Women's march biggest protest in US history

[OriZ 3,157]

3 minutes ago, Dakine10 said:

 

    Don't forget Oriz, you don't generalize.

 

For a change you are correct, I don't.

Edited January 23, 2017 by OriZ

[Dakine10 5,452]

10 minutes ago, OriZ said:

 

For a change you are correct, I don't.

  Good, glad you clarified. For others who might generalize, avoiding the plural use of you (ie. you guys, you people) is a good way to avoid an inadvertent generalization. Of course you probably already know that since you don't generalize.

[Ban Hammer 13,335]

3 hours ago, Unidentified said:

 

Problem with that is that she's taking about the current rights of guns and not what should happen to guns. 

 

And what socialist countries has banned guns?

  guns don't have rights........

[Unidentified 2,930]

2 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

  guns don't have rights........

Wow you're so funny... And guns are not what this thread is about. 

Edited January 23, 2017 by Unidentified

[Unidentified 2,930]

38 minutes ago, OriZ said:

 

Wasn't my photo, and I handle a strong woman daily.

 

What I don't particularly approve of are lunatics.

 

Then why call women nasty? 

 

I don't approve of lunatics either. That's why I marched in DC yesterday. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

8 minutes ago, Dakine10 said:

  Everyone generalizes. There's nothing inherently bad about generalizing, unless you're doing it in an inappropriately negative or derogatory way to begin with. Generalization about a group based on a few individuals is an example of faulty generalization. It is the logical fallacy known as defective induction. Even in that case, most human beings still do it from time to time, as we are not infallible. I have never seen or met anyone who doesn't, regardless of what they claim.

That was well thought out, cordial, rational , logical, intelligent and inclusive.  You are reported. 

[OriZ 3,157]

20 minutes ago, Unidentified said:

 

Then why call women nasty? 

 

I don't approve of lunatics either. That's why I marched in DC yesterday. 

 

I wasn't calling all women nasty. I was calling a particular behavior by a particular group of people nasty because that's what it is and I tend to call it as I see it.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Seems to be a lot of snowflakes crying because the Women's March was huge and successful but 'the greatest man to be elected President since Reagan, and he is bigly cooler' had a tiny crowd (to match his tiny hands and minuscule popularity numbers) for his huuge gala coronation. Sad.

[Dashinka 24,494]

16 hours ago, Unidentified said:

 

You found a speech about women's rights and love tasteless? 

I finally listened to Ashley Judd's speech.  It didn't seem to me to be based on love.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

36 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I finally listened to Ashley Judd's speech.  It didn't seem to me to be based on love.

I swear she was tripping on something. No one is that bombed out of thier brain without help 

[OriZ 3,157]

44 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I finally listened to Ashley Judd's speech.  It didn't seem to me to be based on love.

 

Hey now, love trumps hate.

[Unidentified 2,930]

4 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

I swear she was tripping on something. No one is that bombed out of thier brain without help 

 

43 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I finally listened to Ashley Judd's speech.  It didn't seem to me to be based on love.

She read the most awesome poem by a 19 year old. It's based on the true state of this country with growing racism/nazism, **-/transphobia etc.

 

[Penguin_ie 5,993]

****** Locked for review *******