It turns out Podesta's emails being hacked by the Russians is just a conspiracy theory

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

If they did that it would no longer be secret intelligence.

Well since Hillary claimed publicly that they did the secret part is kind of out the window wouldn't you say.

Are you implying Hillary released classified Info again.

[Rob L 3,811]

Well since Hillary claimed publicly that they did the secret part is kind of out the window wouldn't you say.

Are you implying Hillary released classified Info again.

No I am not implying that. did Hillary say anything not in the public statement ?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

No I am not implying that. did Hillary say anything not in the public statement ?

She said 17 different agencies said the Russians were behind the hack. Is there evidence to support that claim?

[Rob L 3,811]

She said 17 different agencies said the Russians were behind the hack. Is there evidence to support that claim?

did you read the public release?

[B_J 2,752]

She gave a link to the 16 agencys. Not to any info that they all came to the conclusion that the Russians hacked the Email. Many of them listed have nothing to do with that kind of intel. We will make this easy. Show me where the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency or the DEA investigations lead to that conclusion?

Let me see if I understand this. Here is part of the statement:

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations."

And then Maven gave us the list of the 16 agencies that make up the US Intelligence Community that made the statement.

Your issue is that you want each individual agency to make the same statement instead of one USIC statement? Seriously? You're not arguing the original topic or anything else; you just want all the agencies to make the same statement. Only then will you be satisfied.

[Rob L 3,811]

Let me see if I understand this. Here is part of the statement:

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations."

And then Maven gave us the list of the 16 agencies that make up the US Intelligence Community that made the statement.

Your issue is that you want each individual agency to make the same statement instead of one USIC statement? Seriously? You're not arguing the original topic or anything else; you just want all the agencies to make the same statement. Only then will you be satisfied.

NB has high standards when considering intelligence

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Let me see if I understand this. Here is part of the statement:

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations."

And then Maven gave us the list of the 16 agencies that make up the US Intelligence Community that made the statement.

Your issue is that you want each individual agency to make the same statement instead of one USIC statement? Seriously? You're not arguing the original topic or anything else; you just want all the agencies to make the same statement. Only then will you be satisfied.

Hillary said in the debate 17 different intelligence anginces confirmed that the Russians were behind the hack.

This is not that complicated. Is that true or not

Edited October 25, 2016 by Nature Boy Flair

[smilesammich 10,727]

Hillary said in the debate 17 different intelligence anginces confirmed that the Russians were behind the hack.

This is not that complicated. Is that true or not

..

npr too librul?

http://www.npr.org/2016/10/19/498293478/fact-check-trump-and-clinton-s-final-presidential-debate

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

..

npr too librul?

http://www.npr.org/2016/10/19/498293478/fact-check-trump-and-clinton-s-final-presidential-debate

Nothing in that thumb numbing wall of text that fact checks that 17 different agencies have confirmed this.No mention that all 17 agencies agree.

U.S. intelligence agencies have not called out Russian President Vladimir Putin by name. But an Oct. 7 statement issued by the director of national intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security said this: We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities

[smilesammich 10,727]

Nothing in that thumb numbing wall of text that fact checks that 17 different agencies have confirmed this.No mention that all 17 agencies agree.

U.S. intelligence agencies have not called out Russian President Vladimir Putin by name. But an Oct. 7 statement issued by the director of national intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security said this: We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities

well, i guess i wasn't of any help. read your post again though just to be sure.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

well, i guess i wasn't of any help. read your post again though just to be sure.

You tried dear. That is all that matters

[smilesammich 10,727]

You tried dear. That is all that matters

rubber..glue, love.

[eieio 1,594]

Nobody actually knows who the hacker/s are. Could be the Russians, could have been Seth Rich, could have been straight from someone in hillarys campaign….or even the 400 pound hacker living in his moms basement.

[Rob L 3,811]

Nobody actually knows who the hacker/s are. Could be the Russians, could have been Seth Rich, could have been straight from someone in hillarys campaign….or even the 400 pound hacker living in his moms basement.

Yeah we heard that line about three weeks ago. I think we need to get Baron Trump on the job right away.

Do we know what would motivate the collective body of US intelligence officials to express a 90 % confidence level that the Russian Administration was driving this?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Yeah we heard that line about three weeks ago. I think we need to get Baron Trump on the job right away.

Do we know what would motivate the collective body of US intelligence officials to express a 90 % confidence level that the Russian Administration was driving this?

So I ask again please link me to something showing that the DEA and the Geospatial-Intelligence Agency support this. Army Intelligence? Navy.

Hillary said all agree. All 17

Can you back this up