URGENTLY NEEDED SOME HELP

[Pennycat 880]

Thank you for the reply. My fiance have a previous conviction but it doesn't apply with all conviction that's in the application form that we submitted. There's question there about criminal history about certain category. But his past doesn't match with any Of them. That's why we didn't say or wrote anything about it. Could that be the reason on why we got transferred?

I really don't know, sorry. I said before that what I (and others) have noticed about cases that get transferred to VSC it does usually seem to have something to do with IMBRA-- either the type of site you met on, or legal past of the petitioner or anything that someone might thinks warrants a second look. But that is NOT necessarily true, just an observation. And even it if is---it's not a bad thing! It's just a second look, the worst thing that means right now is a bit more time to your timeline. For all we know, they randomly pull a few out of the pile and transfer to VSC to train new people and it's the luck of the draw.

Take another look at pages 2 and 3 of the instructions for I-129f and see if the expanded definitions fit your fiance's past convictions. Even if it does, it's not a "no" for the visa, it's just a waiver needed. Or, again, it could be nothing.

[Randy&Marie 8]

Thank yo for the reply. We already did read the instruction before we filed the I-129F last May. That is why we both know that his past doesn't fall with any categories in the instruction. That is also why we didn't mentioned or wrote them down. Also we met in an online gaming site so it doesn't fall in IMBRA too that's why we checked "NO" for that matter. We are actually buying that idea that maybe, just maybe, they are trying to look further more about his past conviction. I just hope and pray that it won't be too long before we hear from them again. In Jesus name it would be nice if its an approval and not RFE. This is so stressful and its killing me.

I really don't know, sorry. I said before that what I (and others) have noticed about cases that get transferred to VSC it does usually seem to have something to do with IMBRA-- either the type of site you met on, or legal past of the petitioner or anything that someone might thinks warrants a second look. But that is NOT necessarily true, just an observation. And even it if is---it's not a bad thing! It's just a second look, the worst thing that means right now is a bit more time to your timeline. For all we know, they randomly pull a few out of the pile and transfer to VSC to train new people and it's the luck of the draw.

Take another look at pages 2 and 3 of the instructions for I-129f and see if the expanded definitions fit your fiance's past convictions. Even if it does, it's not a "no" for the visa, it's just a waiver needed. Or, again, it could be nothing.