Wikileaks has released that Soros-linked Voting Machines that are used in 16 US states rigged the 2004 Venezuelan election!

[Teddy B 17,252]

Warning: This is a tin foil hat area! Tin foil hats must be worn at all times!

Wikileaks has released that Soros-linked Voting Machines that are used in 16 US states rigged the 2004 Venezuelan election!

What are we doing letting billionaire leftist and Clinton crusader George Soros get anywhere close to our elections?

The Smartmatic machines will be used in the battleground states of Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

The documents WikiLeaks released have revealed that Smartmatic’s machines helped to rig the 2004 elections in Venezuela in favor of Hugo Chavez.

http://joeforamerica.com/2016/10/wikileaks-shocker-see-logo-voting-machine-demand-paper-ballot-asap/?utm_source=TE&utm_medium=shr&utm_campaign=TE

[Teddy B 17,252]

Looks like the "rigged election" folks are covering all of the bases. Something about a site called "Viral Liberty" that hosts an article from the "Elder Patriot" that makes me feel all warm n fuzzy inside.

WARNING: Do NOT Use VOTING MACHINES OWNED BY SOROS- THIS IS HOW YOU CAN TELL & WHAT TO DO INSTEAD!!

ELDER PATRIOT – Last week we exposed Hillary Clinton’s major donor George Soros’ efforts to rig the coming election through his control over Smartmatic voting machines that will be used to tabulate the votes in 16 states including the eight battleground states of Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Virginia.

Soros’ control over these machines is being conducted under the guidance of Mark Malloch Brown who is the chairman of Smartmatic. Brown is the former number two at the United Nations and author of “The Unfinished Global Revolution.” He also sits on the board of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Soros interest in rigging this election is no different from the way he has operated in the past. Soros has made billions of dollars running a hedge fund that bets on global events and then guarantees the outcome of those bets by controlling the outcomes of those events in advance.

We cannot let a diabolical billionaire investor steal this election for Hillary Clinton who, it has been well documented, has benefitted from more than a billion dollars in Soros money during her campaign this year, already. Soros has contributed $650 million to Black Lives Matter alone in an effort to rile up the Black community and scare them into voting for another Democrat.

http://viralliberty.com/warning-not-use-voting-machines-owned-soros-can-tell-instead/

[Dashinka 25,209]

Is anything "tin foil" hat material anymore? Did the Sanders supporters that thought the system was rigged for Hillary wear "tin foil" hats or were they able to get their respect back when the story came out.

Personally, I think it is a mistake for Trump to focus on this with one exception. It may lead his most ardent supporters to help get out the vote for him on their own as the GOP GOTV program is no near as efficient as the Dems.

Edited October 25, 2016 by Bill & Katya

[smilesammich 10,727]

Warning: This is a tin foil hat area! Tin foil hats must be worn at all times!

there's a yuuuuge 'probably' in that quote. and it's surrounded by no words saying 'soros machines vote for what our repilian overloads should have us led by'. i'm not really impressed.

i need more context, tin foil should be used sparingly.

[Teddy B 17,252]

Is anything "tin foil" hat material anymore? Did the Sanders supporters that thought the system was rigged for Hillary wear "tin foil" hats or were they able to get their respect back when the story came out.

Personally, I think it is a mistake for Trump to focus on this with one exception. It may lead his most ardent supporters to help get out the vote for him on their own as the GOP GOTV program is no near as efficient as the Dems.

Some things are believable, others are not. I personally believe the DNC's use of super delegates is an unfair advantage to whoever the leaders of the party want elected. I also think the use of delegates in our presidential election should be done away with. One person, one vote end of story.

I don't however believe that voting machines are rigged, nor do I believe that voter fraud is a problem in any election.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

On the other hand the use of Super delegates by the Republicans might have spared 'Merca from the jack-o-lantern filled with raw sewage currently heading up their ticket. Food for thought.

[Teddy B 17,252]

On the other hand the use of Super delegates by the Republicans might have spared 'Merca from the jack-o-lantern filled with raw sewage currently heading up their ticket. Food for thought.

Touche!

Still mind boggling how Trump came out on top out of a field of 17 candidates.

[JayJayH 546]

On the other hand the use of Super delegates by the Republicans might have spared 'Merca from the jack-o-lantern filled with raw sewage currently heading up their ticket. Food for thought.

Touche!

Still mind boggling how Trump came out on top out of a field of 17 candidates.

On thing the GOP could learn from the French: When no candidate wins a majority the first time around, let first and second place run one-on-one.

[Teddy B 17,252]

On thing the GOP could learn from the French: When no candidate wins a majority the first time around, let first and second place run one-on-one.

I do think that when you have a field that consists of more than 3 candidates, there should be an elimination round to narrow the field to two.

[Dashinka 25,209]

On thing the GOP could learn from the French: When no candidate wins a majority the first time around, let first and second place run one-on-one.

Would the GOP leadership have been happy with Cruz? Personally, I think he would be better than Trump, but I think the leadership would have hated either one.

[JayJayH 546]

I do think that when you have a field that consists of more than 3 candidates, there should be an elimination round to narrow the field to two.

Agreed. Eliminates the "need" for superdelegates. Minimizes the odds of another Trump.

Ironically, it was the GOP's insistence on "trusting the voters" that lead them to nominating the least popular candidate in history.

Edited October 25, 2016 by JayJayH

[Rob L 3,811]

Would the GOP leadership have been happy with Cruz? Personally, I think he would be better than Trump, but I think the leadership would have hated either one.

the GOP could never countenance a booger eater

[Teddy B 17,252]

I do think that when you have a field that consists of more than 3 candidates, there should be an elimination round to narrow the field to two.

Should read "3 or more candidates".

[JayJayH 546]

Would the GOP leadership have been happy with Cruz? Personally, I think he would be better than Trump, but I think the leadership would have hated either one.

I'm fairly certain they'd still hate the guy. But Cruz they could at least count on to be stable, listen to advisers and not throw the concept of American democracy to the wolves.

The only thing the GOP had to do this year. The only thing they had to do this year, was to nominate a candidate who could (1) articulate a policy proposal, (2) say "Raza-affiliated" instead of "Mexican", (3) show up to a debate looking half presidential, and (4) whose favorable ratings were higher than Hillary's abysmal ones.

So they nominated the only candidate out of 17 who failed all of the above.