Jump to content

109 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Yes and he also talked to 25 other ambassadors as part of his Senate duties. Pffft.  More Dems tilting at windmills instead of trying to make America better. 

 

All they know is division. It is their only game plan 

It's not about who he talked to, it's about how he responded when asked who he talked to.

 

He was asked about Russia. He said no. Either his memory is poor or he knowingly lied under oath. He could have easily said "I spoke to the Russian ambassador as part of my current duties in the Senate" or something like that.

Posted
4 minutes ago, bcking said:

It's not about who he talked to, it's about how he responded when asked who he talked to.

 

He was asked about Russia. He said no. Either his memory is poor or he knowingly lied under oath. He could have easily said "I spoke to the Russian ambassador as part of my current duties in the Senate" or something like that.

especially since he knew the question was going to be asked. thought went into his reply.

Posted
4 minutes ago, bcking said:

It's not about who he talked to, it's about how he responded when asked who he talked to.

 

He was asked about Russia. He said no. Either his memory is poor or he knowingly lied under oath. He could have easily said "I spoke to the Russian ambassador as part of my current duties in the Senate" or something like that.

He was asked if he had communications with the Russians as a campaign  surrogate or was aware if anyone else did. He said no. 

 

A US senator spoke to an ambassador, among the other 25 he spoke to. Hardly a smoking gun. but hey, the dems trying anything.

 

 

Posted

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.

SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
He actually did not say that "as a campaign surrogate" he did not have communications. He made two statements
1. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign (acknowledging that he would be considered a surrogate)
AND
2. I did not have communications with Russia
In fact you could argue his first statement is phrased in such a way that he doesn't even admit he was a surrogate. He merely states he has been called one. If he doesn't consider himself a surrogate, then how could the statement "I did not have communications with the Russians" only be applied to situations where he was a surrogate? 
Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
10 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Another Russian agent uncovered by the left. Give yourselves a pat on the back for a job well done lefties. I talked to a Russian guy a few years ago so maybe I am a Russian agent and don't even know it.

 

The articles don't indicate Jeff Sessions as a possible agent. The story is about contact between Sessions and Russian officials, about which he lied during his conformation hearings.  Maybe he didn't lie. He just presented the senate with alternative truths.

Posted
6 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

The articles don't indicate Jeff Sessions as a possible agent. The story is about contact between Sessions and Russian officials, about which he lied during his conformation hearings.  Maybe he didn't lie. He just presented the senate with alternative truths.

saying he was not aware of any campaign surrogates having contact with the ruskies is not a lie

 

Saying I had no classified intel on my personal computer is a lie

 

Saying I did not have sex with that women is a lie

 

 

 

Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
13 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

Greatest so called President, surrounding himself with only the best people for his Cabinet, really the biglyest best. I am sure Sessions simply mispoke, and now the fake and real news are on the attack. One day after the greatest speech since Gettysburg too. So unfair. So sad.

The so-called president is surrounding himself with crooks.

 

When he said he was going to drain the swamp, he forgot to mention he was going to fill it back up again.

Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

saying he was not aware of any campaign surrogates having contact with the ruskies is not a lie

 

Saying I had no classified intel on my personal computer is a lie

 

Saying I did not have sex with that women is a lie

 

 

 

 

Sessions lied, and his party should hold him accountable as they did the Clintons. 

Edited by CaliCat
Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
6 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Oh the outrage.  The Chairman of the Senate Foreign Intelligence Committee met with a foreign ambassador.  What is the world coming to! 

 

That is the puzzling part. If his contact was part of his job, why lie to the American people? Maybe his contact with the Russian ambassador was not as innocent as we would like to think. The lies should be enough for the so-called president to ask for his resignation, if Sessions doesn't have the moral capital to resign.

 

 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

saying he was not aware of any campaign surrogates having contact with the ruskies is not a lie

 

Saying I had no classified intel on my personal computer is a lie

 

Saying I did not have sex with that women is a lie

 

 

 

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.

SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
As for other surrogates, all he said was he was "not aware". As for himself, he said that other people have called him a surrogate (but he did not confirm whether he considers himself one), and then proceeds to say that he did not have communications with the Russians.
He provides no caveats. he does not say "I did not communicate with them as a surrogate". He flatly denied communication with them.
As you have said in other threads, anything that is "misleading" is fake, and therefore this is fake (lie).
Posted

A birdy of some rumor tells me he's going to recuse himself in order to save his hide the rest of his press conference will be dancing around ''the meaning of is, is''.

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...