Russian Ambassador Kislyak Attended Trump Congressional Speech Tuesday – Sat With Democrats…

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/world/europe/sergey-kislyak-russian-ambassador.html?_r=0

[jg121783 3,921]

2 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

The photo doesn't even look legit on my cell phone. Don't make me get out my Alienware laptop.

 

35 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/world/europe/sergey-kislyak-russian-ambassador.html?_r=0

I knew the NY times puts out fake news but I wasn't aware they publish photoshopped images. First your excuse was the Republicans made the seating arrangements then the image was photoshopped.  What next?

[Dashinka 24,849]

12 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

The photo doesn't even look legit on my cell phone. Don't make me get out my Alienware laptop.

I could care less.  If you think the Russian ambassador is only talking to one political party then you are as naïve as the people that thought a video caused the Benghazi attack in 2012.

[Ban Hammer 13,622]

[ready4ONE 5,400]

15 hours ago, jg121783 said:

 

I knew the NY times puts out fake news but I wasn't aware they publish photoshopped images. First your excuse was the Republicans made the seating arrangements then the image was photoshopped.  What next?

I made no excuses, the OP failed to cite the source of the photo as most Rightwing websites' play extremely fast and loose, the NY Times actually cited the source of the photo. This tends to indicate the picture is legit, though it fails to show anyone around the Russian Ambassador spy actually interacting with him.

 

What I did do was offer a different theory of who may have invited the spy and decided where he sat. The innuendo in the OP was that the Democrats invited him and chose to sit with him. That is what needs to be proven first, as it remains the first theory put forward without a shred of proof.

[jg121783 3,921]

5 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

I made no excuses, the OP failed to cite the source of the photo as most Rightwing websites' play extremely fast and loose, the NY Times actually cited the source of the photo. This tends to indicate the picture is legit, though it fails to show anyone around the Russian Ambassador spy actually interacting with him.

 

What I did do was offer a different theory of who may have invited the spy and decided where he sat. The innuendo in the OP was that the Democrats invited him and chose to sit with him. That is what needs to be proven first, as it remains the first theory put forward without a shred of proof.

You said the photo was photoshopped.  You were proven wrong. Simple as that.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

You said the photo was photoshopped.  You were proven wrong. Simple as that.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

3 hours ago, jg121783 said:

You said the photo was photoshopped.  You were proven wrong. Simple as that.

It looked photoshopped. Yes I thought that it did. Is this the proof Democrats invited him and chose where he sat?

[Ban Hammer 13,622]

[CaliCat 3,957]

On 3/6/2017 at 9:36 PM, ready4ONE said:

It looked photoshopped. Yes I thought that it did. Is this the proof Democrats invited him and chose where he sat?

In an alternative fact reality, the photo is real, as are the voices inside the so-called president's head telling him Obama tapped his phones.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

On ‎3‎/‎6‎/‎2017 at 2:50 PM, jg121783 said:

You said the photo was photoshopped.  You were proven wrong. Simple as that.

I did. I appear to have been wrong. So freaking what? Does that prove the original allegation/insinuation? No.

 

On to the original fact free insinuation that the Democrats invited him and chose where he sat. Can you please bring on the proof? No?