This is your sign

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

[smilesammich 10,727]

imagine how smart he'd be if he read books and stuff.

[bcking 3,157]

Nature Boy, seriously I like you and some of the things you say are clever and you have on a couple of occassions made me rethink things I've said.

However, posting stuff like this doesn't improve your image. First off, just using an "IQ" number to estimate someone's ability to do a certain job, or to hold a certain position is very weak. That just isn't what IQ testing is intended for. There are some incredibly high scoring people who would never be able to function as a head of state.

Now that is even assuming we are working with real IQ numbers, which in this case we are not. The modern IQ test has been around like 60 years, and your list includes many Presidents from long before its time. These are mostly estimated IQ scores, though some may be actual tests.

That brings us then to Donald. We have no documentation that he has ever taken an IQ test, and I'm not sure if he has ever admitted to one. The "156" number was produced by people estimating it based on his attendance at Wharton. However, he didn't get accepted to Wharton business school in the traditional way so you are then taking an estimate based on flawed assumptions.

Given his success it is likely his IQ falls in the top 5% (>125). That puts him in a group with about 15 million other people in America alone. Not all of those people are qualified to be President. Most aren't.

You need to stick to actually making well thought out points based on facts and discussion. Stop with the random images, memes, youtube videos and the like. Don't slide that far down in the ditch.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Nature Boy, seriously I like you and some of the things you say are clever and you have on a couple of occassions made me rethink things I've said.

However, posting stuff like this doesn't improve your image. First off, just using an "IQ" number to estimate someone's ability to do a certain job, or to hold a certain position is very weak. That just isn't what IQ testing is intended for. There are some incredibly high scoring people who would never be able to function as a head of state.

Now that is even assuming we are working with real IQ numbers, which in this case we are not. The modern IQ test has been around like 60 years, and your list includes many Presidents from long before its time. These are mostly estimated IQ scores, though some may be actual tests.

That brings us then to Donald. We have no documentation that he has ever taken an IQ test, and I'm not sure if he has ever admitted to one. The "156" number was produced by people estimating it based on his attendance at Wharton. However, he didn't get accepted to Wharton business school in the traditional way so you are then taking an estimate based on flawed assumptions.

Given his success it is likely his IQ falls in the top 5% (>125). That puts him in a group with about 15 million other people in America alone. Not all of those people are qualified to be President. Most aren't.

You need to stick to actually making well thought out points based on facts and discussion. Stop with the random images, memes, youtube videos and the like. Don't slide that far down in the ditch.

I summarized it was true cause of the mass amount of people, who attended his rallies

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Follow this link. Proof

Intel Institute: Trump’s IQ is 156, Hillary’s is tiny, Obama’s is the worst in history

http://prntly.com/2016/08/04/intel-institute-trumps-iq-is-156-hillarys-is-tiny-obamas-is-the-worst-in-history/

[OriZ 3,157]

Nature Boy, seriously I like you and some of the things you say are clever and you have on a couple of occassions made me rethink things I've said.

However, posting stuff like this doesn't improve your image. First off, just using an "IQ" number to estimate someone's ability to do a certain job, or to hold a certain position is very weak. That just isn't what IQ testing is intended for. There are some incredibly high scoring people who would never be able to function as a head of state.

Now that is even assuming we are working with real IQ numbers, which in this case we are not. The modern IQ test has been around like 60 years, and your list includes many Presidents from long before its time. These are mostly estimated IQ scores, though some may be actual tests.

That brings us then to Donald. We have no documentation that he has ever taken an IQ test, and I'm not sure if he has ever admitted to one. The "156" number was produced by people estimating it based on his attendance at Wharton. However, he didn't get accepted to Wharton business school in the traditional way so you are then taking an estimate based on flawed assumptions.

Given his success it is likely his IQ falls in the top 5% (>125). That puts him in a group with about 15 million other people in America alone. Not all of those people are qualified to be President. Most aren't.

You need to stick to actually making well thought out points based on facts and discussion. Stop with the random images, memes, youtube videos and the like. Don't slide that far down in the ditch.

That is true, I heard about that 156 IQ thing many months ago, and looked into it....it's not like he ever went and did the test and gave someone the numbers, it's all estimates based on different things. I would go out on a limb and guess it's probably not very accurate.

[Dakine10 5,452]

Follow this link. Proof

Intel Institute: Trump’s IQ is 156, Hillary’s is tiny, Obama’s is the worst in history

http://prntly.com/2016/08/04/intel-institute-trumps-iq-is-156-hillarys-is-tiny-obamas-is-the-worst-in-history/

Intelligence professors, huh? I bet they have the bigliest IQ's of all.