Trump: 'I Hope' Russia Finds Missing Clinton Emails

[smilesammich 10,727]

and those consequences are up to the states to decide!!

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

yeah, he was all "i'm not going to tell putin what to do..unless it's me"

come on, people wouldn't get on board with that. but if he said "women voting isn't my problem - let the states decide!" then he'd get cheers.

I'm not so sure anymore. This is starting to get scary.

That's not that big of a leap for Trump. He's already said that women should face legal consequences for having an abortion. Welcome to 1952!

Yep, that's why I brought it up. The good ole days...

[Rob L 3,811]

He added that if Russia, or any foreign government, is, in fact, behind the hack, it simply shows just how little respect other nations have for the current administration.

At the end of the day Hillary created this mess.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html?_r=0

Agreed that if there was no State Department data on a private server she would be "off the hook"

It still not OK for a Presidential candidate to publicly advocate foreign powers to steal from us.

Is there nothing that this jerk says that causes folks to pause and think about the risk he poses?

At this point , I am not sure. When folks become emotionally attached to a solution they will continue to double down.

This is no longer about rational argument...the personality cult of Trump winning out.

[Teddy B 17,252]

In parallel with the White House thread. 1952 is the year the white house was rebuilt.

IE most of what the slave built is underneath a ball park.

And 1952 was the year one of our greatest Presidents was elected in Dwight Eisenhower.

[Sousuke 1,214]

Agreed that if there was no State Department data on a private server she would be "off the hook"

It still not OK for a Presidential candidate to publicly advocate foreign powers to steal from us.

Is there nothing that this jerk says that causes folks to pause and think about the risk he poses?

At this point , I am not sure. When folks become emotionally attached to a solution they will continue to double down.

This is no longer about rational argument...the personality cult of Trump winning out.

The data is already out there though. Its going to be up on wikileaks soon.

[smilesammich 10,727]

wonder if anonymous is going to get involved.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Agreed that if there was no State Department data on a private server she would be "off the hook"

It still not OK for a Presidential candidate to publicly advocate foreign powers to steal from us.

Is there nothing that this jerk says that causes folks to pause and think about the risk he poses?

At this point , I am not sure. When folks become emotionally attached to a solution they will continue to double down.

This is no longer about rational argument...the personality cult of Trump winning out.

Short answer? No. Like we talked about earlier, he's not held to any standard so nothing he does will reflect bad on his character.

[eieio 1,594]

This might be the meltdown of the liberal media so far this year. It is fantastic. They are so bought and paid for by Hillary it is not even funny.

Besides....those emails had "nothing" in them. Lol

Plus...he high jacked the dnc convention. Epic. Master of the media.

[Rob L 3,811]

The data is already out there though. Its going to be up on wikileaks soon.

Are you confusing data stolen from the DNC with the Email Server that Hillary hosted?

[smilesammich 10,727]

Are you confusing data stolen from the DNC with the Email Server that Hillary hosted?

julian said he had more. he just hasn't put it out there yet.

[Dashinka 24,870]

Short answer? No. Like we talked about earlier, he's not held to any standard so nothing he does will reflect bad on his character.

Does this remind you of anyone? I'll give you a hint her initials are HRC.

[Dashinka 24,870]

Agreed that if there was no State Department data on a private server she would be "off the hook"

It still not OK for a Presidential candidate to publicly advocate foreign powers to steal from us.

Is there nothing that this jerk says that causes folks to pause and think about the risk he poses?

At this point , I am not sure. When folks become emotionally attached to a solution they will continue to double down.

This is no longer about rational argument...the personality cult of Trump winning out.

It is amazing to see all the liberals in such a tizzy. If we are to believe Hillary, the only things to see are emails about her yoga and Chelsea's wedding, of course who in their right mind can believe a word out of her mouth. Besides, these were held on a private server not owned by the US. Trump was only trying to get the narrative back to the Hillary emails and it seems to have worked.

Relative to Trump now being a sexist, you should go back and listen to Bill Clinton's speech especially the beginning. I don't always agree with Rachel Maddow, but on this point, I agree, it was a pretty sexist speech at the start.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/maddow-found-the-first-part-of-bill-clintons-speech-shocking-and-weird/

Edited July 27, 2016 by Bill & Katya

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Does this remind you of anyone? I'll give you a hint her initials are HRC.

Here's the difference. Folks here that are leaning to the left have no issues with saying she's a poor choice of a candidate. Her various missteps are well known, and if we had ANY other options(Sanders) I'd vote for him in a second.

Can you say the same thing about Trump? Because he has various issues, lawsuits, and everything else that HRC has, but no one here wants to talk about THAT. Trump's supporters don't believe there's anything wrong with him.

Case in point. If HRC said the exact same thing in regards to Trump, this place would explode. But since Trump said it, all is right with the world.

[Dashinka 24,870]

Here's the difference. Folks here that are leaning to the left have no issues with saying she's a poor choice of a candidate. Her various missteps are well known, and if we had ANY other options(Sanders) I'd vote for him in a second.

Can you say the same thing about Trump? Because he has various issues, lawsuits, and everything else that HRC has, but no one here wants to talk about THAT. Trump's supporters don't believe there's anything wrong with him.

Case in point. If HRC said the exact same thing in regards to Trump, this place would explode. But since Trump said it, all is right with the world.

Whoever said there was nothing wrong with Trump. He certainly wasn't my first choice, but hey, that is democracy. My issue is with Hillary, her elitism, lack of conviction, sense of entitlement, and downright corruption. i understand your support of her as the leftist position is the most important thing to you, I feel that economically, this move toward socialism is unsustainable in the long run.

[smilesammich 10,727]

It is amazing to see all the liberals in such a tizzy. If we are to believe Hillary, the only things to see are emails about her yoga and Chelsea's wedding, of course who in their right mind can believe a word out of her mouth. Besides, these were held on a private server not owned by the US. Trump was only trying to get the narrative back to the Hillary emails and it seems to have worked.

Relative to Trump now being a sexist, you should go back and listen to Bill Clinton's speech especially the beginning. I don't always agree with Rachel Maddow, but on this point, I agree, it was a pretty sexist speech at the start.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/maddow-found-the-first-part-of-bill-clintons-speech-shocking-and-weird/

i don't. most flotus nominees tell sappy 'how we met' stories at conventions. i don't understand what rachel found shocking and weird.

Whoever said there was nothing wrong with Trump. He certainly wasn't my first choice, but hey, that is democracy. My issue is with Hillary, her elitism, lack of conviction, sense of entitlement, and downright corruption. i understand your support of her as the leftist position is the most important thing to you, I feel that economically, this move toward socialism is unsustainable in the long run.

the 'extraction economy' we're currently suffering is certainly not sustainable. how do you think trump will reverse this?