Hillary's Cozy Relationship with the Main Stream Media

[Dashinka 24,999]

Of course this is all the fault of the Russians, but who cares. The Hillary camp is not refuting anything, so I for one am glad someone is airing her dirty corruption.

After binging for hundreds of minutes on the Donald Trump sex-talk tape, the liberal networks are now tiptoeing around the Wikileaks revelations, but spinning it as some kind of Russian conspiracy. CBS reporter Nancy Cordes said there were was Enough to create a steady stream of embarrassment for the Clinton campaign, which aides argue is exactly what the Russians and Trump want.

What theyre blatantly failing to cover is the growing list of reporters openly colluding with the Clinton campaign. Their professionalism is completely compromised. This is only a partial list:

ABCs George Stephanopoulos harshly interviewed author Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer on his Sunday show on April 26, 2015. In an e-mail, Clinton campaign staffer Jesse Ferguson boasted Stephanopoulos refuted Schweizer. Great work everyone. This interview is perfect. He lands nothing and everything is refuted (mostly based on our work). Stephanopoulos doesnt just donate to the Clinton Foundation. He donates at the office.

Maggie Haberman of the New York Times was singled out as a pliant recycler of their narratives: We have has [sic] a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed.

Mark Leibovich of the New York Times gave Hillarys communications director Jen Palmieri you could veto what you didnt want for quotes to be included in a Hillary profile in July. At the end of an email, Palmieri listed her vetoes, then shot back like a boss: Let me know if that is not clear. Working from an iPhone on the plane so am not able to access the transcript to cut and paste.

CNBCs John Harwood who moderated the CNBC GOP debate/debacle was telling Podesta how great Hillary looked: She looked so much more comfortable talking to Andrea today than to Brianna a few weeks ago. He sent the Clinton aide a tweet he posted defending Hillarys ethics: if theres any specific/plausible suggestion of nefarious email @HillaryClinton was trying to hide, I havent heard it.

There is more, just follow the link.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/14/what-weve-learned-from-wikileaks-team-clinton-treats-reporters-like-butlers-and-maids.html

Edited October 15, 2016 by Bill & Katya

[millefleur 5,047]

Those pesky Rooskies!!!! Somehow they're so behind us yet so ahead of us at the same time.

[Dashinka 24,999]

The vast Russian conspiracy!