Jill Stein a Clinton pawn?

[OriZ 3,157]

Honestly, just watching Stein talk annoys me. I don't understand those who voted for her although I do know a few.

[eieio 1,594]

Not sure how to validate this evidence?

Jill Stein raised enough money for a recount in 3 states (WI, MI, PA) that Donald Trump won -- in less than 24 hours! Who's giving her all the money? No one knows. Some say it could be George Soros working in the background. One very suspicious activity users on Reddit.com noticed is the frequency of the deposit. About $160,000 is being added to Stein's recount effort every where -- like clockwork. JIM STONE writes: Nov 23-24 2016 JILL STEIN’S ELECTION RECOUNT IS BEING PAID FOR BY A BOT! A bot is pulling cash from a central fund, and giving it out at a pre determined rate. Go to Jill Stein’s fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a PERFECTLY CONSISTENT 160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully, and noted that at night, when everyone is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, her donations for this came in like clockwork, with no deviation from the steady pace whatsoever. The only way that can happen is if a bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple people, and whoever set it up did not consider the fact that practically everything would come from America, and practically everyone is asleep at 3AM. LAST NIGHT IT SHOULD HAVE SLOWED DOWN. IT DID NOT. IT JUST MARCHED RIGHT TOWARD THE FINISH LIKE AN OBEDIENT SOLDIER. It went straight to 2.65 million by six AM. I can calculate: IT WILL GO TO 4.5 MILLION IN 28.125 HOURS. Oh, a few people will pitch in for real, so I’ll say 27 hours. EASY MATH. JILL STEIN WILL GET THE 4.5 MILLION SHE NEEDS BETWEEN 4 AND SIX PM TONIGHT, DEPENDING UPON HOW MUCH REAL PEOPLE PITCH IN. Actual math progression based on the steady rate lands squarely on 6:10 PM tonight, but I am guessing a few real people will pay in. Don’t be fooled by the slick language on the donation page, if those donations did not virtually stop at night they are not coming from the American people. Yes folks, we are watching the election steal as it happens. They could not do it by threatening electors, so now we have this. And it is all based on false claims, because Michigan CANNOT BE HACKED. Michigan has a CERTIFIED VOTE. There is NO WAY THIS IS LEGIT. And that means ONE THING – there are liars doing it, powerful liars who know in advance they are going to find what they are looking for. Anonymous sent:

[ready4ONE 5,400]

If this is so convincingly an attempt to steal the election, why post a source choosing to be anonymous? Perhaps the stealing has already been done and the culprits fear exposure?

[eieio 1,594]

If this is so convincingly an attempt to steal the election, why post a source choosing to be anonymous? Perhaps the stealing has already been done and the culprits fear exposure?

I could not post the whole article because…….i was not allowed to do so. Picture issues. I will try to add what I can.

[eieio 1,594]

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=50879

[Dashinka 24,954]

So now the Hillary campaign is getting involved. I guess the lawyers will be getting a payday.

WASHINGTONRepresentatives from Hillary Clintons presidential campaign plan to participate in the effort to recount ballots in three states that provided Republican Donald Trump his margin of victory, an attorney for the Democratic presidential candidate said.

In a blog entry posted on Saturday, the general counsel for Mrs. Clintons presidential campaign, Marc Elias, said that it was important for the campaign to be represented in any legal proceedings and public monitoring stemming from recount efforts launched by Green Party candidate Jill Stein.

Now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides, Mr. Elias wrote, adding that the campaign would also participate in planned recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan if they move forward.

We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states Michigan well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount. But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself, Mr. Elias wrote.

Ms. Stein, the Green Partys nominee for president, announced this week that she would be pushing for statewide recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, citing the work of a prominent computer scientist who suggested a theoretical way that vote tallies could have been hacked or manipulated.

No evidence of such tampering has been found so far, but a recount of paper ballots and forensic audit of electronic voting machines could put to rest concerns about irregularities and tampering, the Stein campaign argues.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-campaign-to-participate-in-recount-sought-by-green-partys-stein-1480179181

[millefleur 5,047]

While Stein's funds may be coming from a more "insider" source, it's not really that surprising in this day and age. Raising money is relatively easy and doable because of the Internet. I could understand why counting all the votes would be important, just to make everyone feel that their voice was heard (even if it won't change the outcome), but making a big deal about it as if it would change the results seems a bit too much.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

So now the Hillary campaign is getting involved. I guess the lawyers will be getting a payday.

WASHINGTONRepresentatives from Hillary Clintons presidential campaign plan to participate in the effort to recount ballots in three states that provided Republican Donald Trump his margin of victory, an attorney for the Democratic presidential candidate said.

In a blog entry posted on Saturday, the general counsel for Mrs. Clintons presidential campaign, Marc Elias, said that it was important for the campaign to be represented in any legal proceedings and public monitoring stemming from recount efforts launched by Green Party candidate Jill Stein.

Now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides, Mr. Elias wrote, adding that the campaign would also participate in planned recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan if they move forward.

We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states Michigan well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount. But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself, Mr. Elias wrote.

Ms. Stein, the Green Partys nominee for president, announced this week that she would be pushing for statewide recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, citing the work of a prominent computer scientist who suggested a theoretical way that vote tallies could have been hacked or manipulated.

No evidence of such tampering has been found so far, but a recount of paper ballots and forensic audit of electronic voting machines could put to rest concerns about irregularities and tampering, the Stein campaign argues.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-campaign-to-participate-in-recount-sought-by-green-partys-stein-1480179181

So they are doing the same thing , they roasted Trump for because they thought he might do it.

Lib logic and hypocrisy are like peas and carrots

[Dashinka 24,954]

While Stein's funds may be coming from a more "insider" source, it's not really that surprising in this day and age. Raising money is relatively easy and doable because of the Internet. I could understand why counting all the votes would be important, just to make everyone feel that their voice was heard (even if it won't change the outcome), but making a big deal about it as if it would change the results seems a bit too much.

Then why not soak Soros, or the DNC for a complete nationwide recount? Why only focus on the close states that went for Trump, and not the close states that went for Hillary? If this was some altruistic concern by Stein to make sure every vote was counted then why the focus on those three states? I am all for making sure all the voter's votes are counted, I am also for verifying that no one not allowed to vote is verified as well. So let's stop the hipocrisy and recount the entire country and let Stein's contributors pay for it.

[millefleur 5,047]

Then why not soak Soros, or the DNC for a complete nationwide recount? Why only focus on the close states that went for Trump, and not the close states that went for Hillary? If this was some altruistic concern by Stein to make sure every vote was counted then why the focus on those three states? I am all for making sure all the voter's votes are counted, I am also for verifying that no one not allowed to vote is verified as well. So let's stop the hipocrisy and recount the entire country and let Stein's contributors pay for it.

True, good point. Maybe the whole thing is just a PR grab by Stein.

[eieio 1,594]

Now Stein tweeted this.

[eieio 1,594]

Trump posted this.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1) You are correct. NB is generalizing because you lean left, and the leftinistas here say there is no such thing as voter fraud, at least not to an extent that makes any difference.

2) Don't let Teddy read this, or he will change the secret handshake and take away your shawl.

Two things:

1. I'm sure by now you know that I have never said anything of the sort

2. There are lots of different types of "fraud" (dead voters still coming, someone using another living persons name, machine tampering etc...). I'm specifically addressing the concern that I've seen some reports on about machine tampering, possibly even from an international source. That is the fraud that I think both parties should be afraid of.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Imagine how much good could be done for this country as a whole if folks like Jill Stein raised this much money on short notice and actually put it towards good things, like housing for the homeless, or improving our VA medical system.

[Dakine10 5,452]

So they are doing the same thing , they roasted Trump for because they thought he might do it.

Lib logic and hypocrisy are like peas and carrots

And Trump is criticizing them for doing the same thing he said he would do.

Conservative logic and hypocrisy are like peas and carrots.

Glad we agree.