Trevor Noah Wants to Know Why People Keep Doubting Videos of Police Shootings

[OriZ 3,157]

I know it's mighty funny right? Just the other day I reported said usual suspect breaking the rules yet again, and nothing was done about it. So yeah here I am seeing if maybe that privilege actually works the other way around? If you don't see me here tomorrow you'll know it does.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I could have sworn someone said they NEVER report...

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Ok, maybe worthless is a stretch. He's been useful to some. But I stand by my statement that he's the worst in decades. And I am not comparing him to Trump, since Trump has never been president yet.

If you can do a better job, by all means, run. And please don't say he's worthless if you're thinking Trump can do a better job...

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Ok, maybe worthless is a stretch. He's been useful to some. But I stand by my statement that he's the worst in decades. And I am not comparing him to Trump, since Trump has never been president yet.

Um, no. Unless you're honestly going to say he was worse that Bush?

[OriZ 3,157]

At the time that was said it was true. But rules are rules. When people break them it's time to take off the gloves. First reporting by me was done less than 2 months ago. First ever. Now, I'm not playing around anymore. I'll report certain people left and right.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

To whom here on VJ does the UCMJ apply, exactly?

It's mighty funny, someone was reported and banned for being in a thread another member started. And yet, said member is in a thread that member started and they're still here. Must be that privilege I keep hearing about.

And to clear this up, disrespect towards the POTUS is punishable under the UCMJ. But I guess folks who haven't served in the Armed Forces would know anything about that. But do carry on using that free speech, you're welcome.

Edited July 11, 2016 by ROYGBP

[OriZ 3,157]

Obama vs Bush? Haha is it even a competition?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

To whom here on VJ does the UCMJ apply, exactly?

It does to anyone who served or used to serve. Guess for some of us, that matters.

And I'm waiting for your reply. Would you say that Bush was a better President than Obama?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Actually, no. You are no longer on active duty, so it no longer applies.

It does to anyone who served or used to serve. Guess for some of us, that matters.

And I'm waiting for your reply. Would you say that Bush was a better President than Obama?

Not even a little bit of a competition. Bush wins, hands down. At least he had the respect of our military forces. Something Obama will never have.

Obama vs Bush? Haha is it even a competition?

[OriZ 3,157]

Actually, no. You are no longer on active duty, so it no longer applies.

Not to mention the fact it is silly to start with, even if you are on active duty. Respect should be earned by actions, not because you are the president.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Actually, no. You are no longer on active duty, so it no longer applies.

Not even a little bit of a competition. Bush wins, hands down. At least he had the respect of our military forces. Something Obama will never have.

The worst attack happened on his watch, not to mention a recession.

And it does apply since it's a matter of respect. If folks have a problem with Article 88, then enlist and do something about it.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-03-31/obama-approval-ratings-for-7th-year-top-george-w-bush-s-so-far

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Ummm, attacks on the US are not the fault of any sitting president. What they do in response, that is a different story.

No, article 88 does not apply to enlisted personnel. Also doesn't apply once a person is out of the service. But nice try.

The worst attack happened on his watch, not to mention a recession.

And it does apply since it's a matter of respect. If folks have a problem with Article 88, then enlist and do something about it.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-03-31/obama-approval-ratings-for-7th-year-top-george-w-bush-s-so-far

[OriZ 3,157]

Ummm, attacks on the US are not the fault of any sitting president. What they do in response, that is a different story.

No, article 88 does not apply to enlisted personnel. Also doesn't apply once a person is out of the service. But nice try.

The attack was mostly because of Clinton's inability and unwillingness to do anything about the growing threat before Bush was elected,

The recession was largely the result of the dot.com bubble bursting.

Neither had much to do with Bush, if anything at all.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Ummm, attacks on the US are not the fault of any sitting president. What they do in response, that is a different story.

No, article 88 does not apply to enlisted personnel. Also doesn't apply once a person is out of the service. But nice try.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/04/25/11394219-marine-who-criticized-president-obama-on-facebook-to-be-discharged?lite

You were saying something about not applying to enlisted personnel? But you're right, it's not Article 88, it's Article 134.

It's amazing how much people will do to discredit the POTUS...

[Expat1 971]

It does to anyone who served or used to serve. Guess for some of us, that matters.

And I'm waiting for your reply. Would you say that Bush was a better President than Obama?

Maybe you should spare a little bit of indignation for former service members who shoot up city blocks

The POTUS is weak, divisive, and ineffective. The sooner he and his 'just-us' department are out of there the better