Trump Destroyed CNN reporter

[smilesammich 10,727]

7 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

That is how it works now, and it shows that there really is no unbiased media outlets anymore.  The media on one side will say something and leave out some facts, and the media that favors the other side will refute (fact check) them.  So that is the basis for saying it is possible for all outlets to distribute fake or incomplete news.  CNN, NYT, WaPo, ABC, NBC, CBS do not have any more credibility than FNC or Briebart now.

yes, we have to 'fact check' our media and sources. but that in no way means all sources are equal in credibility or lack thereof.

[bcking 3,157]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

That is how it works now, and it shows that there really is no unbiased media outlets anymore.  The media on one side will say something and leave out some facts, and the media that favors the other side will refute (fact check) them.  So that is the basis for saying it is possible for all outlets to distribute fake or incomplete news.  CNN, NYT, WaPo, ABC, NBC, CBS do not have any more credibility than FNC or Briebart now.

I agree with smile,

 

Just saying that all of the new outlets are CAPABLE of reporting "biased news", or even saying that they all do, does not mean they all do to the same degree. When fact checking websites you can look at how often they are "paints on fire" lying their bum off. I would trust a website that does that 10% of the time far more than one that does it 80% of the time.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

If you would all get your news from Chest and Facebook, like me , you would not have issues 

[bcking 3,157]

18 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

If you would all get your news from Chest and Facebook, like me , you would not have issues 

Breaking News: Trump is engaged to Putin and he is pregnant with their love child.

 

No need to confirm anywhere else. You heard it here

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

5 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

That is how it works now, and it shows that there really is no unbiased media outlets anymore.  The media on one side will say something and leave out some facts, and the media that favors the other side will refute (fact check) them.  So that is the basis for saying it is possible for all outlets to distribute fake or incomplete news.  CNN, NYT, WaPo, ABC, NBC, CBS do not have any more credibility than FNC or Briebart now.

I disagree, Breitbart should not even be mentioned in the same sentence, Breitbart is a joke or more like an evil clown. If you think the others have no more credibility

 you are not watching them or just don't understand the issues.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

1 hour ago, bcking said:

Breaking News: Trump is engaged to Putin and he is pregnant with their love child.

 

No need to confirm anywhere else. You heard it here

 

They will name him Donpin, Pudald the Great.

[Dashinka 24,505]

17 hours ago, Ebunoluwa said:

I disagree, Breitbart should not even be mentioned in the same sentence, Breitbart is a joke or more like an evil clown. If you think the others have no more credibility

 you are not watching them or just don't understand the issues.

So it's OK to spoon feed debate questions to a major political candidate, or to participate in a media control dinner at the house of one party's campaign chair?  I am not defending Breitbart, and to be honest rarely ever go there, but to say the mainstream media has any credibility is disingenuous. 

[Dashinka 24,505]

23 hours ago, smilesammich said:

yes, we have to 'fact check' our media and sources. but that in no way means all sources are equal in credibility or lack thereof.

I agree, they all equally lack credibility. 

[Dakine10 5,452]

31 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I agree, they all equally lack credibility. 

   What do you agree with? She said they are not equal in credibility. Comparing Breitbart to CNN is just silly.

[Transborderwife 4,666]

20 hours ago, bcking said:

Breaking News: Trump is engaged to Putin and he is pregnant with their love child.

 

No need to confirm anywhere else. You heard it here

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

So it's OK to spoon feed debate questions to a major political candidate, or to participate in a media control dinner at the house of one party's campaign chair?  I am not defending Breitbart, and to be honest rarely ever go there, but to say the mainstream media has any credibility is disingenuous. 

why does it matter in the slightest if either candidate was "spoonfed" debate questions if the candidates are not required to give an actual answer - with substance? and if the major political candidates aren't held accountable for their answers, why even bother having a debate? 

[Dashinka 24,505]

1 hour ago, Dakine10 said:

   What do you agree with? She said they are not equal in credibility. Comparing Breitbart to CNN is just silly.

Did Breibart pass questions on to a major presidential candidate?  Did Breibart send any of their journalists to Podesta's dinner?  Again, I don't read Breibart, but the fact that a CNN employee did, and many mainstream Leftist journalists did, puts those organization in the "lacks credibility" category and even on par with an organization like Breibart.  It is amazing that all the news media that are clearly biased to the Left are considered credible, but any organization that doesn't favor the Left is not credible. 

[Dashinka 24,505]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

why does it matter in the slightest if either candidate was "spoonfed" debate questions if the candidates are not required to give an actual answer - with substance? and if the major political candidates aren't held accountable for their answers, why even bother having a debate? 

Then why give Hillary the questions at all?  If she isn't going to answer them properly, she doesn't need them.  The fact that it was only one candidate that got the questions from a Left leaning news organization (CNN), makes that organization look corrupt from their main mission, to communicate unbiased information.

Edited January 20, 2017 by Bill & Katya

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

Then why give Hillary the questions at all?  If she isn't going to answer them properly, she doesn't need them. 

i don't think i've ever heard trump respond to a question -debate or not- and give even an attempt at a direct answer. the answers/statements/details he does give, almost half of the time are full on lies. cnn isn't broadcasting this from the mountain tops 24/7 so, i don't consider them liberal. they're getting in line.

oh and hillary lost, time to get over it.

[Dakine10 5,452]

10 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Did Breibart pass questions on to a major presidential candidate?  Did Breibart send any of their journalists to Podesta's dinner?  Again, I don't read Breibart, but the fact that a CNN employee did, and many mainstream Leftist journalists did, puts those organization in the "lacks credibility" category and even on par with an organization like Breibart.  It is amazing that all the news media that are clearly biased to the Left are considered credible, but any organization that doesn't favor the Left is not credible. 

   Are you serious?  The executive chairman of Breitbart became the executive chairman of Trump's campaign while still remaining associated with Breitbart. That is clear bias.  Credibility and bias are two different things though. Most news organizations show bias. Bias doesn't mean they are not credible. IMO, a news organization that came into existence solely to promote the myth of a white nationalist utopia is both biased and lacks credibility. That is Breitbart.