The AR-15 was built for slaughter in war zones

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

kewl siggy nb, a real zinger.

What, I need to unblock sigs?

[smilesammich 10,727]

What, I need to unblock sigs?

i lauled.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Ever notice the same people that tell us it's not fair to judge Muslims by the acts of a few want to take away our guns based on the actions of a few

I think if we can build a wall to keep out Mexicans and misquitos, we should just build an interior wall for gun possessers where good gun owners can safely possess the guns they desire, bad gun owners can be shot or shoot fellow gun owners at will. The paradise made safely inside the interior wall by unimpeded gun possession would have perks like no pesky laws about amounts of guns, or gun types right down to phalanx systems for the true aficionado. Heck perhaps even tactical nukes for those who desire true safety.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

i lauled.

I swear I did not hack Her royal commie highness computer

What are those in the know using these days for appropriate lubrication in moments of... self-reflection?

Wow, a mod liked my Jergens pic and then another (the same?) mod removed it.

SAD!

It appears you jergens picture is still there

On edit It is gone, but my quote is still got it. Guess they are lazy

Edited June 18, 2016 by Nature Boy Flair

[Jacque67 7,328]

That's gone too.

[Sousuke 1,214]

Edited June 18, 2016 by Sousuke

[Sousuke 1,214]

Yep I use it to lube my op rod at least once a year.

[Ban Hammer 13,726]

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

One the flip side of that I saw very little on the attack on my FBI feed from the religious right. I think a Muslim killing a bunch of gays had many of them in a quandary

[ExPatty 502]

Pretty much every major technical advancement to guns has been to make them more capable in war zones. I mean, do people think repeating rifles were made so people could get a second shot on a deer? Civilian arms have always trickled down from military.

[Rob L 3,811]

Not sure I saw this clarification in the thread : "On Monday night, officials clarified that the rifle Omar Mateen used in the shooting was not an AR-15, but a Sig Sauer MCX rifle." which is not a .22 caliber weapon

http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/16/former-navy-seal-the-ar-15-is-a-citizens-best-defense-against-terrorism/

Yeah that shocked me as well. The AR-15's recoil is quite lite compared to say an AK-47. So I do not know how he got PTSD from it at all. I took my neighbor shooting last year with my Glock 22 and my AK,, while we were there we made friends with the guys in the booth next to us. I let them use my magazine for my Glock because they had forgotten theirs, and in return they let my friend find out shooting an AR-15 is. My neighbor/friend said that he was astonished at how lite the recoil was compared to my AK, and how he can just put the red dot on the target and fire. Needless to say he has more respect for firearms now that he has actually fired one.

I read his article yesterday. It was really pathetic, what a total girly man. Also untrue, the recoil from these guns is quite light.

The AR-15 was not built for slaughter in war zones, it is a civilian modification to a weapon built for slaughter in war zones.

But, we keep forgetting what the second amendment is for, it is specifically designed to enable the civilian population to be able to competently defend against a professional military. The SCOTUS won't ever recognize that, and most people are not on board with it, but it's historical fact nonetheless.

The guy is a joke. I don't endorse all arguments of gun rights people to be sure, but I find the general stupidity to be skewed toward the gun control group. When you think you're smart enough to push a law, but say things like a glock can take a bunch of clips (hi, obama), you're talking out of your depth.

Edited June 20, 2016 by Rob L

[Sousuke 1,214]

Not sure I saw this clarification in the thread : "On Monday night, officials clarified that the rifle Omar Mateen used in the shooting was not an AR-15, but a Sig Sauer MCX rifle." which is not a .22 caliber weapon

Its 5.56mm or .223 in.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Its 5.56mm or .223 in.

5.56 and .223 are basically the same round. Main difference is one is a the 5.56 is a Nato standard. Basically means you can shoot a .223 in a 5.56 weapon but not recommended in reverse. Short techno mumbo jumbo version.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

He also used a glock 17 which fires a 9mm round that kills infinitely more people every year than AR style weapons.

Cause Obama is not talking about that.

[Sousuke 1,214]

5.56 and .223 are basically the same round. Main difference is one is a the 5.56 is a Nato standard. Basically means you can shoot a .223 in a 5.56 weapon but not recommended in reverse. Short techno mumbo jumbo version.

It raises a point. Since everyone is claiming that the AR 15 is a military weapon, if he used .223 wylde or .223 Remington they are strictly speaking civilian cartridges.

Edited June 20, 2016 by Sousuke