Persian Gulf Sheikhs Gave Bill & Hillary $100 Million

[lostinblue 1,989]

As a presidential candidate, the amount of foreign cash the Clintons have amassed from the Persian Gulf states is “simply unprecedented,” says national security analyst Patrick Poole.

“These regimes are buying access. You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension,” Poole told TheDCNF in an interview.

The ongoing Clinton financial relationship with despotic Persian Gulf states could hurt Hillary as a supporter of labor rights and tarnish her image as a vigorous supporter of women.

Yet as secretary of state, Clinton consciously and actively sought to legitimize the sheikdoms through many new Department of State programs.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/11/exclusive-persian-gulf-sheikhs-gave-bill-hillary-100-million/#ixzz48RnNIECC

It’s unclear what kind of promises or concessions the Clintons may have given the monarchs in return for their lavish financial support over the years, but last month the candidate reversed her long-standing support for fracking

[Mista Fantastic 13]

t’s unclear what kind of promises or concessions the Clintons may have given the monarchs in return for their lavish financial support over the years, but last month the candidate reversed her long-standing support for fracking

Her Candidacy is about funding the Foundation. It has nothing to do with wanting to make America Great Again.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

The Middle East is complicated, as are most areas of international relations. I don't recall a time, or an Administration that didn't work hard holding their nose and working with some degree of necessary reluctance with various Middle Eastern countries. The Donald is apparently having trouble getting RNC donors, let alone others contributing to his campaign. If he is wildly unpopular within his own Party, Europe and the rest of our allies, it's not too shocking that he is not feeling the love from Middle Eastern allies as well.

[Dakine10 5,452]

Her Candidacy is about funding the Foundation. It has nothing to do with wanting to make America Great Again.

Who's does really?

[lostinblue 1,989]

The Middle East is complicated, as are most areas of international relations. I don't recall a time, or an Administration that didn't work hard holding their nose and working with some degree of necessary reluctance with various Middle Eastern countries. The Donald is apparently having trouble getting RNC donors, let alone others contributing to his campaign. If he is wildly unpopular within his own Party, Europe and the rest of our allies, it's not too shocking that he is not feeling the love from Middle Eastern allies as well.

Whatever it is she promised them, it doesn't change the fact it is quite obvious where her sympathies lie and who now owns her ..........she is in deed a sell-out. The interests of the people and citizens are not going to be priorities if she is elected, regardless of any promises that may be made.

[Jacque67 7,328]

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Whatever it is she promised them, it doesn't change the fact it is quite obvious where her sympathies lie and who now owns her ..........she is in deed a sell-out. The interests of the people and citizens are not going to be priorities if she is elected, regardless of any promises that may be made.

Better to believe in the candidate with decades of history putting on an act, who's campaign manager admitted quite frankly and honestly his campaign so far was just an act and the character he played will now change gears in his effort to get to the White House? I don't think that you are addressing the issue that your conman is struggling to get financial love from his own Party, let alone outsiders.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Better to believe in the candidate with decades of history putting on an act, who's campaign manager admitted quite frankly and honestly his campaign so far was just an act and the character he played will now change gears in his effort to get to the White House? I don't think that you are addressing the issue that your conman is struggling to get financial love from his own Party, let alone outsiders.

You went DDS early in a thread that has nothing to do with Trump. Nice if predictable

[ready4ONE 5,400]

You went DDS early in a thread that has nothing to do with Trump. Nice if predictable

The fact is that the thread is about funding for the Clinton campaign. I see the value in my mention of the Drumpf campaign not getting financial love from his own party. I'm pretty sure as well that the last big story regarding Drumpf campaign funding was in regards to the financial backing of known White Supremists. Not a thread derailment, on topic since the OP is hoping to bash the Clinton campaign for financial contributions from Middle Eastern allies.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

The fact is that the thread is about funding for the Clinton campaign. I see the value in my mention of the Drumpf campaign not getting financial love from his own party. I'm pretty sure as well that the last big story regarding Drumpf campaign funding was in regards to the financial backing of known White Supremists. Not a thread derailment, on topic since the OP is hoping to bash the Clinton campaign for financial contributions from Middle Eastern allies.

Wow of course . Now that you explained it, it makes perfect sense. ?

[lostinblue 1,989]

• Meanwhile, former U.S. Attorney Joseph E. diGenova told the Caller that he believes the FBI has launched a second, possibly more serious investigation into possible political corruption involving the Clinton Foundation. This is potentially explosive, given that the Clintons seem to have run their charity in a way that lines their own pockets.

The question is an open one: Did the oil-rich Mideast nations give lavishly to the Clinton Foundation in an effort to influence future U.S. policy? And what about Bill Clinton’s business partnership with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Dubai’s authoritarian ruler, from 2003 to 2008? Clinton took away some $15 million in “guaranteed payments” from the deal, his tax records show.

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/hillarys-latest-scandal-she-and-bill-siphoned-100-mil-from-persian-gulf-leaders/

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Wow of course . Now that you explained it, it makes perfect sense. ?

I realize that you might have more fun with one sided discussions and rah rah sis boom bah reactions to every OP from Lost, but turnabout is fair play.

[Spamgeneral 46]

Whatever it is she promised them, it doesn't change the fact it is quite obvious where her sympathies lie and who now owns her ..........she is in deed a sell-out. The interests of the people and citizens are not going to be priorities if she is elected, regardless of any promises that may be made.

The interests of the people and citizens aren't going to be priorities if Trump is elected either. Trump will not keep any of the impossible promises he made either. What will you do? Defend him for doing what Hillary does? Are you in favor of illegal immigrants when they work for Trump? I wonder what his stance is on E-Verify? That won't make the idiotic headlines for him like building a wall and making Mexico pay for it, will it? Or how we need legal immigrants to,do all those jobs that are beneath real Americans?

You fell for it, hook line and sinker.