Jump to content

215 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Honestly the more I think about it I have a bigger problem with the way the audience treated him. As people said, he deserves to have a night out with his children. Being in a large theatre surrounded by boo's would be, to me, closer to harassment (or mobbing) than one man on stage saying he is afraid and hopes things will turn out okay.

Posted

I already expressed my opinion on this: If the play was about American History and focused on a policiy that is now topical in today's world and Obama has previously publicly stood up against it (Say gun control, and Obama had explicitly said in the past that he wanted to "take away the guns" and the play was about say some event 200 years ago where people tried to take away our guns), I don't think it would be inappropriate for the cast to direct a message to the President as long as it is as polite as possible.

Again I thought the "speech" was pretty darn polite. The cast wasn't booing or heckling. It was one guy reading a 30 second blurb about love and acceptance. If someone read a similar blurb about love and acceptance and the right to bear arms while President Obama was in the audience I think it would be fine. I also can almost guarantee the President wouldn't complain about it later (Nor is Pence really complaining).

I personally don't care what the topic of the play is, I don't believe this is morally acceptable in any leisurely setting. I believe that the cast of the play crossed a moral line. We obviously disagree on where the moral line is drawn and that's fine. But my questions to you would be where and how do we draw the line of what topics are acceptable and what are not in a leisurely setting and who gets to make that decision?

Posted

You know the answer to that.

I just believe that when the work day is done, barring any emergencies, that politicians should be able to have a social life without being singled out the way Pence was.

Posted

I personally don't care what the topic of the play is, I don't believe this is morally acceptable in any leisurely setting. I believe that the cast of the play crossed a moral line. We obviously disagree on where the moral line is drawn and that's fine. But my questions to you would be where and how do we draw the line of what topics are acceptable and what are not in a leisurely setting and who gets to make that decision?

So I guess to that I would say any topic is acceptable as long as it falls within our laws of free speech. All of the comedy news TV shows have an audience when they are filming and they discuss far worse than what was discussed there. I understand that you think he was "blindsided" in a way because you feel it was unexpected at a play. My point was I just felt it wasn't all that unexpected given the topic of the play. I've seen plays that are far more topical than Hamiltion, and get far more politically involved. Some work it into the actual production (alter the lines to fit current events). Some people enjoy it, some people don't.

Bottom line the production company can decide what they feel comfortable doing, and then the audience can decide if they do or don't mind. If people are that offended by Hamilton they can stop buying tickets. You don't have to go to that particular play. There are plenty of other plays that likely wouldn't do a similar thing.

They didn't refuse to perform for him.

They didn't harass him (you could argue that the audience did, but the cast did not).

They decided to use likely the only time they will be in the same room as him, and their "power" as performers to promote something they believe strongly in. He can choose to withhold his business in the future as everyone else can if they are offended.

Posted

So I guess to that I would say any topic is acceptable as long as it falls within our laws of free speech. All of the comedy news TV shows have an audience when they are filming and they discuss far worse than what was discussed there. I understand that you think he was "blindsided" in a way because you feel it was unexpected at a play. My point was I just felt it wasn't all that unexpected given the topic of the play. I've seen plays that are far more topical than Hamiltion, and get far more politically involved. Some work it into the actual production (alter the lines to fit current events). Some people enjoy it, some people don't.

Bottom line the production company can decide what they feel comfortable doing, and then the audience can decide if they do or don't mind. If people are that offended by Hamilton they can stop buying tickets. You don't have to go to that particular play. There are plenty of other plays that likely wouldn't do a similar thing.

They didn't refuse to perform for him.

They didn't harass him (you could argue that the audience did, but the cast did not).

They decided to use likely the only time they will be in the same room as him, and their "power" as performers to promote something they believe strongly in. He can choose to withhold his business in the future as everyone else can if they are offended.

So long it is projected as free speech ?

So the mayor of some Hicksville town that had to step down because she said Chelly resembles and ape or words to that effect.

Then you think she should not have had to step down obviously!

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted

Boohoo

Mike Pence's family suffers some jeers while his policies and efforts rip families apart and create a lower class of citizenry.

Click the "Spoiler" button to see our full timeline.

I-129F Sent : 2016-02-13

I-129F NOA1 : 2016-02-19

I-129F NOA2 : 2016-04-18

I-129F NOA2 (printed) : 2016-04-22

NBI, CENOMAR, Birth Certificates, Passport Complete: 2016-05-02

NVC Acknowledged Case: 2016-05-06

NVC Assigned Case Number: 2016-05-09

CFO Certificate: 2016-05-12

Medical Complete: 2016-05-17

Interview Passed: 2016-05-23

CEAC Status "Administrative Processing": 2016-05-23

CEAC Status "Issued": 2016-05-24

2GO in transit: 2016-05-26

Visa in hand: 2016-05-27 (Manila)

POE: 2016-05-29

Married: 2016-07-16

AOS Sent: 2016-08-24

NOA Email: 2016-08-31
Biometrics: 2016-09-29
EAD Status "New Card is being produced" : 2016-11-02
AP Status "Case was approved" : 2016-11-02
EAD Status "Card is has been delivered to me by USPS" : 2016-11-18 (Status never said "mailed")
I-485 Status "New Card is being produced":2016-11-22

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted

So long it is projected as free speech ?

So the mayor of some Hicksville town that had to step down because she said Chelly resembles and ape or words to that effect.

Then you think she should not have had to step down obviously!

Nice straw man.

Click the "Spoiler" button to see our full timeline.

I-129F Sent : 2016-02-13

I-129F NOA1 : 2016-02-19

I-129F NOA2 : 2016-04-18

I-129F NOA2 (printed) : 2016-04-22

NBI, CENOMAR, Birth Certificates, Passport Complete: 2016-05-02

NVC Acknowledged Case: 2016-05-06

NVC Assigned Case Number: 2016-05-09

CFO Certificate: 2016-05-12

Medical Complete: 2016-05-17

Interview Passed: 2016-05-23

CEAC Status "Administrative Processing": 2016-05-23

CEAC Status "Issued": 2016-05-24

2GO in transit: 2016-05-26

Visa in hand: 2016-05-27 (Manila)

POE: 2016-05-29

Married: 2016-07-16

AOS Sent: 2016-08-24

NOA Email: 2016-08-31
Biometrics: 2016-09-29
EAD Status "New Card is being produced" : 2016-11-02
AP Status "Case was approved" : 2016-11-02
EAD Status "Card is has been delivered to me by USPS" : 2016-11-18 (Status never said "mailed")
I-485 Status "New Card is being produced":2016-11-22

Posted

So I guess to that I would say any topic is acceptable as long as it falls within our laws of free speech. All of the comedy news TV shows have an audience when they are filming and they discuss far worse than what was discussed there. I understand that you think he was "blindsided" in a way because you feel it was unexpected at a play. My point was I just felt it wasn't all that unexpected given the topic of the play. I've seen plays that are far more topical than Hamiltion, and get far more politically involved. Some work it into the actual production (alter the lines to fit current events). Some people enjoy it, some people don't.

Bottom line the production company can decide what they feel comfortable doing, and then the audience can decide if they do or don't mind. If people are that offended by Hamilton they can stop buying tickets. You don't have to go to that particular play. There are plenty of other plays that likely wouldn't do a similar thing.

They didn't refuse to perform for him.

They didn't harass him (you could argue that the audience did, but the cast did not).

They decided to use likely the only time they will be in the same room as him, and their "power" as performers to promote something they believe strongly in. He can choose to withhold his business in the future as everyone else can if they are offended.

I have a feeling there would be many fights and riots incited if people performing in a show were to feel free to talk about their political beliefs. What if it were the Ice Capades or the Circus where many children were present. Would it be okay for an anti-abortion performer to go into a rant about killing babies?

I'm not saying that anyone was offended by the cast of Hamilton, I certainly wasn't and neither was Mike Pence. My issue is with the morality of it.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I'll ask you the same question: Would this be okay if President Obama was attending a play with his wife and daughters for a member of the cast to call him out publicly in front of everyone for his policies?

so if we acquiesce to the claim that they audience should feels like they are in a sanctuary and safe place, can we revisit what Donald Trump has said about folks outside of the theater?

The Wall Street Journal editorial board
OPINION PAGES OF THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Nicolle Wallace
FORMER CO-HOST, “THE VIEW”
Mort Zuckerman
OWNER, THE NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Mitt Romney
FORMER MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNOR
Rick Scott
FLORIDA GOVERNOR
Democratic presidential candidates
European leaders
Islamic State
TERRORIST GROUP
Republican Party
POLITICAL PARTY
Other Republican candidates
“Super PACs”
POLITICAL FUND-RAISING COMMITTEES
Washington insiders
President Obama
Hillary Clinton
DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Posted

So long it is projected as free speech ?

So the mayor of some Hicksville town that had to step down because she said Chelly resembles and ape or words to that effect.

Then you think she should not have had to step down obviously!

Well a mayor is a publicly elected official, not an artist on a stage so it is a little difference. You can easily avoid the political views of the cast of Hamilton - Don't see their musical. If they offend enough people they will lose business. Just like the comedy news shows on television. As long as they have viewers they will continue to do what they do because it is working for them.

For the Mayor, there was nothing legally stating she had to step down. I think given her public position in government it was appropriate to do so, but there isn't some "rulebook" for Mayors she violated.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Jeb Bush
FORMER FLORIDA GOVERNOR
Chris Christie
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Megyn Kelly
ANCHOR, FOX NEWS
John King
CHIEF NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT, CNN
Charles Lane
OPINION WRITER, THE WASHINGTON POST
Meghan McCain
HOST, “AMERICA NOW,” AND FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR
Joe McQuaid
PUBLISHER, NEW HAMPSHIRE UNION LEADER
Clare O'Connor
STAFF WRITER, FORBES
Steve Rattner
WALL STREET EXECUTIVE AND NEW YORK TIMES CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Cokie Roberts
CONTRIBUTOR, “MORNING EDITION”
Jennifer Rubin
BLOGGER, THE WASHINGTON POST
Molly Sims
MODEL AND ACTRESS
Tavis Smiley
JOURNALIST, PBS

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Posted

I have a feeling there would be many fights and riots incited if people performing in a show were to feel free to talk about their political beliefs. What if it were the Ice Capades or the Circus where many children were present. Would it be okay for an anti-abortion performer to go into a rant about killing babies?

I'm not saying that anyone was offended by the cast of Hamilton, I certainly wasn't and neither was Mike Pence. My issue is with the morality of it.

I'm sure there are shows out there where the entire POINT of the show is someone talking about their political beliefs. Don't people like Bill Maher host entire shows of just them on stage?

It all depends on what the production is. I agree that at a Circus or Ice Capades it would be a little bit unexpected since it is completely off topic. I agree that at Hamilton it was also a little bit unexpected (but I would still argue not QUITE as off topic as if it was at the circus). Now that it has happened, now we know that Hamilton is the kind of show where they will express what they believe. People can choose to continue to go to it or not.

I can think of other musicals where I think it would have been similarly "unexpected" but also not all that bad.

There was a show called Spring Awakening that was on Broadway about 8 years ago. Spoiler alert but one of the main characters dies after her mother forces her to go to an underground "doctor" for an abortion. If the cast of that show decided to stand up at the end and make a statement about laws protecting safe places for women to obtain abortions I don't think it would be "Oh my god so crazy they did that!".

Plays as a form of art often times push mesages within the productions. Some do it more explicitly than others. I think Hamilton, without them making that speech, is already clearly against some of the policies that Pence believes in. I think just watching the show it is clear. THey decided to take it one step further and be very explicitly about their belief. That's there right as artists.

[Lots of links/Information]

I hope you are getting that list from somewhere else and not personally going through it all right now. The people who agree with you aren't going to click the links because we have seen all of it already. The people who don't agree with you won't change their mind because you make a list.

Just don't want you wasting time on this.

Posted

so if we acquiesce to the claim that they audience should feels like they are in a sanctuary and safe place, can we revisit what Donald Trump has said about folks outside of the theater?

You can revisit whatever you'd like. When a person attends a non political event as a leisurely spectator, (political figure or not) that person should have the expectancy and a right as a paying customer of not being made into the ringside show.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...