Is it really now okay for former members who had their accounts closed administratively to rejoin?

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

Our International Playboy is quite obviously who he previously was. He really isn't even trying to hide his identity.

[Dakine10 5,452]

Our International Playboy is quite obviously who he previously was. He really isn't even trying to hide his identity.

The response from moderation to pointing this out is the head shaking emoticon. I'm not sure if this means "no we don't think this is who you think it is" or if it means "stop talking about it". At the same time Venkman/Fishguy (for example) and a few others were nuked almost immediately. I'm not sure what criteria administration uses to address this, but it is very inconsistent.

[Catuela 16]

VJ based in the US of A with the scensory of a strict Muslim country....

Has anyone seen hunger games??

Maybe VJ is similar where scenarios are being scripted as we read....

Edited December 20, 2016 by Catuela

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

Still waiting on a reply on this one.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

Cool, I'll take silence as consent on this one. I'll tell my buddy he'll be welcomed back with open arms and that he should start in CEHST.

[Penguin_ie 5,993]

I didn't think this needed a response, apparently it does-

if someone closes their account of their own accord, they may re-join with a new one. 

If someone gets banned, which only happens after many, many Warnings and suspensions (or to spammers), they may not re-join under a different name, unless they have gotten specific permission from Captain Ewok, as per our TOS.  This has happened once or twice, after a very long absence, but is extremely unusual. 

 

If you suspect someone is a dupe account/ re-reg, report it as you would any TOS violation, and give your reasons.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I can't figure out how to report a member on this new platform, so I will report a post. 

 

I checked with several other members to see that their recollection was also that this member had their account closed not at their own request. If we are wrong, I will of course drop this issue.