Major Snowflake meltdown in Berkeley

[OriZ 3,157]

4 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Knock off the bickering immediately and permanently, in this and other threads.  You two know who you are.

Done deal dude! You can have the hourglass back now.

[smilesammich 10,727]

milo has opinions that, i believe, are manufactured to create agitation = $ for milo. i'm not sure why any of you think there wouldn't be protest at a university for a speaker who believes things like we should have a 5-10% cap on women in STEM fields. and like i said previously, a person is in bad condition after being shot by a 'free speech defender' at a milo 'talk' a week ago. why was milo's speech at berkley not cancelled prior due to increased tension? there are protests when milo speaks, that's a given and university admins should be aware  black bloc/anarchists are strengthening their efforts, due to the rise in alt-right (ie racist/discriminatory) acceptance. milo makes his money off of the drama, he stokes it.

[OriZ 3,157]

6 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

milo has opinions that, i believe, are manufactured to create agitation = $ for milo. i'm not sure why any of you think there wouldn't be protest at a university for a speaker who believes things like we should have a 5-10% cap on women in STEM fields. and like i said previously, a person is in bad condition after being shot by a 'free speech defender' at a milo 'talk' a week ago. why was milo's speech at berkley not cancelled prior due to increased tension? there are protests when milo speaks, that's a given and university admins should be aware  black bloc/anarchists are strengthening their efforts, due to the rise in alt-right (ie racist/discriminatory) acceptance. milo makes his money off of the drama, he stokes it.

His rights are still constitutionally protected, he is just the recent example though....and Berkley especially is notorious for this type of behavior. Can't imagine what kind of lame "product" is going to come out of that place in the next couple decades.

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, OriZ said:

His rights are still constitutionally protected, he is just the recent example though....and Berkley especially is notorious for this type of behavior. Can't imagine what kind of lame "product" is going to come out of that place in the next couple decades.

his rights werent infringed. the people who were be up had their rights infringed. imo, you support someone who believes the majority of rape reports are lies, girls just regretting a sexual encounter, expect people to hate you. milo is trash, he should stick to writing so he can safely speak to his target audience.

[Dashinka 24,978]

8 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

milo has opinions that, i believe, are manufactured to create agitation = $ for milo. i'm not sure why any of you think there wouldn't be protest at a university for a speaker who believes things like we should have a 5-10% cap on women in STEM fields. and like i said previously, a person is in bad condition after being shot by a 'free speech defender' at a milo 'talk' a week ago. why was milo's speech at berkley not cancelled prior due to increased tension? there are protests when milo speaks, that's a given and university admins should be aware  black bloc/anarchists are strengthening their efforts, due to the rise in alt-right (ie racist/discriminatory) acceptance. milo makes his money off of the drama, he stokes it.

Don't many of the far left spokespeople do the same thing (i.e. espouse their political views for the almighty dollar)?

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

Don't many of the far left spokespeople do the same thing (i.e. espouse their political views for the almighty dollar)?

are you saying that limiting women in math and science fields (because these fields are too stressful/hard for girls) is a part of the rw agenda? 

of course, lots of money on speaking tours..much more $ on a controversial speaking tour. do far leftists go to conservative christian "colleges" or anywhere theyre not at all wanted to speak?

[Dakine10 5,452]

52 minutes ago, OriZ said:

 

Well I definitely didn't think he should get beat up. Nor do I think "busting heads" is a solution to anything. The unwillingness to talk and listen to the other side is on both sides in many ways, but I can't say I recall hearing about as many alt. left speeches canceled due to violence in recent years as I have alt right. I have an issue with that.

  I don't recall hearing about an alt. left. Perhaps that's why.

 

  Anyway, I don't condone the violence. I don't think you have to tolerate a messenger of intolerance, but you can't react with something worse either, which is what happens when protestors resort to violence.   

Edited February 2, 2017 by Dakine10

[Teddy B 17,252]

9 hours ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Stalin would be proud

ever notice its the people who demand freedom of expression and speech that go haywire when a dissenting opinion is heard  

Although this does apply to both the left and the right at times, I do agree that the radical left has cornered the market on violent protests.

[smilesammich 10,727]

right now we're dealing with people who want to kill off groups of people they've determined to be undesirable, at the minimum suppress them into obscurity. i think it's important to remember - alt right wants to rid us of lives/people. antifa wants to rid us of poisonous rhetoric (which history has taught us, ultimately leads to genocide). the violence is only going to get worse, just depends upon who's going to catch the brunt of that violence. 

[verneforchat 139]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

Don't many of the far left spokespeople do the same thing (i.e. espouse their political views for the almighty dollar)?

I would say about half as many as the current right spokespeople.

[verneforchat 139]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

right now we're dealing with people who want to kill off groups of people they've determined to be undesirable, at the minimum suppress them into obscurity. i think it's important to remember - alt right wants to rid us of lives/people. antifa wants to rid us of poisonous rhetoric (which history has taught us, ultimately leads to genocide). the violence is only going to get worse, just depends upon who's going to catch the brunt of that violence. 

Lets not forget that this violent people have wanted to do this for a long time and are opportunists. They saw the large protest crowd and got their opportunity.

True cowards.

[Teddy B 17,252]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

right now we're dealing with people who want to kill off groups of people they've determined to be undesirable, at the minimum suppress them into obscurity. i think it's important to remember - alt right wants to rid us of lives/people. antifa wants to rid us of poisonous rhetoric (which history has taught us, ultimately leads to genocide). the violence is only going to get worse, just depends upon who's going to catch the brunt of that violence. 

Who's this antifa chick you speak of?

[verneforchat 139]

30 minutes ago, Teddy B said:

Although this does apply to both the left and the right at times, I do agree that the radical left has cornered the market on violent protests.

Considering alt right shot someone at UW, and multiple people have been doxxed by alt+right groups;  I think that honor still remains with the radical right.

[Teddy B 17,252]

1 minute ago, verneforchat said:

Considering alt right shot someone at UW, and multiple people have been doxxed by alt+right groups;  I think that honor still remains with the radical right.

Revealing someone's personal information on the internet does not equate to a violent protest. As I said both sides have their moments, but the radical left are most responsible for any recent violent protests. Aside from the Clive Bundy group, I don't recall a recent radical right protest that turned to violence, there may have been but I just don't remember any. Meanwhile there have been countless violent protests by the folks on the far left.

[verneforchat 139]

2 minutes ago, Teddy B said:

Revealing someone's personal information on the internet does not equate to a violent protest. As I said both sides have their moments, but the radical left are most responsible for any recent violent protests. Aside from the Clive Bundy group, I don't recall a recent radical right protest that turned to violence, there may have been but I just don't remember any. Meanwhile there have been countless violent protests by the folks on the far left.

Doxxing someone is far more dangerous than you assume.

Let me jog your memory from last week where a radical right shot a protester. 

Just because you dont choose to read it does not mean it did not happen. 

 

There has been more violent meltdowns from the snowflake radical rights. 

Edited February 2, 2017 by verneforchat