Jump to content

17 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

To distract ourselves from the clown car of halfwits currently being installed into positions of authority and influence in the Executive Branch, let's take a closer look at something that received only token attention during the election: Trump's "First 100 days" agenda. At the time, given his poor performance in the polls, it seemed like a cute attempt to play President for a day. In the new un-reality it deserves a closer look. Nothing here will strike you as strange or unfamiliar, I promise.

Trump's agenda is essentially the far-right part of the Republican Party's economic platform with a smattering of populist-centrist stuff thrown in to make Trump look "different" from the standard Old Republican White Guy. What will undoubtedly happen, now that Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan are in charge (nominally, in Ryan's case) of a chamber of Congress, is that all the folksy Populism will be a non-starter in the Capitol. The agenda will be shredded, and when the knives are put away we'll be left with – stop me if you've heard this before – big tax cuts, a partial Health Care Reform repeal (they lack the balls to get rid of the popular parts), and more big tax cuts.

The parts of the Trump agenda fall into three categories: blatantly unconstitutional, totally unrealistic, and standard GOP fare that any Republican suit would bring to the White House and has been since the 70s. Consider, for example, these populist proposals to clean up corruption:

* FIRST, propose a Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress;

* SECOND, a hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce federal workforce through attrition (exempting military, public safety, and public health);

* THIRD, a requirement that for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations must be eliminated;

* FOURTH, a 5 year-ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service;

* FIFTH, a lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government;

* SIXTH, a complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.

One: good luck passing an Amendment. Two is within the president's power for some Federal agencies. Three is unconstitutional on its face and looks like a middle school kid wrote it. Four and Five, blatantly unconstitutional. Six is redundant on existing FEC rules. I'm not cherry-picking here. This is how the entire thing unfolds.

"End offshoring" with "tariffs," spend massively to improve infrastructure…yeah, Mitch McConnell is definitely going to be cool with that. School vouchers? That drum has been banged for 15 years; where is the money going to come from? Building a wall? Unless it's a chain-link fence from Menard's, show me where the money is supposed to come from. Oh, right – those big tax cuts, including slashing the corporate tax rate by more than half, are gonna generate SO MUCH revenue that the lower rate will actually result in more tax dollars. Any of this sounding familiar? If you're the kind of person who "reads books" and stops believing in theories when they're "proven not to work" you may have noticed that Supply Side Economics has a rather…dismal track record. Yet, here we go again.

Attempts at restricting immigration in some draconian fashion, at which he only hints in his agenda, are likely to be the only substantive part of the agenda aside from the tax cuts that Congress is willing to touch. Even then, Congressional Republicans are likely to trim off a lot of the crazy in a cynical effort to win back some ground with Latino voters. Then again, they may go all-in with their new demagogue. Many of them, particularly in the House, are nihilistic enough to do it.

http://www.ginandtacos.com/2016/11/13/stop-me-if-youve-heard-this-one-before/

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Jimmy Kimmel does the Halloween episodes where they film kids who think all their candy is gone, and a Christmas one where they see the reaction to kids getting empty boxes. He really should consider getting one with Trump supporters around March or so. I want to see what that face looks like on adults.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Posted

Jimmy Kimmel does the Halloween episodes where they film kids who think all their candy is gone, and a Christmas one where they see the reaction to kids getting empty boxes. He really should consider getting one with Trump supporters around March or so. I want to see what that face looks like on adults.

maybe kimmel should cover all the post-campaign campaign rallies that trump would like to continue. will be entertaining, i'm sure.

Posted

I thought we were. Butt hurt now ?

if you're trying to manipulate my emotions by feigning affection for the smiths, i am butt hurt as well. and you know what happens to snowflakes when they cry.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Why wait til next year? He could do one right now with all the "adults" bemoaning Trump's victory. The faces are already there for you to see, just gotta look around.

Jimmy Kimmel does the Halloween episodes where they film kids who think all their candy is gone, and a Christmas one where they see the reaction to kids getting empty boxes. He really should consider getting one with Trump supporters around March or so. I want to see what that face looks like on adults.

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Why wait til next year? He could do one right now with all the "adults" bemoaning Trump's victory. The faces are already there for you to see, just gotta look around.

Apparently you've never seen one of the episodes. That's OK. You can't force it. February or March. Stay tuned.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Posted (edited)

Why wait til next year? He could do one right now with all the "adults" bemoaning Trump's victory. The faces are already there for you to see, just gotta look around.

we've progressed from bemoaning, those who are paying attention are currently rubber necking the disaster that is the trump team. it seems they did zero preparation for the job they campaigned for. Edited by smilesammich
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...