timelines. NOA2 comes in the mail today and our approval is dated August 10th, so 121 days since NOA1, 126 since received date.

 

Since it's a Monday, Gary telecommutes today, so I'll tell him to keep an eye on the postman when he wakes up

 

 

CONGRATULATIONS! my timeline date changed backwards one day yesterday the same as yours, so 14th. Trevor doesn't get home until another half an hour or more so i'm hoping there is good news for us too! I'm really happy for you! xx

[Estibaliz 3,037]

6 minutes ago, JessnTrev said:

CONGRATULATIONS! my timeline date changed backwards one day yesterday the same as yours, so 14th. Trevor doesn't get home until another half an hour or more so i'm hoping there is good news for us too! I'm really happy for you! xx

Thank you! I really hope you get good news today too... there's a chance

And if not, the week is long and it might be any day now. The sooner, the better

Fingers crossed for you and everyone else...

[USC1961 251]

20 hours ago, LabOz said:

It's a joke and anyone who would actually try to go to CSC and do that is a fool.

Never said anything about a RIOT.

It's called Levity.

I know full well they are doing the best they can with what the personnel and environment they have.

It's called putting something up on a public forum that COULD BE MISINTERPRETED.  I think we all agree it wasn't meant that way but again that's not the point.  Thanks for admitting it's a bad idea, even though no one (even me) took the idea seriously.     

 

20 hours ago, LabOz said:

Someone else posted the picture. I just made the comment. If people took it seriously or were offended oh well. Can't please everyone. Others found the Levity as a form of relief during this stressful time.

 

 Thank you for not putting words in my mouth as the other poster did and being respectful after the fact.  I apologize for calling you classless earlier.  That wasn't cool and I admit it.  in the end however we will simply disagree on this one, but I understand where you are coming from.  Whether you posted the picture or not you used it in your post and used it as a prop.  But point being again I never misinterpreted your post.  I simply stated it was a poor idea to put a suggestion like that on a message board joke or not.  And then the other poster decided to swoop in and really make a big deal out of my well thought out comment. 

 

Quote

Joke or not posting a picture of the CSC and suggesting a group of us go down there to riot is NOT COOL.  The guys and gals that work at USCIS deserve our upmost respect for all the extra work we gave them this year so far.  In addition the changes they must be going through with a new commander in chief only makes their jobs more stressful.  Remember immigration is a privilege and not a right!   So lets put our best foot forward and treat them the way we would like to be treated. 

That was my original post. My whole point was 1. I get its not a joke.  2. Joke or not it's not the best idea to post stuff like that.  We need to show these guys at USCIS some love for the hard work they have been putting in.  THAT WAS MY WHOLE POINT.  I wasn't offended in any way shape or form.  Not so much in the April thread, but in March there are countless knocks on USCIS and conspiracy theories with no basis ect. and it gets tiring.  Personally I wouldn't have vented and stated my frustration in the same way you did, but that's ok.  To each his own.
 

Quote

I hear what you're saying and agree with you if it were a serious statement.   There is no need to get all offended and make a mountain out of a mole hill when the original statement is obviously not serious and totally a joke.  This is a place where people can vent and express their feelings of a system which is so broken and flawed  

 

This was the other poster.  He CLEARLY puts words in my mouth TELLING ME there is no need to get offended when in the FIRST PLACE I WASN'T.  And then telling me this is a place where people can vent and express their feelings.  HUH?? Really??  I never said that LabOz couldn't express feelings.  I simply DISAGREED which does not equal being offended or "making a mountain out of a molehill".....sheesh.  I guess this poster MISSED the whole point about the golden rule.  *sigh*  

 

I admit I should have just ignored the poster as he/she misread my whole post. (Saying I was offended, making a mountain out of a molehill. *sigh*)  Point again, (and perhaps that was my fault for not being clear enough) things can get misinterpreted on a message board whether we like it or not.  That is what really irked me, not your original comment.  It irked me that I couldn't just make a well thought out comment without someone coming in and THEN MAKING A BIG DEAL OUT OF IT.  That's the last I'm going to say about this whole incident.  Hopefully we can all learn from this exchange and just be happy with our fellow thread mates who are getting their approvals.          

Edited August 14, 2017 by Cruise77