YOKO ONO: “I HAD AN AFFAIR WITH HILLARY CLINTON IN THE ’70S”

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

The artist and widow of John Lennon, who is in Los Angeles to present a collection of cups and saucers she is exhibiting at the Museum of Modern Art, totally took reporters by surprise by admitting she had not only met the former First Lady at various times during a series of protests against the Vietnam War in New York in the 1970s but also knew her “intimately”.

http://patriotcrier.com/8979-2/

[Jacque67 7,328]

WNDR hoax, but funny!

[Transborderwife 4,666]

https://g.co/kgs/tNcNM

[Jacque67 7,328]

[smilesammich 10,727]

i heard they had a 'bed in' at a goldman sachs corporate suite and listened to nothing but green day covers of lennon while pressing their foreheads together and practicing tantric pranayama. but this was like last week.

[Jacque67 7,328]

i heard they had a 'bed in' at a goldman sachs corporate suite and listened to nothing but green day covers of lennon while pressing their foreheads together and practicing tantric pranayama. but this was like last week.

Last week? That's ancient news!!!

Sounds fun though!!!!!

[Teddy B 17,252]

i heard they had a 'bed in' at a goldman sachs corporate suite and listened to nothing but green day covers of lennon while pressing their foreheads together and practicing tantric pranayama. but this was like last week.

Last week is long since past, you might get banned for posting such an outdated story.

[smilesammich 10,727]

Last week is long since past, you might get banned for posting such an outdated story.

que sera sera

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Last week is long since past, you might get banned for posting such an outdated story.

I see you picked up on something. Shall we call it MDS. So does this mean that if you post repeated anti Clinton or anti Trump stories , it is baiting and we will get banned.

If so we are about to have a 90% vacancy rate.

[smilesammich 10,727]

I see you picked up on something. Shall we call it MDS. So does this mean that if you post repeated anti Clinton or anti Trump stories , it is baiting and we will get banned.

If so we are about to have a 90% vacancy rate.

who knows, that's what's so frustrating (and what will lead to a 90% vacancy rate).. moderation really doesn't make sense. cehst is a forum for baiting, we're here to argue but we have to argue nice or moderation steps in. and for taking hours upon hours to review a thread with mostly nothing but normal friendly banter, they sure come to some half baked conclusions.

[Teddy B 17,252]

I see you picked up on something. Shall we call it MDS. So does this mean that if you post repeated anti Clinton or anti Trump stories , it is baiting and we will get banned.

If so we are about to have a 90% vacancy rate.

who knows, that's what's so frustrating (and what will lead to a 90% vacancy rate).. moderation really doesn't make sense. cehst is a forum for baiting, we're here to argue but we have to argue nice or moderation steps in. and for taking hours upon hours to review a thread with mostly nothing but normal friendly banter, they sure come to some half baked conclusions.

It really is ridiculous. This is the exact thing that we complained about and were supposed to be given our own forum mod. That worked out really great, didn't it?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

who knows, that's what's so frustrating (and what will lead to a 90% vacancy rate).. moderation really doesn't make sense. cehst is a forum for baiting, we're here to argue but we have to argue nice or moderation steps in. and for taking hours upon hours to review a thread with mostly nothing but normal friendly banter, they sure come to some half baked conclusions.

Just for the record GD's comment had nothing to do with following absurdity, he was just joking around with the rest of us, or so I thought with the rest of us.

As for baiting , that is the most absurd idiotic gotcha ever invented. What post isn't baiting. Every post is designed to get a response.

14 anti Trump post or to be fair Pro Trump/anti Clinton is different somehow.

[Jacque67 7,328]

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just for the record GD's comment had nothing to do with following absurdity, he was just joking around with the rest of us, or so I thought with the rest of us.

As for baiting , that is the most absurd idiotic gotcha ever invented. What post isn't baiting. Every post is designed to get a response.

14 anti Trump post or to be fair Pro Trump/anti Clinton is different somehow.

i was just joking about g&d being in the doghouse. but dude left us hangin

i agree.

i would imagine the posts contained in cehst at any given moment are going to reflect the articles and topics that are out there..maybe the problem is that there are too many posts of just, crimes. crimes don't really qualify as 'current events' in my book, or 'hot social topics'. if the crime leads to political discussion or if it falls under the category of a crime commited within the bounds of a 'hot social topic' (lol) then post it and discussion will probably follow. to me it's about consideration for others, no one here wants me to post an article on white privilege everyday, but i could if i wanted to annoy and aggravate everybody.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

i was just joking about g&d being in the doghouse. but dude left us hangin

i agree.

i would imagine the posts contained in cehst at any given moment are going to reflect the articles and topics that are out there..maybe the problem is that there are too many posts of just, crimes. crimes don't really qualify as 'current events' in my book, or 'hot social topics'. if the crime leads to political discussion or if it falls under the category of a crime commited within the bounds of a 'hot social topic' (lol) then post it and discussion will probably follow. to me it's about consideration for others, no one here wants me to post an article on white privilege everyday, but i could if i wanted to annoy and aggravate everybody.

The way I look at that is if you don't like the topic don't reply.Kind of like changing the chanel.

Most of us with opposing views do so and still get along fine.