Jump to content

207 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

ea74efb1cde68f233700a21e6e7f5407.jpg

consuming desire to mingle with road crews, sailors, soldiers........?

someone needs therapy...stat!

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

1.

The government's money is my out-of-pocket money. I pay federal, state and local taxes. The Japanese American victims of internment were largely still alive at the time. They were largely reimbursed. Native Americans have not received cash settlements, but land ownership. I agree that black Americans should have been paid reparations in the mid to late 1800s. The sad truth however is that now, over 150 years later, it's a political impossibility.

2.

Here's why this is a touchy subject to "white people":

Slavery ended in the south in 1865.

When you say "white people" - Who are you talking about? Are you talking about descendants of Irish immigrants who fled the Irish potato famine to non-slave states in 1852? Do you mean descendants of Portuguese sailors who arrived in Hawaii in 1860? Are you talking about descendants of Italian immigrants who arrived at Ellis Island in 1880? Do you mean the great great grandchildren of Greek immigrants who arrived in 1890? The Brazilian American distant relatives of Portuguese migrants to Brazil in 1900? The descendants of Ukranian immigrants arriving in 1910? The great grandchildren of Polish immigrants who arrived in Chicago in 1920? Do you mean grandchildren of Spanish-Mexican immigrants who arrived in 1930? The grandchildren of Ashkenazi Jews who fled the Nazis in 1940? Do you mean descendants of Scandinavians arriving in Brooklyn in 1950? Or children of Hungarian migrants in 1960? Maybe the still-living Armenian immigrants who fled the Soviet Union in 1970? Do you mean Persians arriving in 1980, or the Russians who arrived after 1990? The millions of white Americans today who have 1/6 cherokee and 1/8 black ancestry? I'm just asking because people who throw the term "white people" around like it was sour-tasting Halloween candy seem to have very little understanding of the complex and diverse history of European immigration to the Americas.

Who should receive reparations? Somali refugees in Minnesota? Ethiopian immigrants in Los Angeles? Nigerian Americans in Houston? Half black, half white Americans whose paternal ancestors were slaves, and whose maternal ancestors were slave owners? Jamaicans Americans in New York? Only direct descendants of slaves who can prove "pure blood?"

Yes, "white people" owned slaves in America prior to 1865. However, unless you want to round up all the ones who can trace their ancestry back to the pre-1865 southern states, what it would come down to is that everyone, including white Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans and black Americans paying reparations to a somewhat accurate lineage of the the great, great, great grandchildren of slaves.

3.

I don't consider any of my posts "hate talking" so I'll leave that one for others.

4.

I have about as much "white privilege" as an unemployed West Virginian ex-coal miner with a disability paycheck and an alcohol problem. I did have a socioeconomic privilege growing up however. I do think black American descendants of slaves are owed something in this country. I don't believe government checks are the answer.

1, This country gives out billions of dollars to overseas and other random countries. We have neighborhoods looking like war zones right outside of the nation's capitol. It can be done, but I know there would be too much resistance.

2. I mean white people right now here in this place. It's touchy because the folks here that respond this kind of dialogue aren't trying to have in it an educational way. As val pointed out, hearing reparations for black people automatically renders a negative response. I give props to Unsmiley and Randy for giving some insight, but the rest is white noise(pun intended).

3. It wasn't aimed at you.

4. And even if you were an unemployed WV, you'd still have more privilege than me in a 3 piece suit wearing glasses, working for the federal government, and abstaining from alcohol. Trust me.

I have never in my life heard of a Korean American who experiences police brutality or gets blamed for the actions of Kim Jong-un or the Virginia Tech shooter. Nor have I ever met an Indian American wrongly accused of gang membership.

Plenty of times however, I have been accused of being a bad dancer, a Republican, a truck owner, a country music lover, someone who doesn't understand culture and apparently, white men can't jump?

Point being - Asian Americans have the lowest incarceration rates in the nation, the highest average incomes, the highest life expectancy, the highest college attendance and the lowest drop-out rates. My Asian American ex wife's job application success rate was 5x greater than mine. Is there a particular reason Asian privilege isn't "a thing?" Or do we only focus on blanket statements about a mystical white male when it comes to the societal boogey man?

Asian Americans do get privilege of the same type, but since this country is over 65% white, there's no reason to label it Asian privilege.

As for mystical, there's been hundreds of studies, experiments, and trials that prove without a doubt that white privilege is real as the nose on your face. Direct correlations showing that the situation will ALWAYS be different based on the color of one's skin.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Posted

Asian Americans do get privilege of the same type, but since this country is over 65% white, there's no reason to label it Asian privilege.

As for mystical, there's been hundreds of studies, experiments, and trials that prove without a doubt that white privilege is real as the nose on your face. Direct correlations showing that the situation will ALWAYS be different based on the color of one's skin.

What privileges do Asian Americans have?

Asian Americans are held to much high bar for College Entry Admissions compared to other minorities.

In my company who has 4 or 5 retrenchments since I been there, 99% people laid off were white people which I find it strange (there are many nationalities and people of colors).

I asked around, the general answer I got is the company is afraid of lawsuits from people of colors for bias retrenchment.

The safest bet is to lay off white people who can't complain.

Done with K1, AOS and ROC

Posted

What privileges do Asian Americans have?

Asian Americans are held to much high bar for College Entry Admissions compared to other minorities.

In my company who has 4 or 5 retrenchments since I been there, 99% people laid off were white people which I find it strange (there are many nationalities and people of colors).

I asked around, the general answer I got is the company is afraid of lawsuits from people of colors for bias retrenchment.

The safest bet is to lay off white people who can't complain.

You do realize that in order to file discrimination you need to have proof? If it were that easy, we'd be running this place.

Man, I wish I could find these companies where I can just say I've been wronged because of my race and get paid.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

So my company is hiring right now - we are going to hire a woman by the looks of it. I looked back at who has been hired in the past and was surprised.

When I was hired 70% of the office was woman. After I was hired they have hired one man, and 7 women.

Of the 7 women hired after me, three had immigrated from China.

I don't think the company is intentionally biased but I was surprised looking back.

PS. I am not in a woman dominated field.

Edited by Sousuke

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Posted

You do realize that in order to file discrimination you need to have proof? If it were that easy, we'd be running this place.

Man, I wish I could find these companies where I can just say I've been wronged because of my race and get paid.

If the company retrenches people based on poor work performance, it is ok.

But I know some non-white people suck at their work yet they survive retrenchment after retrenchment. Truly a Christmas miracle.

Everyone can file a lawsuit in US (if they have the money). Whether they will win or not, is different story.

The media will only need to get a whiff of the discrimination lawsuit and the reputation of the company will probably go down the toilet even if there are no wrongdoings.

My company is big MNC, so they care a lot about company image. ( I heard that they got sued before in the past ).

Done with K1, AOS and ROC

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

I don't think the company is intentionally biased [...] I am not in a woman dominated field.

Might the company be singlehandedly trying to make up for/correct/atone for a real or perceived historical male-over-female imbalance in your field? Might this be to score points with the Board of Directors, the customer base, or the Federal government?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

Might the company be singlehandedly trying to make up for/correct/atone for a real or perceived historical male-over-female imbalance in your field? Might this be to score points with the Board of Directors, the customer base, or the Federal government?

We are pretty small so I don't think so. The hiring process is very transparent - we all hear / see the interviews due to an open style office.

The only thing that comes to mind is that male interviewers may be slightly more aggressive and that actually doesn't go over well with the owners.

Edited by Sousuke

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Interesting.

And no privacy in the office, even for interviews?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

If the company retrenches people based on poor work performance, it is ok.

But I know some non-white people suck at their work yet they survive retrenchment after retrenchment. Truly a Christmas miracle.

Everyone can file a lawsuit in US (if they have the money). Whether they will win or not, is different story.

The media will only need to get a whiff of the discrimination lawsuit and the reputation of the company will probably go down the toilet even if there are no wrongdoings.

My company is big MNC, so they care a lot about company image. ( I heard that they got sued before in the past ).

Then they need to get fired. That's on management. If you're not getting written up and punished for poor performance, that's their fault. And most POC don't have that type of money, UNLESS they actually have a case they might be able to win.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...